I know what you mean with Cole and you raise some good points, I think he suits some audiences but I think he could easily make the whole show intolerable for others. Personally I feel he is one of the few genuine and real characters on the programme, so many people just seem like products (like Cole's commentary partners Jerry Lawler and Josh Matthews) that he stands out in comparison. Honestly though, I actually think he's probably the best commentator the WWE has. Whilst he can go off on rants a lot, which imo can be funny (although I know for others its annoying), when he calls a match he's normally the best at doing it and to be honest, he's far better then the majority of the other commentators. Lawler is dated, Matthews just seems kind of lame and doesn't have much of a personality but I like him in backstage interviews, JR whilst good at calling a match he wouldn't work due to Cole being on both shows, and Booker, I'll admit I used to slate him however he has improved a lot and he's probably in my fav five (couldn't resist), but I wouldn't say he's better then Cole. I would personally like to see Foley and JR do Smackdown again, I remember them both doing it shortly a while ago and it worked fine, and RAW should be Cole and Booker T. I agree 4 hours of Cole would be too much for most people. Have Stryker and Matthews backstage and I think the whole thing would work a treat. I just doubt Lawler being given the boot as he's been a staple for so long now but he just doesn't do anything new and comes out with such poor obvious comebacks and adds nothing to a match, its kind of boring.