Wrestling Fusion Forums

:: Wrestling Discussion :: => TNA => Topic started by: RyPrax on 16 June 2008, 03:36:14 AM

Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 16 June 2008, 03:36:14 AM
Sorry, it just does.

The main event's a cluster ****.

Their gimmick matches suck.

The only ways they draw is on stars of the past, stolen stars from WWE, or stolen gimmicks they give to other people.

Not to mention their best demo is horny old men. Which is funny cause they're women's champion is like the worst draw on the show.

People berate WWE when a champ (triple H) doen't draw ratings for an entire show, yet it's proven that Kong segments lose the most viewer. Duh.

I could go on all night about how much TNA sucks, but I'll save the rest for when Franchise signs up.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: EH4L on 16 June 2008, 03:39:01 AM
LMAO, I can't wait for Franchise to come back.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Mini Kong on 16 June 2008, 03:41:46 AM
Quote from: EH4L;43
LMAO, I can't wait for Franchise to come back.


I forgot about him :p

But yeah I just about given up on TNA. As many times as I try to watch it I just can't for many reasons. Like prax said ...it is a cluster **** and a half.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Cannon on 16 June 2008, 06:02:28 AM
You know what pisses me off about TNA... The turn people way too much! I watched one week and Roode and Booker T was feuding. Then I comeback the next week and ****ing Booker T is heel teaming with Roode! It was ridiculous and furthermore makes no sense!
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 16 June 2008, 09:47:38 AM
Well it actually does make sense if you watched the PPV and watch impact every week then you would see the transformation of booker t turning heel.  i don't think they should all of a sudden put him back with roode though from whatyou were talking about i mean they could keep those 2 both heel and hate each other at the same time.

Impact was the best wrestling show on no PPV TV i have seen in a very long time. i recommend it to anyone.

I don't think TNA sucks. i think TNA is quite good. but they make bad choices sometimes and never seem to stay good when they got it right.

Of course a lot of people are gonna bash TNA. its not there cup of tea. Wrestling from other country isn't my cup of tea. but TNA has been good ever since sacrifice. with a few minor bad things.IMO.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Pala! on 16 June 2008, 02:57:50 PM
Quote from: Prax;40
Sorry, it just does.

The main event's a cluster ****.

Their gimmick matches suck.

The only ways they draw is on stars of the past, stolen stars from WWE, or stolen gimmicks they give to other people.

Not to mention their best demo is horny old men. Which is funny cause they're women's champion is like the worst draw on the show.

People berate WWE when a champ (triple H) doen't draw ratings for an entire show, yet it's proven that Kong segments lose the most viewer. Duh.

I could go on all night about how much TNA sucks, but I'll save the rest for when Franchise signs up.

I can't agree with you on that one. The Ultimate X match is the best since sliced bread. King of the Mountain is a good concept but was shit this year, good match when booked well though. Six Sides of Steel is great, but its basically a steel cage, but good. Terror Dome was fun. There is some crap ones, but the majorety are good.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 16 June 2008, 03:06:08 PM
First, let me say, how I missed you, Adampro123 :) :D

Quote from: Adampro123;130
Well it actually does make sense if you watched the PPV and watch impact every week then you would see the transformation of booker t turning heel.  i don't think they should all of a sudden put him back with roode though from whatyou were talking about i mean they could keep those 2 both heel and hate each other at the same time.

Impact was the best wrestling show on no PPV TV i have seen in a very long time. i recommend it to anyone.

I don't think TNA sucks. i think TNA is quite good. but they make bad choices sometimes and never seem to stay good when they got it right.

Of course a lot of people are gonna bash TNA. its not there cup of tea. Wrestling from other country isn't my cup of tea. but TNA has been good ever since sacrifice. with a few minor bad things.IMO.


Ok, let me say that it's fine that they may take months to turn someone, plant the seeds, etc etc, but the problem is that most casual wrestling fans have a very short attention span, and don't necessarily tune in every week. That's why WWE does hotshot angles.

Take Jericho turning heel last week.  Sure there was a bit of a "transformation" and the turn was teased, but basically he needed one big impact moment to get it done and get himself over as a new heel. Now I missed the Booker T heel turn obviously but you make it sound like TNA didn't get'r'done like that.

And hey, I never said TNA had bad wrestling, they have some great talent and they've put on some great matches... the problem is there's more to wrestling than pure talent, as we've discussed so many times. A main attribute of that is ring psychology, and with most of the matches either randomly put together or a cluster****, like the main events usually are (they just stick 5 or 6 guys in the ring for a match in some capacity or have a one on one match and have like 11 people interfere for no reason...), TNA fails at ring psychology.

But like you said, that's not everyone's cup of tea. Some people like the brand of wrestling TNA puts out and good on them. But to me it sucks. Beyond some of the good talent they have... the best guys they have are underused, and some of them have stupid gimmicks like carrying bowls of curry on their heads or impersonating former superstars... and there's too many guys in the main event to ever make a meaningful feud work.

Angle vs. Joe gets overshadowed by the dozen other guys in the main event popping in and out every week.

I just don't think it's a viable product.

And Pala, as for their gimmick matches... if you like circus acts, I'll get you tickets to the Cirque du Soleil, how about that?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Pala! on 16 June 2008, 03:11:08 PM
Quote from: Prax;168
First, let me say, how I missed you, Adampro123 :) :D



Ok, let me say that it's fine that they may take months to turn someone, plant the seeds, etc etc, but the problem is that most casual wrestling fans have a very short attention span, and don't necessarily tune in every week. That's why WWE does hotshot angles.

Take Jericho turning heel last week.  Sure there was a bit of a "transformation" and the turn was teased, but basically he needed one big impact moment to get it done and get himself over as a new heel. Now I missed the Booker T heel turn obviously but you make it sound like TNA didn't get'r'done like that.

And hey, I never said TNA had bad wrestling, they have some great talent and they've put on some great matches... the problem is there's more to wrestling than pure talent, as we've discussed so many times. A main attribute of that is ring psychology, and with most of the matches either randomly put together or a cluster****, like the main events usually are (they just stick 5 or 6 guys in the ring for a match in some capacity or have a one on one match and have like 11 people interfere for no reason...), TNA fails at ring psychology.

But like you said, that's not everyone's cup of tea. Some people like the brand of wrestling TNA puts out and good on them. But to me it sucks. Beyond some of the good talent they have... the best guys they have are underused, and some of them have stupid gimmicks like carrying bowls of curry on their heads or impersonating former superstars... and there's too many guys in the main event to ever make a meaningful feud work.

Angle vs. Joe gets overshadowed by the dozen other guys in the main event popping in and out every week.

I just don't think it's a viable product.

And Pala, as for their gimmick matches... if you like circus acts, I'll get you tickets to the Cirque du Soleil, how about that?

Nah don't like the circus, clowns scare me. :)

Yeah, I do agree with you on there is some stupid matches they do. Like those reverse battle royale's, which are stupid and make no sense what-so-ever. But you can't take anything away from the Ultimate X, Six Sides of Steel, Barbed-Wire Massacre. etc.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 16 June 2008, 03:18:42 PM
Quote from: Pala!;170
Nah don't like the circus, clowns scare me. :)

Yeah, I do agree with you on there is some stupid matches they do. Like those reverse battle royale's, which are stupid and make no sense what-so-ever. But you can't take anything away from the Ultimate X, Six Sides of Steel, Barbed-Wire Massacre. etc.


So I guess you don't like Curry Man, Jay Lethal, Shark boy or half the TNA roster? :p:D

Don't get me wrong, the matches can be entertaining, I've just always felt if you needed so many gimmick matches it's because you can't get your talent over. Look at WWE, they use the street fight pretty often (which isn't THAT much of a gimmick when you think about it), maybe a steel cage every month and a half... other than that they pace themselves with their gimmick matches and it makes them super effective.

They had a friggin steel cage match as a pay-per-view main event and it worked.

Some will argue that ONS and the two Elimination Chambers would go against what I'm saying but I don't think so. Those are once a year gimmicks.

And yes, TNA may pace themselves with some of their gimmicks too... but they just feel unnecessary sometimes, or as if they use them specifically to get their talent over.

Whereas WWE uses them to peak feuds.. which is the way it should be, know what I'm saying?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Pala! on 16 June 2008, 03:22:49 PM
Quote from: Prax;173
So I guess you don't like Curry Man, Jay Lethal, Shark boy or half the TNA roster? :p:D

Don't get me wrong, the matches can be entertaining, I've just always felt if you needed so many gimmick matches it's because you can't get your talent over. Look at WWE, they use the street fight pretty often (which isn't THAT much of a gimmick when you think about it), maybe a steel cage every month and a half... other than that they pace themselves with their gimmick matches and it makes them super effective.

They had a friggin steel cage match as a pay-per-view main event and it worked.

Some will argue that ONS and the two Elimination Chambers would go against what I'm saying but I don't think so. Those are once a year gimmicks.

And yes, TNA may pace themselves with some of their gimmicks too... but they just feel unnecessary sometimes, or as if they use them specifically to get their talent over.

Whereas WWE uses them to peak feuds.. which is the way it should be, know what I'm saying?
I agree with you there, everything you said. But I'm not talking about the way they use their gimmick matches, I'm just saying the matches are usually great. Although you right about the way they pace themselves. Quite frankly the booking sucks.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 16 June 2008, 03:24:38 PM
And that's the point I'm trying to make. WWE could put on great Ultimate X and six-sided steel and barb-wired massacre matches too... but it doesn't mean that they either need them or that it would help them.

I'm glad that we agree though, lol.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 16 June 2008, 11:52:34 PM
Quote from: Prax;168
First, let me say, how I missed you, Adampro123 :) :D



Ok, let me say that it's fine that they may take months to turn someone, plant the seeds, etc etc, but the problem is that most casual wrestling fans have a very short attention span, and don't necessarily tune in every week. That's why WWE does hotshot angles.

Take Jericho turning heel last week.  Sure there was a bit of a "transformation" and the turn was teased, but basically he needed one big impact moment to get it done and get himself over as a new heel. Now I missed the Booker T heel turn obviously but you make it sound like TNA didn't get'r'done like that.

And hey, I never said TNA had bad wrestling, they have some great talent and they've put on some great matches... the problem is there's more to wrestling than pure talent, as we've discussed so many times. A main attribute of that is ring psychology, and with most of the matches either randomly put together or a cluster****, like the main events usually are (they just stick 5 or 6 guys in the ring for a match in some capacity or have a one on one match and have like 11 people interfere for no reason...), TNA fails at ring psychology.

But like you said, that's not everyone's cup of tea. Some people like the brand of wrestling TNA puts out and good on them. But to me it sucks. Beyond some of the good talent they have... the best guys they have are underused, and some of them have stupid gimmicks like carrying bowls of curry on their heads or impersonating former superstars... and there's too many guys in the main event to ever make a meaningful feud work.

Angle vs. Joe gets overshadowed by the dozen other guys in the main event popping in and out every week.

I just don't think it's a viable product.

And Pala, as for their gimmick matches... if you like circus acts, I'll get you tickets to the Cirque du Soleil, how about that?

I agree about the ring phycology thing. thats one part that usually makes impact not so good. the thing is that they have so much talent that they wanna get on the show every week and insteadof putting good matches out they just put quick matches out with good wrestling in it and that doesn't usually satisfy.

I mean around sacrifice i was even about ready to give up on TNA. there was way to many gimmick matches.which i like gimmick matches but they gotta be spread out to be special and there has to be good reason for them. And also with how the tag division was getting used along with the x division. but since after sacrifice (which was the worst PPV of the year IMO)
TNA has been doing more of the right thing.


Oh and as for curry man you can't really blame that gimmick on TNA its been a japan gimmick for a long time they just adopted it to see how it would go and a lot of kids seem to like it. i personally would rather see the fallen angel back rather than curry man. either way daniels has been used wrong more than anyone in TNA since late 2006.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 17 June 2008, 12:34:28 AM
See I think we agree on pretty much everything. TNA has a lot of viable talent and some good ideas but in the end I just don't see it coming together. That's what I like about WWE.

As much as Cena draws, as good of a heel Edge or Orton is, there's a sense of consistency and variability that the writers in TNA just don't see to be capable of grasping.

I think Joe is one of the greatest wrestlers in the world. Cage, Styles, etc, can all work. But when they have shit writers there's only so much one can like them. Same reason why Cena gets booed half the time.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 18 June 2008, 11:10:33 AM
Quote from: EH4L;43
LMAO, I can't wait for Franchise to come back.

Nice of you to say.

That aside, I have no wish to endorse this thread topic with a response or even care about it's existence, which is not to make a point, but make an argument.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: squeaksjr on 18 June 2008, 03:40:39 PM
they have quite a good roster its just that they dont know what to do with it, kurt angle claims their gaining old superstars t train the younger guys so will it pay off or are they waisting time?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Cannon on 18 June 2008, 07:37:30 PM
Quote from: Adampro123;130
Well it actually does make sense if you watched the PPV and watch impact every week then you would see the transformation of booker t turning heel.  i don't think they should all of a sudden put him back with roode though from whatyou were talking about i mean they could keep those 2 both heel and hate each other at the same time.

Impact was the best wrestling show on no PPV TV i have seen in a very long time. i recommend it to anyone.

I don't think TNA sucks. i think TNA is quite good. but they make bad choices sometimes and never seem to stay good when they got it right.

Of course a lot of people are gonna bash TNA. its not there cup of tea. Wrestling from other country isn't my cup of tea. but TNA has been good ever since sacrifice. with a few minor bad things.IMO.



Well I don't watch Impact everyweek or the PPV because for the most part it sucks.. SO Booker's turn may have made sense. BUT... They shouldn't have him woth Roode at all! IN the storyline Roode broke Sharmell's jaw. So weather Booker is a heel or not you don't team him with Roode for a long time. It just doesn't make sense at all.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 18 June 2008, 08:22:28 PM
If Booker T is a good heel he can get the hometown crowd to turn on him. Edge is able to do that in Canada for the most part.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: geek 3.14 on 19 June 2008, 04:31:33 PM
I tried to watch TNA once but this guy dressed like a shark came out and that was all she wrote for me to be honest. I am pro WWE. WWE WWE WWE WWE WWE I am chanting BTW.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: squeaksjr on 19 June 2008, 04:41:31 PM
well you gotta admit its alittle stupid to steal a gimmick
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 19 June 2008, 06:13:21 PM
Quote from: The Franchise;749
Nice of you to say.

That aside, I have no wish to endorse this thread topic with a response or even care about it's existence, which is not to make a point, but make an argument.


I don't think I've ever agreed with you more, lol.

But it truly does suck for the most part, as has been agreed upon in this thread.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 19 June 2008, 07:34:46 PM
Just saying it sucks is simply retarded.especially with all of you who back WWE for there entertainment you think just because its not WWE it sucks.when in real life TNA may be putting a better show on then WWE you're just to stuck on what you're used to to really give it a chance.

Maybe if you guys actually sat down and watched TNA every week then you would would maybe have a right to say what sucks and what doesn't. i mean if someone came on here and didn't watch WWE sucked we would be all over them.

Point is unless you actually watch the product then don't say it sucks because you aren't making any legit argument that it does.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 19 June 2008, 08:07:41 PM
The thing is I actually do watch the product... I don't watch it every week but I watch enough of it to know that TNA as a promotion has no credibility. We discussed this. They have some good wrestlers and yes they've done some good things with guys like Joe, etc, but I'm sorry, once you need to start hiring ex-WWE guys and beyond that STEAL WWE's old gimmicks, I don't understand how you want me to sit through that week after week in order to give you a legitimate opinion.

You talk about Booker T's slow transition to heel, and I've heard how TNA likes to slowly plant the seeds for feuds and stuff like that, but that's not how it works in wrestling. People don't watch you every single week and they may not watch full shows, and it's because of that. You need hotshot angles and stuff like that to attract people to watch your shows. Otherwise no one will.

So I'm sorry, you can't tell me I need to watch TNA every single week and every moment of the product in order to have an opinion about it. And frankly, I don't think anyone needs to look past Shark Boy or Jay Lethal in order to see that. Or Kevin Nash still being there, or Kurt Angle wrestling with a neck injury and TNA barely telling him to sit a show out, or burying guys like Daniels, etc, etc.

For every good decision TNA has made, they've made at least 5 stupid ones.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 19 June 2008, 08:34:37 PM
Of course they have to have some guys that are already known like the former WWE guys to try to attract more of the casual fan that already know them. i have no problem with TNA having nash or angle or any ex WWE guy as long as they are main event type guys and not guys like scotty too hottie or rikishi or some one like that.

and as for stealing gimmicks it isn't really stealing gimmicks with lethal and shark boy its more to try to be funny and sometimes it is you just have to have a open mind and not get so offended by it.

but what im saying is you can't casually watch TNA and just say it sucks. yes its something a bit different and they need to improve on some stuff but to say it just sucks isn't right. and picking out little things like shark boy is retarded to judge it on. if people picked out little things about WWE you would defend it to the moon and back.

Anyways the point it TNA doesn't "Suck" thats stupid to say, if you don't like it you can say that but i mean don't say that the whole product sucks just because theer are a few things they need to fix.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 25 June 2008, 02:40:22 PM
Quote from: Adampro123;1135
Of course they have to have some guys that are already known like the former WWE guys to try to attract more of the casual fan that already know them. i have no problem with TNA having nash or angle or any ex WWE guy as long as they are main event type guys and not guys like scotty too hottie or rikishi or some one like that.

and as for stealing gimmicks it isn't really stealing gimmicks with lethal and shark boy its more to try to be funny and sometimes it is you just have to have a open mind and not get so offended by it.

but what im saying is you can't casually watch TNA and just say it sucks. yes its something a bit different and they need to improve on some stuff but to say it just sucks isn't right. and picking out little things like shark boy is retarded to judge it on. if people picked out little things about WWE you would defend it to the moon and back.

Anyways the point it TNA doesn't "Suck" thats stupid to say, if you don't like it you can say that but i mean don't say that the whole product sucks just because theer are a few things they need to fix.


I still don't understand why I can't be of the opinion that it sucks... Why would I avidly watch something that I dind't like and thought wasn't good? As a knowledgeable wrestling fan I think I've watched enough wrestling in my day to say whether something is good or not. people have opinions on RAW every week but they don't necessarily watch every hour of WWE programming. And it's clear that TNA has a ton of problems both within their organization and on screen when their product comes out.

To tell me that I can't have an opinion on TNA sucking for the most part is stupid, I can think what I want and a lot of people will agree with me that TNA has little to no entertainment value.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Ms H.B.K. on 25 June 2008, 02:46:50 PM
I watched about 5 minutes one time, but I wasn't keen on it either. I think what I might do is record it one day and just make myself watch it all the way through. Then I can make an informed decision, rather than just saying I don't like it. (I don't think I will like it though, sorry)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Cannon on 25 June 2008, 04:35:15 PM
TNA has engouth talent to be good. They really do with all the young up and comers they have and all of the soild veterans they have as well. But the creative and booking is just done so horrible it's not even funny... First you have Sharkboy and his Austin rip-off gimmick, then you have Sonjay Dutt and his "Guru" gimmick and finally Jay Lethal as Macho Man! Then ontop of the stupid gimmick they give people there booking isn't so great, hell I have seen e-fed booked and written better then TNA!

Plain and simple they need to drop Russo he is behind all this horseshit booking and gimmicks. They need to change something up...
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Ms H.B.K. on 25 June 2008, 07:36:55 PM
Ah see there it is. As soon as I see Russo's name it brings back bad memories.
He seems to have no awareness of how ridiculous the things he does are. He makes mistake after mistake and never learns.
Now I'm tempted to watch just to see what he does next!
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 25 June 2008, 10:47:19 PM
As a business, TNA is making some of the most intelligent decisions they could make. HOWEVER, I have to agree with Prax that regarding the wrestling product, they make approx 5 dumb decisions for every good 1.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 26 June 2008, 02:12:48 AM
Like the burying of there highest selling tag team....
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 26 June 2008, 11:56:34 AM
Quote from: Ultramanits BLACK;2778
Like the burying of there highest selling tag team....

I'm guessing you are referring to Motor City Machine Guns?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 26 June 2008, 09:26:29 PM
Yeah they should never bury the guns no matter if they didn't wanna do blade jobs. it was just ridiculous how long they went without wins up until the past few weeks.

as for the shark boy black machismo things and stuff shark boy hardly ever gets on TV anymore and his gimmick was just supposed to be funny not taken so seriously. And the machismo thing got jay lethal WAY over. i think they should drop it now but at least he got more popular from it. and as you can see within the past few weeks lethal hasn't really been about that he has been more serious.
Oh and the guru sonjay dutt.
well he hasn't been all about the whole guru thing really.and actually the guru thing more of goe with his style of wrestling. its like a smoothness to it. idk how to explain it really. sure i would rather there not be these gimicks but why dwell on them? you still get good wrestling from it.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 26 June 2008, 10:18:12 PM
TNA storylines really don't make any sense.
You had Sonjay turn into a guru just to inevitability have him get pissed off at Lethal so you can have a blow off 80's angle in which I CALLED JAKE ROBERTS SHOWING UP.
Take AJ Styles and Cage, you had them team so Styles can screw Cage andnow they are teaming again!?
TNA's storylines are like the wind, change directions daily. No amount of good wrestling can work around that one simple problem.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 27 June 2008, 12:16:17 AM
Yeah to put AJ with christian doesn't really make that much sense. but what christian has been all about for the past few months ever since he turned face was to move past the past and rebuild friendships.
i wouldn't have put AJ back with him without a angle though.
And the sonjay thing. i don't know if it was just me but i always thought the reason he didn't turn on lethal first was because he was supposed to be the guru and all nice and junk.until finally when jay was gonna wed the woman sonjay loved he couldn't take it anymore.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 27 June 2008, 05:20:03 AM
I realized watching "Impact" tonight that if I wanted to go online & discuss with people how much (& how many ways) it sucks, I would spend more time in a week than I'd want to spend in a month watching it.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Rated Punishment on 27 June 2008, 05:44:49 AM
Did someone say iMPACT....yes, I'm in. I really hate the whole are they face or are they heel situtation that has plagued TNA since it's entering, one minute AJ is good, then bad, then like 2 weeks later out of nowhere he is good again it takes the whole episode of iMPACt just to see who is on what side.
 
Also Samoa Joe and Nash, seriously this has been going on for ages, are they, aren't they, will they, won't they. It's old already and no one really cares about that sub storyline anymore.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 27 June 2008, 05:50:31 AM
Quote from: impactplayer;3070
Did someone say iMPACT....yes, I'm in. I really hate the whole are they face or are they heel situtation that has plagued TNA since it's entering, one minute AJ is good, then bad, then like 2 weeks later out of nowhere he is good again it takes the whole episode of iMPACt just to see who is on what side.
 
Also Samoa Joe and Nash, seriously this has been going on for ages, are they, aren't they, will they, won't they. It's old already and no one really cares about that sub storyline anymore.

1] It occured to me when 3D had their "War against the X-Dvivison guys" they were doing so b/c they were past their prime, & knew the X guys were the reason many fans watched, so they needed to get in the X guys' part of the show to get any viewers.
 
2] Joe & Nash: Are they? Overweight? Heck yes... And Nash is far too old. (Wears that shirt so he can recall his own name.) There's a big (pun intended) diff. between a mega-muscle heavyweight & a guy who's just 300 pounds after too many buffets.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Rated Punishment on 27 June 2008, 06:08:16 AM
(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.coolerads.com%2Fclassified_images%2F7508.jpg&hash=492f44a9e704b7d243dfd3b874ce074ae5f15ecc)
 
Nash in his prime.
 
(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.thesun.co.uk%2Fmultimedia%2Farchive%2F00483%2Fwrestlingmain_483718a.jpg&hash=fb9b40594eac2c9db3164423a9685c2fa96d6c2f)
 
Worn down too many injuries.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Slim on 27 June 2008, 08:15:08 AM
Well when I get bored of watching the same stuff in WWE, I tune in to TNA and find it entertaining because it's something new.
 
I mean it's still scripted wrestling like WWE, but it has a couple of new twists to it. It's still interesting/entertaining to watch. It doesn't suck.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 27 June 2008, 08:17:17 AM
Quote from: Slim;3116
I mean it's still scripted wrestling like WWE, but it has a couple of new twists to it. It's still interesting/entertaining to watch. It doesn't suck.

Oh, but it does... So many twists these days, I can hear it in Tenay's voice half the time that he doesn't get what's going on.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 27 June 2008, 12:20:08 PM
Simple choice really as far as mainstream is concerned.

If you want good storylines, watch WWE.
If you want good wrestling, watch TNA.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 27 June 2008, 08:05:23 PM
Quote from: The Franchise;3137
Simple choice really as far as mainstream is concerned.
 
If you want good storylines, watch WWE.
If you want good wrestling, watch TNA.

If U want good storylines, watch Raw. (JR blogs this week that SD had more great moves/matches to call than he was used to.)
 
But if you want good wrestling, watch both companies. TNA has a mix of good talents WWE had/passed on (I've seen some matches of AJ, etc. from Jakked & the like), & some that were good when WWE?WCW/ECW had them, but aren't now. (Again, Nash, Booker, Kurt, etc.)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 28 June 2008, 04:15:47 AM
Quote from: Slim;3116
Well when I get bored of watching the same stuff in WWE, I tune in to TNA and find it entertaining because it's something new.
 
I mean it's still scripted wrestling like WWE, but it has a couple of new twists to it. It's still interesting/entertaining to watch. It doesn't suck.


How is it new?

Their product includes or has included at some point... Kevin Nash, Kurt Angle, Christian, Jeff Jarrett, the New Age Outlaws, Booker T, Rhino, Raven, a guy that pretends to be the Macho Man and a guy that pretends to be Steve Austin...

That's new?

People say a match between Chris jericho and Triple H that hasn't happened since 2003 is old and TNA is new and refreshing now? :huh
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 29 June 2008, 09:08:28 AM
If you're used to WWE TNA is new. for the most part TNA is more fast paste than WWE is and there for its different in that way.

And i am so sick of hearing every TNA hater dwell on shark boy and jay lethal. shark boy was basically a joke anyways he thinks he is a freaking shark and they never did anything with him so it really doesn't matter and he never gets TV time anyways and Jay lethals was to try to get him over which it did and it needs to end now which it seems like they are doing.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 29 June 2008, 11:51:40 AM
I actually like the "Black Machismo" gimmick. It's also helped Jay Lethal become one of the biggest merch sellers in TNA. But I agree that it should end soon, it can't go on forever or he really will be nothing other than Randy Savage v2.0.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J.D on 5 July 2008, 06:04:02 PM
TNA does not suck, it is just the complete opposite to WWE which is a good thing because if they two products were similar there would be no point in watching TNA. Where WWE is consistent TNA isn't because it is more experimental. However on the odd occasion this can make TNA the best show in the universe when they do get it right e.g. the gimmick matches can suck or be the best thing ever.
And TNA do create their own stars, sure Shark Boy rips off Stone Cold's gimmick, I agree that is totally ridiculous and Shark Boy is a waste of space but TNA has it's own stars such as Samoa Joe, The Motor City Machine Guns, LAX, Kaz, AJ Styles and Christopher Daniels etc. These guys are all extremely talented and I'd say TNA has made Christian Cage who he is as they use him to his potential which they never did in WWE (same with Rhino.)
Neither WWE nor TNA sucks, they are both simply different and I enjoy watching both. And despite all the Awesome Kong haters the women's division in TNA is far superior to that of WWE.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 5 July 2008, 07:47:43 PM
Sorry, but I have to disagree with a few things. First, TNA does suck. Second, It's not the complete opposite of WWE. I agree with you that the womens division is better in tna. But honestly, I don't care if they can wrestle. Thats not what they are there for as far as Im concerned. TNA has copied off of WWE a number of times. Not just the Shark boy SCSA gimmick. Black Muchismo, the promo for Booker T going to TNA. The Full Metal Mayhem match=TLC Match. King of the Mountain... hmm that sounds kinda like something on WWE. Abyss-Kane, Judas Messiah-Undertaker. TNA
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J.D on 5 July 2008, 08:39:32 PM
They are different in so many ways mainly the matches. Listing a few ripped off gimmicks does not make them a copycat brand. 2 gimmicks is nothing as far as I'm concerned when the whole show is completely different and unique.
Comparing Abyss and Judas to Kane and Undertaker is stupid, they are nothing alike and to say that you must have seen little of TNA. You do know that WWE's Kane isn't the only wrestler to have ever worn a mask don't you? Wrestling companies around the world have similar looking wrestlers, it's bound to happen, WWE don't own the wearing a mask look.
King of the Mountain? How is that similar to anything in WWE, I'm not the biggest fan of it but what is it ripping off?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 7 July 2008, 01:08:09 AM
It's not just the mask. It's the whole masked psycho character. And yea, honestly, I've probably only watched a total of..maybe 15 whole shows. I've given TNA many chances to prove that its worth watching. I've tried watching it, it just doesn't interest me. I now watch ECW more than TNA.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: WWEFANbOy on 7 July 2008, 01:36:10 AM
well, i watch TNA and i must admit, the only thing good in that is Team 3d and the Knockouts, they probably give the most
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 7 July 2008, 06:48:34 PM
Quote from: firewall316;5061
It's not just the mask. It's the whole masked psycho character. And yea, honestly, I've probably only watched a total of..maybe 15 whole shows. I've given TNA many chances to prove that its worth watching. I've tried watching it, it just doesn't interest me. I now watch ECW more than TNA.

Are you watching iMPACTs or PPVs? Given that I'm quite big on TNA product as a whole I can honestly say however that the weekly iMPACTs are total dire and only have 1 or 2 worthwhile moments of watching in them. If you don't watch the PPVs however I'd ask you to give them a try because that's what got me into TNA and has kept me an avid fan since.

Also, I'd recommend getting Global Impact (TNA v Japan) and I know you might not be keen on the Japanese influence of the show but it's a great show overall and your not going to find many better matches this year than Angle v Nagata.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 7 July 2008, 06:55:32 PM
I have seen a few PPVs from TNA. One I watched was decent. The other 3, were pretty boring. I was pretty disappointed in their premiere pay per view. It wasn't any more than the other pay per views. It didn't seem like a really big pay per view.

I heard the Global Impact was good, never saw it though. I might watch it, but I doubt it will change my opinion about TNA. I've tried watcing TNA, it just doesn't interest me. And at first I just didn't like it that much. Then I started hating it because of all the people that constantly trash WWE and say TNA is 50x better, when honestly, its crap. And a lot of people I know are realising it. They used to like it like 2 years ago. But they claim to be WWE alternative, and they really aren't any better. I agree they probably do have some better talent, but the show itself is plain crap in my opinion.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 7 July 2008, 07:01:37 PM
Quote from: firewall316;5230
I was pretty disappointed in their premiere pay per view. It wasn't any more than the other pay per views. It didn't seem like a really big pay per view.

The original plan was actually to have Jeff Jarrett defend the NWA Championship against Hulk Hogan. Hogan was injured however and plans changed to use Hardy instead.

Also if I remember correctly that event had a few good matches; Monsters Ball 1, AMW vs. XXX, Williams vs. Styles (Y), Hardy vs. Jarrett wasn't have bad either.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 7 July 2008, 07:05:15 PM
Umm, don't think I saw that one. I meant the last one they had with the Monsters Ball. When I said premiere ppv, thats what they kept saying, its their premiere ppv event or something. It was supposed to be like TNA's Wrestlemania.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 7 July 2008, 07:28:14 PM
Quote from: firewall316;5234
Umm, don't think I saw that one. I meant the last one they had with the Monsters Ball. When I said premiere ppv, thats what they kept saying, its their premiere ppv event or something. It was supposed to be like TNA's Wrestlemania.

Ah Bound For Glory? :huh
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 7 July 2008, 07:58:01 PM
TNA's PPV's aren't even that great anymore. There has been one match from TNA i have wanted to see all year.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 7 July 2008, 08:24:15 PM
Yea thats it, Bound for Glory. Was supposedly TNA's wrestlemania. Wasn't that great.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 7 July 2008, 10:28:29 PM
Quote from: firewall316;5243
Yea thats it, Bound for Glory. Was supposedly TNA's wrestlemania. Wasn't that great.

Well there is a massive difference between BFG and WM for obvious reasons. As far as TNA PPVs go it was one of the top PPVs of that year but not as good as Slammiversary in my opinion. TEN TNA PPVS I would recommend to non-TNA fans are;

Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 7 July 2008, 11:02:09 PM
I think I saw the Slammiversary PPV. And thats the one good one I saw. Bound for glory was.. ok. I also saw No Surrender if that the one with Kurt Angle and all the titles. Thats wasn't very good in my opinion. And especially since everyone says TNA PPVs are so much better than WWE's and thats best thing about TNA. Its not that great in my opinion. I don't see how they are so much better that TNA is worth watching just because of great PPVs and shitty weekly shows. I've only watched about 3 shows since they went to 2 hours. In my opinion, they can't handle a 2 hours show. They can't keep me entertained for 2 hours. A one hour show I could watch sometimes. But they just tried to take a step up to be like WWE, but they can't do it. And if/when they ever move to Monday nights, I will be watching both shows. Just to watch the end of TNA.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 8 July 2008, 12:20:08 AM
Just to add my opinions to what john doe said. TNA isn't the opposite of the WWE anymore. TNA may have used to be with TNA being more about wrestling but now you have so many stories and gimmicks then it kind of surpasses WWE in a way.which isn't what they should be doing. With this said 1 thing i can say is i don't know how anyone can be bored with TNA usually. there fast paste and entertaining with almost everything.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 8 July 2008, 01:39:47 AM
When it was one hour it was fast paced and kind of entertaining. Now, its.. kinda fast paced and not very entertaining.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 11 July 2008, 11:00:06 PM
Quote from: firewall316;5303
When it was one hour it was fast paced and kind of entertaining. Now, its.. kinda fast paced and not very entertaining.

When it was one hour it was pointless, rushed and over-booked.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 12 July 2008, 12:46:37 AM
I agree it was always overbooked. But it was more fast paced then it is now and I thought it was at least somewhat entertaining.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J2M on 12 July 2008, 03:26:47 AM
I don't watch TNA, but that doesn't mean that I can't judge on the name of this topic. TNA doesn't suck, the reason why most think it does it because either they are Indys or WWE and you compare it to what you like best and in some cases it just doesn't match what you like. Now everyone has their own opinion, and TNA has its fans too so they are liked also. Anyway I don't watch the show but I probably would if it was offered down here.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 12 July 2008, 06:57:19 AM
Well I have been able to watch TNA. In my opinion, it pretty much sucks. I mean the show isn't horribly bad. Its just mostly the people that say it is better than WWE. And all they talk about is how different it is, and how much better it is. I have watched WWE for a while. When I first saw a TNA ad, I was excited to maybe see something different. But all I saw was an ok at best show, bashing on WWE trying to get attention. I might like it a little better if they weren't so... pathetic in the way they do things.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 12 July 2008, 11:55:18 AM
For an underdog to bash it's bigger competitor is a good thing though. It gets them attention and some cheap comments. When the bigger company bashes the underdog however it only causes them to freely advertise the underdog and hurt them. It's basic marketing business and top people within both WWE AND TNA know this.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: bigdog on 12 July 2008, 02:10:00 PM
Did WWE ever suck too?... Yes. TNA has stupid stories, But they also have some good stories. They have bad matches and good matches. Does TNA suck sometimes? Yes. Does WWE suck sometimes? Yes!

I rest my case.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 12 July 2008, 05:29:07 PM
Yea... but TNA just sucks out loud. And they leech off of WWE by getting pathetic attention.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: bigdog on 12 July 2008, 10:41:43 PM
Name one time in the past 3 months TNA has leeched off of WWE. Please back up your statements so I can address them Firewall.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 12 July 2008, 10:48:25 PM
Why in the past 3 months?  I've mentioned some earlier in the thread. I probably haven't watched much TNA in the past.. 2 months.  Last most recent thing I remember is exact same time WWE did the SaveUs.222 promos for jericho, they had a thing for Booker T. And it was a cheap ripoff of the SaveUs promo.  It was nothing but a picture with backwords words. Also, the sharkboy thing.. Let me watch TNA this thursday and Ill probably be able to mention something else. Then before that I remembered seeing once I think it was a tag team. Going to WWE Headquarters and just yelling at the windows saying they're shit.

               

             TNA sucks. (https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/showthread.php?p=4836#post4836)           07-07-2008 05:14 PM You can't just say something sucks without saying why.

Just wanted to say, I've never just said it sucks. I've given reasons for my opinion. Whoever this was may not agree with my opinions or reasons, but i have reasons. And I didn't just post that TNA sucks.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 12 July 2008, 11:43:45 PM
Quote from: bigdog;6332
Name one time in the past 3 months TNA has leeched off of WWE. Please back up your statements so I can address them Firewall.

Not sure if it's quite 3 months but I remember a certain Derek Graham Couch being shown on TV and obviously put across as WWE guy getting some kind of leech.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: B-Side on 13 July 2008, 04:22:59 AM
For me. Tna Just appitomises what is wrong with the wrestling business these days of course the problems they have still run rampant through most companys and the WWE included. And they have there high points, The wrestling involved on there PPV's is pretty class but, When you slam together a show of pointless gimmick matches you have to wonder what there trying to cover up. And there promos all lack originality. The feuds are boring and no big billing. Dont get me wrong alright, I dont hate TNA. Infact I used to be a huge fan.. And as it develops im sure I could be again. But realisticly it has alot of growing to do.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Zuccini on 13 July 2008, 11:31:29 AM
i dont watch it so i cant judge it but it has taken so many of our good wrestlers and for that i hate it. Kurt Angle was one of the biggest names in The WWE and he got stolen.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 13 July 2008, 11:55:05 AM
Quote from: Zuccini;6499
i dont watch it so i cant judge it but it has taken so many of our good wrestlers and for that i hate it. Kurt Angle was one of the biggest names in The WWE and he got stolen.

:lol2:

He wasn't stolen but there is no true answer to that question as there is a WWE version and a TNA version to the story, it just depends on which one you believe.

The way I look at it; guys like Kurt Angle, Booker and Christian Cage etc. all jumped to TNA to get a lighter wrestling schedule, get out of the politics by Senators Levesque, Calloway and Governor McMahon, get a chance to do something/something again with their career and go to something NEW and not OLD like Cage said on his debut.

Guys like Rhino, Team 3D etc. all with TNA because they weren't really doing anything in the WWE and I think they were all released too. So they are in TNA for the work and not "Stolen".
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: bigdog on 13 July 2008, 08:15:58 PM
Wow, A lot of posts since mine. Well heres the thing guys, TNA and WWE both have so many issues. But people like to pick on TNA because it's easier and it's because it's something still relatively new.

Let's just face it, Wrestling isn't that great right now. We have thrown together Impacts that have stupid gimmicks, and we have WWE who really seem to lack passion. (And yes, I know that they wrestle practically all the time.) But still, if the passion isn't there, the stories have nothing to stand on.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 13 July 2008, 08:25:38 PM
Ok, well I'm not picking on TNA because its new. Might be easier, but thats not cause its new. And maybe a few people in WWE are lacking passion. But you're saying Edge is lacking passion? Cena? CM Punk? I don't know...  anyway, Im kinda getting bored with this thread.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: bigdog on 13 July 2008, 09:30:22 PM
Quote from: firewall316;6611
Ok, well I'm not picking on TNA because its new. Might be easier, but thats not cause its new. And maybe a few people in WWE are lacking passion. But you're saying Edge is lacking passion? Cena? CM Punk? I don't know...  anyway, Im kinda getting bored with this thread.


No. I do agree Firewall. The people you listed are passionate. VERY passionate. But they are not WWE as a whole. I think TNA as a whole are more passionate. But lack the direction that WWE has.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 14 July 2008, 01:52:06 AM
TNA people look more passionate b/c they are fighting for fans, & knowing all the rumors about TNA losing $ & ratings (not to mention already changing networks once, also their jobs.
 
Add to that last point the fact that many were already released by WWE, & this is the only chance half of them have for jobs, esp. with as big a fanbase as they have (which isn't that big).
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 14 July 2008, 08:36:55 PM
Quote from: bigdog;6279
Did WWE ever suck too?... Yes. TNA has stupid stories, But they also have some good stories. They have bad matches and good matches. Does TNA suck sometimes? Yes. Does WWE suck sometimes? Yes!

I rest my case.


The question wasn't whether WWE sucked... and that's the problem, I think, too many people try to compare TNA to WWE all the time.

When I say it sucks I don't try to compare it to the WWE, but they're not helping the case by filling their roster with former WWE stars and stealing WWF gimmicks.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 14 July 2008, 08:43:48 PM
So TNA produced a must see match last night. The opener of the PPV was rated ****1/2 stars by alot of people plus Shelley finally won a match.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 14 July 2008, 10:23:20 PM
Quote from: Prax;6906
The question wasn't whether WWE sucked... and that's the problem, I think, too many people try to compare TNA to WWE all the time.

When I say it sucks I don't try to compare it to the WWE, but they're not helping the case by filling their roster with former WWE stars and stealing WWF gimmicks.


They can't defend TNA without bashing WWE. TNA wants to be like WWE. No matter how much they bitch about it. They keep getting former WWE stars that were released. And copying gimmicks and anything they can copy. I was surprised they didnt do a thousand dollar giveaway like mcmahon did with a million.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 14 July 2008, 10:46:25 PM
Quote from: firewall316;6921
They can't defend TNA without bashing WWE. TNA wants to be like WWE. No matter how much they bitch about it. They keep getting former WWE stars that were released. And copying gimmicks and anything they can copy. I was surprised they didnt do a thousand dollar giveaway like mcmahon did with a million.

But what is the problem here? And I shall now list why...

Kurt Angle - My view, greatest wrestler alive and well enough to wrestle today.
Christian Cage - Top star.
Booker T - Top star.
Rhino - Adds hardcore/brawl to the TNA locker room.
Team 3D - Still one of the best tag teams around/ever.
Matt Morgan - Fresh young guy.
Kip James/BG James - Not long finished from intense feud and good characters.
Gail Kim - One talented diva.
Tomko - Top star in foreign market plus my view one of the future World Champs.

I'll give you Black Reign though. :closedeyes
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 14 July 2008, 11:12:09 PM
The problem is that they bitch about WWE, then use their wrestlers and gimmicks.

And a lot of them left WWE cause TNA was easier. Probably easier on drugs too. Why Jeff Hardy stayed on TNA for a while.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 15 July 2008, 12:43:20 AM
I can't read this thread any more if you're going to keep using phrases like "WWE stars"... They use pretty -mich any WWE release.
 
I'll give you Gail, & even 3D (tho, as TNA-used celeb says, "not as good as once was"). But they've been surrounding Cage with tag partners & "coalitions" lately b/c that's the only way he was watchable in WWE.
 
If BG James does mainly mic work (as I read he did @ the PPV), Kip is gone. Angle is far past his physical prime (left WWE when he wasn't even physically much decent), & Rhino is "Mr. 3-Count":
 
1] Bore
2] Gore
3] Snore
 
Why does anyone think blink-&-you-missed-him WWE guy Morgan took the job on "Gladiators" near-simultaneously?
 
Hate to tell you, firewall, but I gotta believe anyone who's a TNA fan watches it while being on more drugs than the entire roster combined.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 15 July 2008, 07:06:18 AM
Seriously people if you ran a wrestling company would you really pass up the chance to bring in these former WWE wrestlers? i know i wouldn't for the most part.
i mean i would hire the likes of

Kurt Angle.
Team 3D
Matt Morgan
Christian cage
Booker T
Tomko
Nash

Besides Tomko and Morgan the rest of the guys are already pretty big stars which will bring some more casual  fans to your company.of course TNA is going to get stars that people already know. anyone would its smart.

Now with guys who are washed up and can't really put on good matches anymore i might hire them just because they are a big name and might bring some more casual fans in. and just use them in different roles. maybe have 1 ex wrestler who i sgood on the mic. like BG James replace Don west who isn't that great on the announce team. and then have nash in something like he is now just minus him wrestling. and maybe have some other older guys who can't go manage some younger guy to help get him over. kinda like TNA is doing with steiner and williams but instead of what they are doing actually make the wrestler the known guy is managing look good and not like a wanna be of his manager.

As for TNA being easier on drugs no one knows that so i really can't say either way. but there is nothing wrong that TNA has a easier schedule than the WWE. an easier schedule can let TNA put on better matches and not have there wrestlers so worn down.and gives them less chance of getting injured.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 15 July 2008, 07:21:33 AM
Quote from: Adampro123;7012
Seriously people if you ran a wrestling company would you really pass up the chance to bring in these former WWE wrestlers? i know i wouldn't for the most part.
i mean i would hire the likes of
 
Kurt Angle.
Team 3D
Matt Morgan
Christian cage
Booker T
Tomko
Nash
 
Besides Tomko and Morgan the rest of the guys are already pretty big stars which will bring some more casual fans to your company.of course TNA is going to get stars that people already know. anyone would its smart.
 
Now with guys who are washed up and can't really put on good matches anymore i might hire them just because they are a big name and might bring some more casual fans in. and just use them in different roles. maybe have 1 ex wrestler who i sgood on the mic. like BG James replace Don west who isn't that great on the announce team. and then have nash in something like he is now just minus him wrestling. and maybe have some other older guys who can't go manage some younger guy to help get him over. kinda like TNA is doing with steiner and williams but instead of what they are doing actually make the wrestler the known guy is managing look good and not like a wanna be of his manager.
 
As for TNA being easier on drugs no one knows that so i really can't say either way. but there is nothing wrong that TNA has a easier schedule than the WWE. an easier schedule can let TNA put on better matches and not have there wrestlers so worn down.and gives them less chance of getting injured.

If you would actually hire Cage & Morgan to wrestle (& not in tag teams), I don't know what drugs you need to be tested for, but do it soon.
 
Team 3D, as I said, is still decent, but nowhere near great. (So goes their war against the X Division, so they could be in the highest-rated segments of the show.)
 
Nash needs to follow Flair into retirement before he makes me completely forget he once had ring talent.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 15 July 2008, 07:33:27 AM
Quote from: TJChurch;7014
If you would actually hire Cage & Morgan to wrestle (& not in tag teams), I don't know what drugs you need to be tested for, but do it soon.
 
Team 3D, as I said, is still decent, but nowhere near great. (So goes their war against the X Division, so they could be in the highest-rated segments of the show.)
 
Nash needs to follow Flair into retirement before he makes me completely forget he once had ring talent.

First off what does this have to do with drugs? and no i don't do any.

second what is wrong with cage and morgan? cage is a great wrestler with loads of charisma and has put on great match after great match in TNA. Morgan is a young guy who is big and has even yet to show all that he can do. but from what i seen he looks very athletic. and IMO could be a star one day.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 15 July 2008, 08:05:04 AM
Quote from: Adampro123;7022
First off what does this have to do with drugs?

Several posts hyave mentioned the drug testing by one/both companies.
 
Quote from: Adampro123;7022
and no i don't do any.

Maybe, then, that is the problem.
 
Quote from: Adampro123;7022
second what is wrong with cage and morgan?

Maybe, as with your response to the drug idea, we should look at the reverse: What is right with them (if U can find anything).
 
Quote from: Adampro123;7022
cage is a great wrestler with loads of charisma and has put on great match after great match in TNA.

He is a good (not great) guy who left WWE on his own (or so I read), & did so b/c he saw his release coming, & knew news of that would attach negativity, etc. to his name &/or future in the industry.
 
Good (far from any great) matches he's had in TNA, have been due to carrying (just like Copeland did in WWE) by partners (Coalition, etc.) & opponents, perhaps a mix of those.
 
Quote from: Adampro123;7022
Morgan is a young guy who is big and has even yet to show all that he can do. but from what i seen he looks very athletic. and IMO could be a star one day.

He looked athletic in WWE, but when was the last time you saw him show-up (let alone show "all that he can do") there?
 
I have a feeling they're showing all these video pieces about him so fans can feel they know him/know more about him, & actually give a crap what happens to him in matches/storylines. (I also had & have the feeling TNA was protecting &/or hiding something when they started him out in Cornette's office, etc.)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 16 July 2008, 12:11:12 AM
Quote
I gotta believe anyone who's a TNA fan watches it while being on more drugs than the entire roster combined.

Well DAMNIT brother give me my daily steroids, I'm watching TNA! :lol2:

Yeah I don't really see your point here at all.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 16 July 2008, 12:42:29 AM
Quote from: The Franchise;7220
Well DAMNIT brother give me my daily steroids, I'm watching TNA! :lol2:

Yeah I don't really see your point here at all.


It's TJ, does that really surprise you at all?

I don't like TNA but I don't say that people that watch it are idiots, at least not seriously, lol

(other than House M.D., I hate that guy).
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 16 July 2008, 06:31:05 AM
Haha! You're all on drugs! Thats funny... I don't have a problem with TNA fans. Different people like different things. Some people like watching shitty shows. lol But either way, people have different opinions on stuff. Personally, I think TNA could eventually be a decent show. I've tried watching TNA. Last time I watched TNA was when they had this briefcase thing, where a few different people had brief cases. And the entire night, they acted like they would be opened that night. But they weren't. So I said ok, probably next week. Nope! So I said screw you TNA, I had enough of your shit. (Id watched it about a month.) I've watched a few shows since then here and there. And I was dissapointed that it wasn't any more worth watching. So I haven't watched it in about 2 months. I do plan on downloading the last PPV everyone said was so great.

In recent weeks, Booker T has been vocal with his  frustration. He has appeared to be happier with the direction his character  since turning heel. However, he had a melt down on the recent UK tour due to the  number of meet and greets he was asked to participate in and he was unhappy with  the lack of catering in the venues. A source claimed he threatened to leave the  tour unless TNA addressed the accommodation issues.

Shows how commited TNA stars are to the fans
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 16 July 2008, 07:28:56 AM
Thats a cheap shot. the TNA guys are very dedicated to there fans. if you ever went to a live event you would know that. there were wrestlers talking and meeting with people all over the place. i met abyss.

The one thing i can say is TNA guys go out there and bust there ass for the fans. and just because1 person booker had a  freaking melt down! you wanna say TNA guys aren't committed to there fans.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 16 July 2008, 07:31:05 AM
Im using that as an example. They may seem commited. But they could care less if they weren't forced.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 16 July 2008, 07:44:26 AM
Quote from: firewall316;7311
Im using that as an example. They may seem commited. But they could care less if they weren't forced.

Like i said at TNA events wrestlers go around talking and meeting with people and they aren't forced. if you went to a TNA event you would see how nice and down to earth these guys are for the most part.

give booker a break he had a meltdown and was in another country. and don't judge everyone off of his actions.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 16 July 2008, 07:50:52 AM
I'm not judging anyone. I'm just saying look at what its like backstage. You don't know who really gives a rats ass. Sure there are probably some nice people. And some really care. But you don't know who.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 16 July 2008, 08:40:37 PM
So Franchise can't see my point? Well, no problem for me; I knew TF's vision didn't work when they were seeing far more talent than I do on TNA shows. (I see some, but not near as much as some of you apparently do.)
 
Oh, & for the record: I went & saw a TNA event about 6-7 months ago, & I agree they're committed to their fans. (Got a ton of autographs from JB, Hebner, & several wrestlers long after show was over.) But, as I believe I posted before, that's b/c several of them know they:
 
1] Are lucky to have jobs in a that-size promotion, not to mention a free-nat'l-TV deal, & as many fans as we are. (The $ we pay for tix, PPVs, merch. keeps their company & careers going, esp. at the level they are.)
 
2] Need to be nice, etc. to us fans, or else we (1-by-1 or in grps.) will stop watching/paying-for/caring about them.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 17 July 2008, 04:21:16 PM
Quote from: TJChurch;7432
So Franchise can't see my point? Well, no problem for me; I knew TF's vision didn't work when they were seeing far more talent than I do on TNA shows. (I see some, but not near as much as some of you apparently do.)
 
Oh, & for the record: I went & saw a TNA event about 6-7 months ago, & I agree they're committed to their fans. (Got a ton of autographs from JB, Hebner, & several wrestlers long after show was over.) But, as I believe I posted before, that's b/c several of them know they:
 
1] Are lucky to have jobs in a that-size promotion, not to mention a free-nat'l-TV deal, & as many fans as we are. (The $ we pay for tix, PPVs, merch. keeps their company & careers going, esp. at the level they are.)
 
2] Need to be nice, etc. to us fans, or else we (1-by-1 or in grps.) will stop watching/paying-for/caring about them.


I never thought I'd say this, but I agree with you completely. WOW.

The only thing I would like to add is that I think it's unfair that a guy like Earl Hebner comes out and basically implies that WWE isn't committed to its fan. I will not disagree that TNA is committed to theirs (although they would be more committed if they put a good product on television, HEY-O!), but WWE has countless autograph signings where the wrestlers take time out of their personal schedules, basically to sit with fans for hours to sign.

Just because wrestlers don't stand around for hours after shows signing autographs for fans doesn't mean WWE isn't committed. People easily forget that WWE has a MUCH harder schedule than TNA.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Mini Kong on 17 July 2008, 04:34:46 PM
Agree Prax. Another thing I would like to add is that the security for the arenas or whatever can be dickheads about it too not just the wrestlers.

2 years ago after a house show in my hometown, alot of peope lined up on the side of the arena to watch the wrestlers leave. This is the first live WWE event EVER in my hometown mind you. So I was standing right by the car Kenny Dykstra and Mickie James came in (they were engaged during this time). When they walked to their car, instead of getting in, they proceed to go by and shake the hands of fans, but then after a while the security guard tells us to back up and they can't shake any more hands.

And before the event, me and my bro were at Lyfe Qwest gym and seen Kenny and Mickie driving into the parking lot. When they got out my bro yelled Kenny's name. Kenny says "How in the hell did you guys find us here" and laughs. Then he proceeded to talk to my bro and I was talking to mickie. We talked for about 15minutes.

The point I'm trying to get across is that, if wwe wasn't comitted to their fans then those two could of simply just waved and kept on walking into the gym like it was nobody's business, but instead they were curteous enough to strike up a convo during their personal time.

Of course you are gonna have those who will be like "fans? who cares?" both in the wwe and in tna. That's just the way people will always be.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Cannon on 17 July 2008, 05:31:45 PM
I don't post in this thread all that often because I understand TNA isn't good and I just accept it for what it is... But I saw something that offically makes it suck and is jut really pointless...

So today I am looking at confirmed matches for iMPACT tonight. So I come down and see a stretcher match between Consequnces Creed and Booker T.... Now tell me what in the **** is the point for a gimmick match between these two? They haven't been feuding or anything and to put them in a random gimmick match is stupid and makes no sense what so ever and that my friends right there is why TNA SUCKS....
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 17 July 2008, 06:22:49 PM
Wow no point in that match at all. hopefully there wil be a reason for it that will happen on impact but there shouldn't be a stretcher match until after a big feud.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 17 July 2008, 06:49:03 PM
Quote from: Prax;7557
I never thought I'd say this, but I agree with you completely. WOW.

The only thing I would like to add is that I think it's unfair that a guy like Earl Hebner comes out and basically implies that WWE isn't committed to its fan. I will not disagree that TNA is committed to theirs (although they would be more committed if they put a good product on television, HEY-O!), but WWE has countless autograph signings where the wrestlers take time out of their personal schedules, basically to sit with fans for hours to sign.

Just because wrestlers don't stand around for hours after shows signing autographs for fans doesn't mean WWE isn't committed. People easily forget that WWE has a MUCH harder schedule than TNA.

Thats pretty much what I've been trying to say. TNA has its wrestlers who are commited and ones who aren't. So does WWE. WWE has a much harder schedule. But a lot of them still find time to meet fans.

Also, thats something else I forgot to mention why I stopped watching TNA. Too many of these gimmick matches. And for no reason, like what is apparently happening tonight. Bad booking. Bad storylines. Bad business IMO.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 17 July 2008, 07:36:52 PM
World Heavyweight Champion CM Punk blew off every fan at a recent autograph signing WWE held just weeks before he won the gold. Yeah that's great way to show yourself to be the top man.

End of.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 17 July 2008, 07:43:49 PM
Well thanks for reopening the thread.

You have a soure for that? Like I just said, theres people in TNA(Booker T) and in WWE(According to you CM Punk.)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Zuccini on 19 July 2008, 06:43:35 PM
I still cant believe how many superstars TNA has takenfrom the WWE. Booker T and Kurt Angle were the two best heels we had pretty much. Now there gone and we are somewhat struggling
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J2M on 19 July 2008, 06:47:56 PM
Kurt Angle is the biggest loss we have had to TNA. It's a huge loss and to think what it'd be like if he were still in the WWE is hard to imagine. We could see some awesome new feuds of which we haven't seen. Damn, I want the Olympic Gold Medalist back in WWE now :( Won't happen though.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Zuccini on 19 July 2008, 06:51:20 PM
What makes you say he wont return although deep inside me i know it wont happen either?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 19 July 2008, 07:51:11 PM
Might happen if WWE buys TNA or something like that. I would agree Kurt Angle was the biggest loss. TNA can have Booker T.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 19 July 2008, 07:57:55 PM
Quote from: The Franchise;7685
World Heavyweight Champion CM Punk blew off every fan at a recent autograph signing WWE held just weeks before he won the gold. Yeah that's great way to show yourself to be the top man.
 
End of.
Actually that was just one fan who wanted CM Punk to sign a bunch of shit and was asking a ton of questions like he had "inside informantion". Tons of reports said Punk was respectful and that was one seperate incident. Asshole deserved to not even be at the signing.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Zuccini on 20 July 2008, 02:13:18 AM
Quote from: Ultramanits BLACK;8543
Actually that was just one fan who wanted CM Punk to sign a bunch of shit and was asking a ton of questions like he had "inside informantion". Tons of reports said Punk was respectful and that was one seperate incident. Asshole deserved to not even be at the signing.
Well I dnt blame him for getting angry. I would to. Some fans are so picky and  I hate that.
Anywayz I doubt the WWE will ever buy TNA. Its just too much if you ask me. Mcmahon has alot of money but I  still dont think he would have THAT much would he?
Which TNA superstars do yu think would be a good asset to the WWE?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 20 July 2008, 02:14:25 AM
Quote from: Zuccini;8573
Well I dnt blame him for getting angry. I would to. Some fans are so picky and  I hate that.
Anywayz I doubt the WWE will ever buy TNA. Its just too much if you ask me. Mcmahon has alot of money but I  still dont think he would have THAT much would he?
Which TNA superstars do yu think would be a good asset to the WWE?

Dude, Vince is a BILLIONAIRE, buying TNA would be small change to him.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Zuccini on 20 July 2008, 02:22:40 AM
Quote from: Mick Clique;8574
Dude, Vince is a BILLIONAIRE, buying TNA would be small change to him.
Haha Well still... I dont think he should buy out the business. It would eventually lead him to buying every wrestling business. Then WWE would have nothing to compete with right? And especially buying out TNA. They are WWEs rivals.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Mini Kong on 20 July 2008, 02:24:45 AM
Quote from: Zuccini;8576
Haha Well still... I dont think he should buy out the business. It would eventually lead him to buying every wrestling business. Then WWE would have nothing to compete with right? And especially buying out TNA. They are WWEs rivals.


WCW used to be his biggest rivals but it didn't stop him from buying that.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J2M on 20 July 2008, 04:41:11 PM
I think a lot of us are aware of the fact that Vince McMahon can buy over TNA if he really wanted too but it can work on both ends of the argument. You've got to think that had he wanted to buy the company he would have done it by now before it gains momentum and starts to really become a rival to the WWE. Or maybe he is just waiting for that so he can shut it down once it get's its front feet running. I mean, I'd like to see something like it happen though, he's a billionaire ffs, so he has got the money to do it. Question is, will he? :P
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 20 July 2008, 07:27:29 PM
Id like to see TNA move to Mondays first. And see some real good competition. I can watch RAW and tivo TNA. But eventually, TNA is going to lose one way or another. And honestly I don't think they are as much comeptition as WCW was.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 20 July 2008, 11:20:46 PM
Quote from: J2M;8473
Kurt Angle is the biggest loss we have had to TNA. It's a huge loss and to think what it'd be like if he were still in the WWE is hard to imagine. We could see some awesome new feuds of which we haven't seen. Damn, I want the Olympic Gold Medalist back in WWE now :( Won't happen though.

Kurt would've been a loss, except the timing of it.... They were using him the way they were, etc. b/c of his health. Seemed to me (@ least at the time, & some in TNA, too) that the biz became more important to him than his own future & family. (As evidenced by using his family onscreen in TNA.)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 21 July 2008, 01:28:22 AM
I think some of you are missing the reasons TNA hasn't sunk yet. They don't want to sell there company to vince. dixie carter seems to love TNA. and doesn't seem tio want to sell it. i really don't know much about this but i hear that most of TNAs money comes from panda energy? or something like that. im not sure but unless vinces is gonna buy that company which i think is bigger than him then i don't see vince buying TNA.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: firewall316 on 21 July 2008, 04:59:17 AM
Like the million dollar man would say... everyone has a price. but apparently TNA's price is pretty high.

- Neilson Corporation offered to buy TNA in May 2005 for $10,000,000 USD from Panda Energy; however, Panda Energy expressed no interest. Morphoplex, a major TNA sponsor, offered Panda Energy $20,000,000 USD for the company later that month, which was also rejected.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 21 July 2008, 09:27:35 PM
Dixie Carter won't sell TNA. Plus I know she can't because of the company's hierarchy structure, any move she would make to sell the company would have to go through Double J first as Jeff Jarrett is 1st/2nd in charge. Like I and Adam said before, she won't sell the company and VKM will never own TNA. (Y)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 21 December 2008, 09:45:19 AM
I'm really sorry but...

Bump.

:D
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Big Texy Cool on 21 December 2008, 09:51:18 AM
NO. BAD. BAD PRAX, and I thought you were supposed to be an Mod around here :P


But yeah, anyway a little while ago I would have been defending TNA because of the Main Event Mafia vs Frontline angle, but then they had to go and add in Rhino and Team 3D which completely ruined the entire thing for me. Not to mention the involvement of Al Snow at the last PPV, I mean seriously? Al Snow, what the hell has he done to prove he should be anywhere NEAR a ring?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 21 December 2008, 09:58:53 AM
Exactly... just when you think they're about to do something good, they go ahead and ruin it with something completely random and stupid. I'll be the first to admit that I respect their wrestling style (I used to find it spotty but I've come to appreciate a lot of guys there). The truth is though that it is and has always been a circus.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 23 December 2008, 02:18:34 AM
Right now. TNA Sucks.

lets push Team 3D and rhino over all the young guys so you have 8 old guys and 2 "young guys" around the main event. yeah really smart TNA.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Mini Kong on 23 December 2008, 04:17:09 PM
I was really starting to get some interest in TNA when the whole Frontline vs MEM thing but the last few weeks it has sucked hard core. The only thing I've been pleased with them doing is firing Curry Man which will eventually lead to Christopher Daniels coming back I hope. And the Knockout's division is starting to go down hill too. And what's up with the all the black women being heels? Are we really that mean? :@ (lmao)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J.D on 23 December 2008, 04:30:56 PM
I have lost all interest in TNA, I think it was just a temporary craze. I still keep fairly updated on matters such as champions etc. The fact of the matter is that I always feel like I'm watching a really tacky version of WWE and I can never shake that feeling off despite wrestling being about talent and not money. TNA seems to be losing some good stars as well, first Ron Killings and now Cage should be coming back to WWE.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 24 December 2008, 10:22:07 AM
Interesting points of view. I'm still sticking by TNA, yes there are some things I disagree with but I think from a Television perspective TNA has never been better and the majority agree with me as TNA's ratings are staying strong compared to Joe's reign of the 0.9/1.0's.

Quote
It was reported on Saturday that the 12/18 edition of TNA Impact last week drew a 1.0 cable rating according to PWInsider. It is now being reported by The Wrestling Observer/Figure Four Online that show actually did a 1.2 cable rating (or a 1.17) with 1.6 million viewers.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 26 December 2008, 05:53:42 AM
No one's going to deny that it's impressive that they've been able to sustain and even improve some of their ratings, especially considering how **** their product is these days. But hey. their product's always going to appeal to someone (in their case horny old men), just like WWE appeals to little boys these days.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Mini Kong on 26 December 2008, 08:12:20 PM
Okay I want to know is what in the hell is with the Sarah Palin Impersonator? It would of made some since if TNA had this going on during actual election time, but doing it now when no one cares is just absolutely pointless and stupid.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Cannon on 26 December 2008, 08:16:10 PM
TNA is reaching a new height in suckage by allowing Mick Foley to climb into the ring and wrestle... What a ****ing train wreck that will be.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Mini Kong on 26 December 2008, 08:23:19 PM
Quote from: Chupacabra;20441
TNA is reaching a new height in suckage by allowing Mick Foley to climb into the ring and wrestle... What a ****ing train wreck that will be.


These were my thoughts exactly when I watched him clean house against the MEM. Steiner and Nash basically ran up to him and stood there waiting for him to hit them.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 27 December 2008, 01:40:41 AM
I don't have a problem with foley being in a match beings its a 6 man tag and he won't actually be in the ring for long. but i don't like the team itself. AJ,Foley and Devon. should be joe in there instead of Devon.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Cannon on 27 December 2008, 10:02:21 PM
Everytime TNA takes a step forward they take 3 steps backward. This whole MEM Vs Frontline had a good chance at being awesome if booked right. The start was done well but as the storyline progresses it is just getting worse and Foley getting into it and wrestling is lame.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Big Texy Cool on 28 December 2008, 11:13:26 AM
Quote from: Adampro123;20461
I don't have a problem with foley being in a match beings its a 6 man tag and he won't actually be in the ring for long. but i don't like the team itself. AJ,Foley and Devon. should be joe in there instead of Devon.

As much as I don't like Joe I agree he should be in there. But I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that he just had a kid so he'll probably be out of action for a while, hopefull he can get back soon and take one of those other fat asses spots.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J2M on 5 March 2009, 11:48:42 PM
I know this is a bump, but I didn't want to start a new thread on the same thing I had in mind. You see, I've never really been able to watch a full TNA show due to the fact it was never shown on Australian television, but just two weeks ago it premiered on cable tv here and I was actually excited of the prospect of possibly becoming a TNA fan, but I was left extremely disappointed after watching two and half episodes of the show.

The whole show is pretty much corny segments, one-after the other. I mean if the segments weren't so pathetically bad, I don't think I wouldn't mind as much but watching segments with guys like Abyss and Shark Boy is just boring and makes me want to change the channel. And what really got me is how TNA had a segment for Mick Foley called something like "Hardcore History 101", where basically he talked about his favorite hardcore matches which were all surrounding the WWE. :lol

Is Jeff Jarret so outrageously stupid to even give time to have a superstar talk about the good things of WWE and it's history, because when you mention another show on your show it's recognised as advertising, and will have people tune into the other show to see the 'great things' which were mentioned on the show. It's stupid, and not something a business-man would even consider.

The only thing on TNA that interested me was the X-Division as personally I am fond of guys like Alex Shelley, Chris Sabin and Consequences Creed. I enjoyed the match they were in but still it wasn't given the time and care it was needed. Personally the way to build TNA would be to give more concern to the X-Division as this could be their next great stars, which minus Sting, they haven't achieved yet.

Overall, the name of this thread expresses my concerns on TNA.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 6 March 2009, 12:01:13 AM
Quote from: J2M;23508


The whole show is pretty much corny segments, one-after the other. I mean if the segments weren't so pathetically bad, I don't think I wouldn't mind as much but watching segments with guys like Abyss and Shark Boy is just boring and makes me want to change the channel.


They gave a shark boy segment in the last couple of weeks? hmm i wonder if that means people in america get different segments because i haven't seen shark boy since he lost to brutis magnus about a month ago.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J2M on 6 March 2009, 12:06:49 AM
Quote from: Adampro123;23509
They gave a shark boy segment in the last couple of weeks? hmm i wonder if that means people in america get different segments because i haven't seen shark boy since he lost to brutis magnus about a month ago.

It was more so just an example of the type of segments I've seen on TNA, maybe I should've stated someone else to avoid confusion ..
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: JayDee on 6 March 2009, 04:15:47 AM
Funny you should suggest TNA focus on their X-Division to make the company shine because that is what made them in the first place. Then they just shit on that division and the talent involved in that division.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: WeedMan420 on 6 March 2009, 04:57:56 AM
TNA can be a great show, the wrestling is great, I actually watch the womens matches because they...know how to wrestle but ya, the segments are just stupid and corny. They're just trying to make it like the WWE with all the stupid storylines.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Biohazared20 on 10 March 2009, 03:35:09 AM
I have been wanting to rant about this for a while but I didn't think it deserved a whole thread so I thought this would be the place to do it, ok I really really hate what there doing with Mike Tenay and Don West, in that there trying to make Don a heel announcer and now I wouldn't really have a problem with that but the way there doing it is just stupid, first Don goes on some rant about how Mike didn't defend him in some meeting and his anger just sounded so fake it was just annoying and then the next night when he's on commentary he's starting to cheer for the heel's but once again this anger he has sounds so fake and stupid I don't see why there doing this but to be honost I never really cared for Don Wes as a annoncer however I can say one good thing that has come out of this is that he leaves in the middle of the show and we don't have to hear from him for the rest of the night
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 10 March 2009, 09:26:39 PM
What's weird is the reason i enjoy it is because it's so stupid. or maybe because its at least something different from the almost 7 years they have been doing it. don west sounds so forced and like you said fake and im sitting at home laughing my ass off at him. so i enjoy it for the wrong reasons. you you're right. i mean just because him and tenay had issues doesn't mean to completely change everything about himself. but then again thats TNA for ya.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Mini Kong on 14 March 2009, 06:49:58 PM
I watch IMPACT for two reasons. Scott Steiner promos (the guy is freakin hilarious) and Velvet Sky. I seen the episode where Don West went of on Tenay. Needless to say his heel turn is completely laughable. Adam is right. He does sound completely forced. No matter how "bad" he tries to sound, it still sounds like he is trying to sell baseball cards. And the whole thing with Don West turning to alcohol is completely over doing it.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 25 March 2009, 09:39:30 AM
You know those times when your feeling down and in need of a laugh? That's what this thread is for! Keep up the great work guys, because I can't stop laughing my ass off when I'm reading this. TNA Sucks? Well that's entirely your opinion and tbh, the more you lot hate it, the more determined I am to love it. Because I actually want to watch it while I can bet 99% of the individuals here don't give 2 shits if they see it or not. TNA iMPACT is THE highlight of my TV week, and that's coming from a guy who absolutely hated iMPACT for the first 3-4 years or so ,and it will stay that highlight way while TNA keeps going the way they are and not the way Vince says they should which is "We are PG and they are TV-14, They need to change with the times". No we don't because I don't want to go back to the cartoonish garbage you turned your once really, really, phenomenally great product into. If that happens it's ROH or bust for me.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 25 March 2009, 10:13:16 AM
Well I'm glad you enjoy it franchise i wish i could do the same but oh well.

But i gotta say you kind of seem like you're drunk right now with what you been posting and what not.lol

good to see you back at mayhem for a bit though.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 26 March 2009, 01:52:19 AM
[QUOTE=The Franchise
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 26 March 2009, 09:45:27 AM
Quote from: Prax;24930
[quote=The Franchise
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: squeaksjr on 26 March 2009, 09:48:10 AM
i like tna but as soon as i saw the empty arena match i cant take tna seriously anymore, the only bit i enjoy is team 3d and beer money, suicide is over hyped, the mem is just boring and mick managed to make me laugh recently but thats not enough
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 26 March 2009, 08:49:28 PM
[quote=The Franchise
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 28 March 2009, 02:44:01 PM
[QUOTE=The Franchise
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 30 March 2009, 12:24:52 AM
A) The comparisons were all about ages.

B) I still stand by murders not being cartoonish.

C) I hated TNA iMPACT till very late last year, something I never bottled up. But instead of coming on here and bitching about what TNA did wrong this week, last week, last month, whenever, I kept it to myself. Having negative thoughts about something eventually builds up into a detest for it and I won't let that happen, again, thank you very much Vincent Kennedy McMahon.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 1 April 2009, 04:27:10 AM
[QUOTE=The Franchise
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 1 April 2009, 11:42:26 PM
Quote from: Prax;25447
[quote=The Franchise
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 2 April 2009, 12:24:09 AM
[QUOTE=The Franchise
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 2 April 2009, 12:32:43 AM
Prax hasn't destroyed the TNA section. it's more of there just isn't many people here that is interested in TNA and there isn't many people liking the product they are putting on right now.

no matter of prax or anyone's opinion of TNA if there was more TNA fans here then the TNA section would be more active.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Biohazared20 on 2 April 2009, 06:10:39 AM
To be honost I don't know why I still watch however I haven't missed a week of it even though I don't really enjoy what I see or hear but most of the time it's on I am on my computer so I am really just listening to it unlike Raw or Smackdown where I actually pay attention to what's going on
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 2 April 2009, 10:09:20 AM
Quote from: Prax;25546
[quote=The Franchise
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 2 April 2009, 11:31:58 PM
[QUOTE=The Franchise
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Franchise on 3 April 2009, 02:30:09 AM
i LOVE prax, and yes im very pissed (drunk)J (Y)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J.D on 6 April 2009, 06:24:24 AM
[QUOTE=The Franchise
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 6 April 2009, 06:29:28 AM
Quote from: John Doe;25813
I don't get how they had three top mark stars for pushing talent (Kurt Angle, Booker T and Sting) decent wrestlers like Rhino and Christian and a load of fresh young and athletic talent and managed to get to a point where the storyline is like a bad episode of Recess.

Let's start with how Angle largeky keft WWE b/c they kept him from wrestling for a whiile b/c they knew he wsn't medically right.
 
Christian's a tag star (E&C, Tomko, the Coalition) who (don't believe the rumors) left WWE the first time b/c he saw his release coming quickly.
 
Booker (& esp. Sting, Steiner, & Nash, from least- to most-obviously) are has-beens who are living off the fumes of what they did in the past. (That's the real reason for the MEM even forming.)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J.D on 6 April 2009, 06:50:02 AM
Who cares about that? They had Samoa Joe, AJ Styles, Kazarian, Christopher daniels, Eric Young and HEAPS more and they still manage to make it suck! The storylines are childish and the show looks extremely tacky. My brother (used to be a fan of wrestling about 7 years ago) couldn't believe Kurt Angle was in a show which looks like a school production. I half expect Kurt angle to walk out and say "OH YES I HAVE" and then the audience to say "OH NO YOU HAVEN'T" and then hear a song about a genie or some magic beans.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 6 April 2009, 06:52:51 AM
Quote from: John Doe;25818
Who cares about that? They had Samoa Joe, AJ Styles, Kazarian, Christopher daniels, Eric Young and HEAPS more and they still manage to make it suck!

That's why Cornett made the comment he did a few weeks ago, about guys like Sting & Angle taking-up all the time; He wants the fans to think that soon (maybe after Lockdown), he'll get the young guys with actual talent back on-air.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J.D on 6 April 2009, 06:55:53 AM
Quote from: TJChurch;25819
Quote from: John Doe;25818
Who cares about that? They had Samoa Joe, AJ Styles, Kazarian, Christopher daniels, Eric Young and HEAPS more and they still manage to make it suck!

 
That's why Cornett made the comment he did a few weeks ago, about guys like Sting & Angle taking-up all the time; He wants the fans to think that soon (maybe after Lockdown), he'll get the young guys with actual talent back on-air.


Well why not do that in the first place rather than have a load of old blokes, lose a load of fans and then decide to bring the talent back into the picture. What is the logic in that?
That's like me having the choice of eating a good meal or a bad meal and choosing the bad meal because then people might think I eat the good meal afterwards, it makes no sense.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 6 April 2009, 06:59:31 AM
Quote from: John Doe;25820
Well why not do that in the first place rather than have a load of old blokes, lose a load of fans and then decide to bring the talent back into the picture. What is the logic in that?
That's like me having the choice of eating a good meal or a bad meal and choosing the bad meal because then people might think I eat the good meal afterwards, it makes no sense.

You might not know the bad is bad with nothing to compare it to. Now that you've seen how low they can go, you'll notice (& probably be more appreciative) when they get better.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J.D on 6 April 2009, 07:11:16 AM
Quote from: TJChurch;25821
Quote from: John Doe;25820
Well why not do that in the first place rather than have a load of old blokes, lose a load of fans and then decide to bring the talent back into the picture. What is the logic in that?
That's like me having the choice of eating a good meal or a bad meal and choosing the bad meal because then people might think I eat the good meal afterwards, it makes no sense.

 
You might not know the bad is bad with nothing to compare it to. Now that you've seen how low they can go, you'll notice (& probably be more appreciative) when they get better.


Yeah I would know it's bad because I could compare it to WWE which is a much better company. Plus I want consistency in a show, I wouldn't appreciate it being bad then getting good because I would think why didn't they just make it good in the first place rather than waste my time and the wrestlers careers with the most ridiculous storylines involving the most ridiculous stars on the roster, even by wrestling standards it's ridiculous.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 6 April 2009, 07:13:15 AM
Quote from: John Doe;25823
Yeah I would know it's bad because I could compare it to WWE which is a much better company. Plus I want consistency in a show, I wouldn't appreciate it being bad then getting good because I would think why didn't they just make it good in the first place rather than waste my time and the wrestlers careers with the most ridiculous storylines involving the most ridiculous stars on the roster, even by wrestling standards it's ridiculous.

Try comparing both companies overall. WWE has a lot of better talent, but both sides also have soime crap... And I guarantee if you watch both shows enough, you'll see on any given episode, they have a little bit of the good & some of the worse.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 8 April 2009, 12:10:14 AM
Quote from: TJChurch;25824
Quote from: John Doe;25823
Yeah I would know it's bad because I could compare it to WWE which is a much better company. Plus I want consistency in a show, I wouldn't appreciate it being bad then getting good because I would think why didn't they just make it good in the first place rather than waste my time and the wrestlers careers with the most ridiculous storylines involving the most ridiculous stars on the roster, even by wrestling standards it's ridiculous.

 
Try comparing both companies overall. WWE has a lot of better talent, but both sides also have soime crap... And I guarantee if you watch both shows enough, you'll see on any given episode, they have a little bit of the good & some of the worse.



The problem is, whereas both companies might have their proportionate amounts of crap, WWE doesn't push it all to the stars. I mean, really, is there a BAD wrestler in the main event right now in WWE? People hate Cena but the guy can actually work, same with Batista... Henry gets some attention once in a while but he's not in the main event, same with Khali... and even so, those BAD wrestlers are used simply to eventually put over good ones by making them look good...

TNA's main event is a bunch of old guys holding down the roster Triple H style...and while some of them (angle) are good wrestlers, the really good wrestlers in the x-division and even the heavyweights are held down so much it doesn't make sense.

So while the rosters may be similar, it's in how they're used.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 8 April 2009, 12:47:31 AM
Quote from: Prax;25931
The problem is, whereas both companies might have their proportionate amounts of crap, WWE doesn't push it all to the stars. I mean, really, is there a BAD wrestler in the main event right now in WWE? People hate Cena but the guy can actually work, same with Batista... Henry gets some attention once in a while but he's not in the main event, same with Khali... and even so, those BAD wrestlers are used simply to eventually put over good ones by making them look good...
 
TNA's main event is a bunch of old guys holding down the roster Triple H style...and while some of them (angle) are good wrestlers, the really good wrestlers in the x-division and even the heavyweights are held down so much it doesn't make sense.
 
So while the rosters may be similar, it's in how they're used.

Letting the comment about Angle being good go...
 
I agree with what you say about the bad guys in WWE being used to push the good ones, but the key is that word "eventually"... SOmetimes, that means a day, but sometimes closer to a year of the same fued. (Like the slower ones that began with Y2J-HBK, tho I'm not saying either of them is bad.) Then, you have things like HHH-Orton, or Edge-Cena, both short & largely with good stars (don't get me started on Release Kid Ordinary), but "done to death".
 
Not to mention that when Mafia started & AJ-Joe (before that even had a name), I thought they might start using that to have the veterans push some stars... But with the MEM yet to disband, & Joe's feud with 1 MEM member seeming to have "only just begun", I doubt it.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 8 April 2009, 01:39:28 AM
Quote from: TJChurch;25938
Quote from: Prax;25931
The problem is, whereas both companies might have their proportionate amounts of crap, WWE doesn't push it all to the stars. I mean, really, is there a BAD wrestler in the main event right now in WWE? People hate Cena but the guy can actually work, same with Batista... Henry gets some attention once in a while but he's not in the main event, same with Khali... and even so, those BAD wrestlers are used simply to eventually put over good ones by making them look good...
 
TNA's main event is a bunch of old guys holding down the roster Triple H style...and while some of them (angle) are good wrestlers, the really good wrestlers in the x-division and even the heavyweights are held down so much it doesn't make sense.
 
So while the rosters may be similar, it's in how they're used.

 
Letting the comment about Angle being good go...
 
I agree with what you say about the bad guys in WWE being used to push the good ones, but the key is that word "eventually"... SOmetimes, that means a day, but sometimes closer to a year of the same fued. (Like the slower ones that began with Y2J-HBK, tho I'm not saying either of them is bad.) Then, you have things like HHH-Orton, or Edge-Cena, both short & largely with good stars (don't get me started on Release Kid Ordinary), but "done to death".
 
Not to mention that when Mafia started & AJ-Joe (before that even had a name), I thought they might start using that to have the veterans push some stars... But with the MEM yet to disband, & Joe's feud with 1 MEM member seeming to have "only just begun", I doubt it.


well yes, the key word is eventually, but those people have to be over themselves in order to get other people over. Sure, they can get over solely on their size or power or whatever else they have, but you have to introduce them to the fans and get them used to this person being a powerhouse before you have him put someone over.

This is why Khali needs a win every once in a while between losses to Cena or Undertaker or who ever, or else he's just another big guy and that tactic loses credibility.

so Khali in WWE, who serves a purpose, as we've established...

vs. Kevin nash and Scott Steiner in TNA, who serve no purpose other then to spreak their has-been name value.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 8 April 2009, 04:16:54 AM
Quote from: Prax;25942
well yes, the key word is eventually, but those people have to be over themselves in order to get other people over. Sure, they can get over solely on their size or power or whatever else they have, but you have to introduce them to the fans and get them used to this person being a powerhouse before you have him put someone over.
 
This is why Khali needs a win every once in a while between losses to Cena or Undertaker or who ever, or else he's just another big guy and that tactic loses credibility.
 
so Khali in WWE, who serves a purpose, as we've established...
 
vs. Kevin nash and Scott Steiner in TNA, who serve no purpose other then to spreak their has-been name value.

Well, at least they have that value. Khali doesn't.
 
That is precisely why they are already known to the fans, which makes them able to put newer, lesser-known guys over... Whereas all Khali can do is kill time.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: The Embassy on 9 April 2009, 04:20:44 AM
TNA actually has some of the best international wrestlers globally, if you look at it. Wrestlers especially Christopher Daniels who helped train John Cena and Somoa Joe are very good in ring wrestlers. In addition, guys like Alex Shelley and Chris Sabin have done so much in ring wise for TNA since 2003-2004. Sabin beginning his TNA career in 2003 and Shelley in 2004.

From my perspective, TNA went down hill after signing more and more WWE stars. This was a move purely to obtain higher ratings, but this plan also backfired, because if you look at it the ratings have not gone up tremendously, and comparatively, the matches have been providing less effort, the X division is a sheer of its former self, and the booking decisions and storylines are dull or confusing to the audience. TNA now sucks to how it use to be.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 9 April 2009, 04:40:56 AM
Quote from: The Embassy;26019
From my perspective, TNA went down hill after signing more and more WWE stars. This was a move purely to obtain higher ratings, but this plan also backfired, because if you look at it the ratings have not gone up tremendously, and comparatively, the matches have been providing less effort, the X division is a sheer of its former self, and the booking decisions and storylines are dull or confusing to the audience. TNA now sucks to how it use to be.

Signing them was a good idea, but they need new contract negotiators... Many of these guys had already started to believe their own hype (ANgle & Nash, I mean you), & if you also give them big money, they'll make the show all about them whether you like it or not.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 9 April 2009, 02:47:34 PM
Quote from: The Embassy;26019
TNA actually has some of the best international wrestlers globally, if you look at it. Wrestlers especially Christopher Daniels who helped train John Cena and Somoa Joe are very good in ring wrestlers. In addition, guys like Alex Shelley and Chris Sabin have done so much in ring wise for TNA since 2003-2004. Sabin beginning his TNA career in 2003 and Shelley in 2004.
 
From my perspective, TNA went down hill after signing more and more WWE stars. This was a move purely to obtain higher ratings, but this plan also backfired, because if you look at it the ratings have not gone up tremendously, and comparatively, the matches have been providing less effort, the X division is a sheer of its former self, and the booking decisions and storylines are dull or confusing to the audience. TNA now sucks to how it use to be.

pretty much exactly what I've been saying all along. I love some of the wrestlers in TNA. Eric Young is actually my favorite wrestler in any promotion. Daniels is amazing. MCMG is one of the best tag teams since the attitude era, certainly a top 5 maybe top 3 tag team today.
 
But they all get buried... for no reason then to satisfy the egos of over the hill wrestlers who get a 10th chance they didn't deserve because of Panda Energy's deep pockets and Dixie Carter's and Vince Russo's peanut sized brains.
 
TNA sucks. (Y)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: TJChurch on 10 April 2009, 12:20:35 AM
I bought a ticket to TNA the last time they came to town (w/in walking distance), but only about 5 minutes before the show started.
 
I can't say I enjoyed a single match, or even recall what they were. Even so, I bough a Guns shirt, & pics of them & AJ. I then got autog.'s from them, Hebner, Devine (X Cham @ the time), Storm, Shark, & a few others I don't recall... Yes, I already have my ticket for when they come at the end of the month.
 
However, the one thing I recall about that night is it was a Saturday, & during the time they still aired the repeats that night. I came home, watched it, & fell asleep wondering why I'd soent the $ to see crap like tey'd just aired on TV. (Summarize: Live events awesome, show sucked then & worse now. Explain that if U can.)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 20 April 2009, 03:58:03 AM
(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.thesun.co.uk%2Fmultimedia%2Farchive%2F00619%2Fmick_foley-280_619059a.jpg&hash=ef324d2b0a390c38f557f2ae0808bb103f2cc063)

BANG BANG!
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Captain Carefree on 20 April 2009, 04:01:38 AM
*Shakes Head*
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 21 April 2009, 03:45:03 AM
So I was bored and decided to find a stream for Lockdown. Part of it was because I was interested in seeing who these former champions were and the other part was because i've heard people have been bigging up TNA the last few weeks so I thought it would give it a fair crack of the whip and see if they could grab me to become a fan. I didn't tune in up until the conclusion of the Abyss / Matt Morgan match just before "Dr Stevie" arrived on our screens.

The first thing that pissed me off was pretty much as soon as I tuned in and that was Mike Tenay acting all super shocked and holy shit when he saw Dr Stevies face and realised it was Stevie Richards. Maybe that was just me being nitpicky but it really bugged me. I can't say I was a fan of the announcement team as a whole but Tenay was semi-bareable but that idiot alongside him just made me question why the fuck I bothered to watch it in the first place, that's how he bad he sounded.

Secondly and quite importantly was the awful camera work / production truck thingy and who decides what angles are being shown and what not, production I think it is :lol So towards the end of that Knockouts Title match Angelina Love looked to take a legit bump which shook her up and seemingly caused the match ending to be changed quickly which was fair enough. So while Love was trying to recover and talking to the ref what did the production crew decide to do? That's right, they decided that the people at home needed a superclose up so we could see them having the conversation. Moronic. Fast forward to the Lethal Lockdown match and the part where the roof was placed on. Who was the brightspark that decided that a camera was needed on every side of the cage and that for a good minute or two intervals during the match decided that we should have our screen littered with a tiny shot from everyone of those cameras?

Maybe I missed it in the actual match, or maybe they announced it early in the show i'm not sure, but I don't ever recall the announcers actually running over the rules for the Lethal Lockdown match. Now for people who regularaly watch I guess it's not exactly a problem but I didn't have a fucking clue on what was going on.

I'm not going to judge the actual in-ring quality as it wouldn't be fair to do so, but everything outside of it just seemed and felt so amateurish. Maybe it's because it's new to me but everything from the stage, to the announcer to the two points I previously mentioned but that's how it came off to me.

Oh yeah, I barely even recognized Kurt in his ring gear, he looked ill and I don't mean it in the way it's used by the likes of SF. I take it he's pretty much off the juice now as he looked ultra thin?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Mini Kong on 21 April 2009, 05:37:56 AM
Quote from: Mick Clique;26703


Secondly and quite importantly was the awful camera work / production truck thingy and who decides what angles are being shown and what not, production I think it is :lol So towards the end of that Knockouts Title match Angelina Love looked to take a legit bump which shook her up and seemingly caused the match ending to be changed quickly which was fair enough. So while Love was trying to recover and talking to the ref what did the production crew decide to do? That's right, they decided that the people at home needed a superclose up so we could see them having the conversation. Moronic.


Yeah you can obviously tell that the ending was pretty much improvised. They showed a close up of  Angelina Love laying on the ground and she looked completely out of it.

That match was really good up to that point, which I'm not going to hold against the ladies in the match because of the circumstance. I mean how often do you see a woman like Kong do a front flip off the rope? LOL. And Velvet Sky tying her extensions to the cage was pretty fucked up and funny at the same time.

Here is my mini rant I had on Pala's forum:

"I don't have too much time to write a very detailed review so I'm going to make this pretty brief. I enjoyed this PPV and it started out pretty promising but there are a few things that made me shake my head. The first being Bobby Lashley, but that's just a personal thing being I'm not a fan of him by any means. And the second was Mick Foley winning the title. I didn't expect the match being a classic since Mick isn't really know for wrestling classic matches unless there are foreign objects involved. Why would you take a title off of someone when the ratings have been record breaking (in TNA's case) recently? I thought Mick Foley came to TNA to help the younger guys. How does winning the title benefit them and the company's future? I swear it seems like every time TNA takes a step forward they take about 4 of them backwards. They took a step forward with a really good episode of IMPACT going into the PPV and they took 3 steps back by slapping the title on someone like Mick Foley."

There are only two reasons why I watch IMPACT now:

Christopher Daniels and the Knockout's division.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 16 May 2009, 04:56:45 PM
Bump :)

Does anyone else think we should just merge every thread in this section into this thread? :lol
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 17 May 2009, 11:03:12 AM
Overall the last few weeks of Impact have been pretty good. at least a lot better than raw which isn't saying much at all but still its been watchable. at least for me. i have enjoyed the tag team tourny and the who is suicide stuff and the old guys have really gotten me into there story (sting,Foley,JJ & angle) which is something i thought i would never say. Joe has been kicking ass again and i like what they are doing with Eric Young with him wanting his oppertunity. it was also great to see amazing red back in TNA i hope they put the X belt on him sometime this year.

only problems for me right now is they have joe vs Nash at Sacrifice and AJ vs Book at sacrifice and they haven't really built those 2 matches at all within the last ew weeks.

but im expecting the PPV to pretty much be a let down and for the whole product to go back downhill like they always do when it becomes decent.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Mini Kong on 20 May 2009, 03:34:56 PM
Quote from: Adampro123;27839
. it was also great to see amazing red back in TNA i hope they put the X belt on him sometime this year.


I thought he was already back in TNA?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 23 May 2009, 04:18:45 PM
Here's another reason why TNA sucks, thanks to wrestlezone:

Quote
For those who keep track of these statistical tidbits, ECW had 24 minutes and 37 seconds of in-ring wrestling action on their one-hour show this week as compared to 17 minutes and 49 seconds of in-ring wrestling action in the two-hour TNA iMPACT! show.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 24 May 2009, 11:59:54 AM
to play devils advocate a show can still be a good show even if it doesn't have much wrestling on it....

But seriously that is ridiculous! especially with the talent they have they could be putting on some good matches.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J2M on 25 May 2009, 01:34:30 PM
As it goes for the product their aiming for with the WWE Rejects whether they be big or small, TNA need to realize that fans don't want to tune into to watch washed up WWE/WCW rejects, they want to see something new and diverse.
 
I'm not big on TNA but jeez, they've got loads of potential with their roster yet they have guys like Kurt Angle (yes good wrestler but takes up way too much lime-light), Booker T and etc leading the show. I said it elsewhere, if TNA started using their first source guys like AJ Styles, Robert Roode, Samoa Joe, Alex Shelley, Chris Sabin, Jay Lethal etc as their main men I'd watch every week.
 
When people tune into TNA part of it is to get away from the WWE, but when you turn it in on it's like a wannabe version of the WWE..
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Axel on 25 May 2009, 04:44:28 PM
Quote from: Vintage Prax;28246
Here's another reason why TNA sucks, thanks to wrestlezone:

Quote
For those who keep track of these statistical tidbits, ECW had 24 minutes and 37 seconds of in-ring wrestling action on their one-hour show this week as compared to 17 minutes and 49 seconds of in-ring wrestling action in the two-hour TNA iMPACT! show.
You do realize they are talking about one week of Impact right?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Mini Kong on 25 May 2009, 05:01:25 PM
Quote from: Sycho Shanti;28024
Quote from: Adampro123;27839
. it was also great to see amazing red back in TNA i hope they put the X belt on him sometime this year.


Amazing Red vs Suicide during IMPACT this week. I watched the preshow to Sacrifice and he was way over. I think they should put the belt on him and take it off of Suicide ASAP because I think Kaz needs to spend a bit more time in the gym and getting back to ring shape.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 25 May 2009, 05:04:47 PM
Quote from: Axel;28354
Quote from: Vintage Prax;28246
Here's another reason why TNA sucks, thanks to wrestlezone:
 
Quote
For those who keep track of these statistical tidbits, ECW had 24 minutes and 37 seconds of in-ring wrestling action on their one-hour show this week as compared to 17 minutes and 49 seconds of in-ring wrestling action in the two-hour TNA iMPACT! show.
You do realize they are talking about one week of Impact right?

Do you realize that ECW normally beats Impact in amount of wrestling during the show? This is a trend, and even if it only happened once (and it happens just about every week), it's unacceptable.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 28 May 2009, 01:44:25 AM
Quote
sources: The Sun, PWInsider.com
-- Former WCW wrestler Marcus "Buff" Bagwell, 39, has been telling friends he's headed to TNA. Bagwell last appeared in TNA in 2006.

Quote
-- Former WWE superstars Elijah Burke and Shawn "Gavin" Spears are backstage at tonight's TNA iMPACT! tapings and expected to wrestle.

All i'm going to add is :tumble
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 28 May 2009, 01:45:46 AM
:giggle Buff Bagwell. I wonder how anyone can defend that :lol
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: chappers on 28 May 2009, 09:27:40 AM
I swear TNA seems to sign a new wrestler each week...
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Axel on 28 May 2009, 04:51:56 PM
Quote from: Vintage Prax;28447
:giggle Buff Bagwell. I wonder how anyone can defend that :lol
In a interview Buff denied those rumors.

Elijah Burke has been in talks with TNA since last year. If they sign him, it would be the best thing they've done, simply because WWE dropped the ball with him.

WWE also dropped the ball with Gaven Spears which could have been a major heel for ECW but no. They would rather spend time on Mark Henry or somebody else with no talent at all.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 28 May 2009, 06:50:59 PM
Quote from: Axel;28467
Quote from: Vintage Prax;28447
:giggle Buff Bagwell. I wonder how anyone can defend that :lol
In a interview Buff denied those rumors.
 
Elijah Burke has been in talks with TNA since last year. If they sign him, it would be the best thing they've done, simply because WWE dropped the ball with him.
 
WWE also dropped the ball with Gaven Spears which could have been a major heel for ECW but no. They would rather spend time on Mark Henry or somebody else with no talent at all.

Kevin nash? Scott Steiner? Mick Foley (in the ring anyway)? At least WWE isn't mooching.
 
And to be fair the only reason even still around is because he has a ridiculous contract that they can't get rid of.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Axel on 28 May 2009, 09:19:32 PM
WWE aren't saints nor are they holy in the wrestling biz. TNA is trying to improve, and keep jobs for wrestlers that still have passion for the business.

I don't see that from WWE, they somehow always find away to mis-use talent and release superstars that could go places but they keep around useless wrestlers like Punjab, Festus, Hornsoggle and Mark Henry.

Don't even get me started on Batista.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 28 May 2009, 10:02:56 PM
Quote from: Axel;28470
WWE aren't saints nor are they holy in the wrestling biz. TNA is trying to improve, and keep jobs for wrestlers that still have passion for the business.
 
I don't see that from WWE, they somehow always find away to mis-use talent and release superstars that could go places but they keep around useless wrestlers like Punjab, Festus, Hornsoggle and Mark Henry.
 
Don't even get me started on Batista.

no one said the WWE were saints. I think you'll see an adequate amount of negative posts about the WWE from me or just about anyone else. And I think it's more a case of you not liking WWE or the people that wrestle there, more than it actually being a case of mis-using so much talent and using ''useless'' wrestlers. If you put Khali and any one of TNA's better wrestlers in the same ring, Khali could draw just as much heat as almost anyone in TNA, regardless of the fact that he's a ridiculously bad wrestler. Same goes for Henry. You ALWAYS need a good mix of big/small/average/humungous sized wrestlers, and WWE has that. There's nothing wrong with having a few Khali's and Henry's when you're the WWE, and you'd be hard pressed to find many more than that that really can't wrestle. Khali and Henry fill roles in the WWE. To put someone like Gavin Spears in that role would be stupid. WWE doesn't need someone like Gavin Spears, so they release him. What's the problem?
 
As for Festus, despite the stupid gimmick, the guy can actually wrestle. Horney's just comedy but whatever.
 
And Batista? Outdraws any single person on the TNA roster, without question.
 
So maybe you just hate the WWE and what they do, but they can't just hire all the best technical wrestlers and not fill the rest of their small/big man roles, that's bad business. You're saying it like they don't have good wrestlers on their roster and if they do, they don't get pushes. And no matter what you say, all three champions in WWE are incredible Wrestlers. Orton, Edge, Christian.
 
The same can't be said about TNA's world champion, ironically.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 20 July 2009, 03:15:29 AM
TNA. The only place where you have have 3 fat vs. old matches on the same ppv.

The Dudleyz vs. Booker and Steiner
Joe vs. Sting
Foley vs. Angle

Does no one else see a problem here?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 20 July 2009, 06:48:39 AM
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;31581
TNA. The only place where you have have 3 fat vs. old matches on the same ppv.

The Dudleyz vs. Booker and Steiner
Joe vs. Sting
Foley vs. Angle

Does no one else see a problem here?

Throw in Taz and that TNA buffet table must have been crushed tonight/last night
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 20 July 2009, 02:30:18 PM
Quote from: narcolepsy;31596
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;31581
TNA. The only place where you have have 3 fat vs. old matches on the same ppv.
 
The Dudleyz vs. Booker and Steiner
Joe vs. Sting
Foley vs. Angle
 
Does no one else see a problem here?

Throw in Taz and that TNA buffet table must have been crushed tonight/last night

Don West got to it first and there was a riot.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 21 July 2009, 07:12:34 PM
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;31581
TNA. The only place where you have have 3 fat vs. old matches on the same ppv.

The Dudleyz vs. Booker and Steiner
Joe vs. Sting
Foley vs. Angle

Does no one else see a problem here?

FAIL

3D faced the british invasion
and
Booker and steiner faced Beer Money

with that said this was the worst PPV of the year and maybe the worst PPV i ever seen.

it was just fucking boring all around.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Mini Kong on 21 July 2009, 08:14:46 PM
Quote from: Adampro123;31758


with that said this was the worst PPV of the year and maybe the worst PPV i ever seen.

it was just fucking boring all around.


I only watched the Chris Daniels vs. Matt Morgan match before turning it off, but I heard that the PPV was like an abortion gone wrong.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 21 July 2009, 08:27:19 PM
Quote from: Sycho Shanti;31770
Quote from: Adampro123;31758

with that said this was the worst PPV of the year and maybe the worst PPV i ever seen.

it was just fucking boring all around.

I only watched the Chris Daniels vs. Matt Morgan match before turning it off, but I heard that the PPV was like an abortion gone wrong.

no because that would have at least been hectic and people would be doing stuff to try to fix it.

this was just boring and a lot of guys seemed like they didn't know how to wrestle.

not to mention Earl Hebner fucked up the ending to to the beer money vs booker & Steiner match.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Mini Kong on 21 July 2009, 08:35:29 PM
Quote from: Adampro123;31776


no because that would have at least been hectic and people would be doing stuff to try to fix it.

this was just boring and a lot of guys seemed like they didn't know how to wrestle.

.


Well that's what happen when you give people like Jenna and Sharmell 10 minutes in a ring.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 21 July 2009, 08:51:30 PM
Quote from: Adampro123;31758
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;31581
TNA. The only place where you have have 3 fat vs. old matches on the same ppv.
 
The Dudleyz vs. Booker and Steiner
Joe vs. Sting
Foley vs. Angle
 
Does no one else see a problem here?

FAIL
 
3D faced the british invasion
and
Booker and steiner faced Beer Money
 
with that said this was the worst PPV of the year and maybe the worst PPV i ever seen.
 
it was just fucking boring all around.

Well you get the point. TNA is full of fat/old people :lol
 
And the PPV where they put over all of Main Event Mafia, the PPV sucks. Once again blantantly copying WWE (Evolution).
 
Other than the fact that Evolution didn't suck and was actually used to push young guys.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 21 July 2009, 08:52:16 PM
Quote from: Sycho Shanti;31777
Quote from: Adampro123;31776

no because that would have at least been hectic and people would be doing stuff to try to fix it.

this was just boring and a lot of guys seemed like they didn't know how to wrestle.

.

Well that's what happen when you give people like Jenna and Sharmell 10 minutes in a ring.

i actually enjoyed that....well i enjoyed Jenna getting in the ring and Jenna pinning Sharmell :woot the rest was shit.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Mini Kong on 23 July 2009, 10:05:28 PM
Okay. I read Claudio Castagnoli's blog about the Jenna/Sharmelle match and decided to watch it. It was the biggest steaming pile of shit I've ever seen in wrestling history. Being an aspiring female worker myself, I was seriously disgusted and embarrassed. In all seriousness, it was the worst match I've ever seen in all of my 15 years of watching wrestling.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Fluttershy on 23 July 2009, 10:24:07 PM
(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.411mania.com%2Fsiteimages%2Fslapfighting_24962.gif&hash=b70fb795d41052430cbd48dbaf2f86991d5925a7)
:lol Is worse than the catfights Torrie and Stacy had in the WWE.

And Adampro Jenna's nothing but trash, the way she dressed the way she entered the ring was just Trashy.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 23 July 2009, 10:25:18 PM
God bless TNA for giving her more money than what Gail Kim was asking for to stay with the company :lol:lol:lol
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Mini Kong on 23 July 2009, 10:27:35 PM
Quote from: Mick Clique;32104
God bless TNA for giving her more money than what Gail Kim was asking for to stay with the company :lol:lol:lol


:Kane:
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 25 July 2009, 11:58:11 PM
So I decided I would start following the KO division so I caight the battle royal on YouTube and FUCK that bald headed referee Slick Johnson is it? is quite possibly the worst fucking actor ever. Good god he's awful.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Axel on 26 July 2009, 10:49:32 PM
Since when Refs act? His job is to look ridiculous since Madison Rayne is fucking him.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 26 July 2009, 11:00:21 PM
Quote from: Axel;32268
Since when Refs act? His job is to look ridiculous since Madison Rayne is fucking him.



The fact that you think the second sentence helps your argument in a thread entitled TNA sucks is amazing.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 27 July 2009, 12:14:10 AM
Quote from: Axel;32268
Since when Refs act? His job is to look ridiculous since Madison Rayne is fucking him.

I saw the shower scene so I understand what's going on and his job isn't to look ridiculous because Madison is fucking him, his job is to be biased towards her. I was actually refering to the part in the match when he ejected Cody Deaner is it, the one with ODB?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Mini Kong on 27 July 2009, 01:34:54 AM
Quote from: Axel;32268
Since when Refs act? His job is to look ridiculous since Madison Rayne is fucking him.


When they are involved in a storyline like Slick Rick Johnson is.

This is the card so far for the Hard Justice PPV:

TNA Title:
(Sting's Final Shot)
-Kurt Angle (c) vs. Sting

TNA Tag-Team Titles:

-Booker T & Scott Steiner (c) vs. Team 3D

TNA Legends Title:

-Kevin Nash (c) vs. Mick Foley

The average age is 43.5 years old :ace
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Cannon on 27 July 2009, 01:38:31 AM
Quote from: Mini Kong;32293
Quote from: Axel;32268
Since when Refs act? His job is to look ridiculous since Madison Rayne is fucking him.


When they are involved in a storyline like Slick Rick Johnson is.

This is the card so far for the Hard Justice PPV:

TNA Title:
(Sting's Final Shot)
-Kurt Angle (c) vs. Sting

TNA Tag-Team Titles:

-Booker T & Scott Steiner (c) vs. Team 3D

TNA Legends Title:

-Kevin Nash (c) vs. Mick Foley

The average age is 43.5 years old :ace


I am convinced TNA is nothing but the legends circuit. There like an indy fed in the south with a lot of funding and a TV deal. All they waste there money on are guys who were in there prime 10-15 yrs ago. That is ridiculous... Sure Angle can still got and Booker T to an extenet but everyone else sucks.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 27 July 2009, 01:41:00 AM
*plans another tna rant for tuesday's show*
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Axel on 27 July 2009, 04:02:49 AM
Quote from: Mini Kong;32293
Quote from: Axel;32268
Since when Refs act? His job is to look ridiculous since Madison Rayne is fucking him.

When they are involved in a storyline like Slick Rick Johnson is.

This is the card so far for the Hard Justice PPV:

TNA Title:
(Sting's Final Shot)
-Kurt Angle (c) vs. Sting vs. Matt Morgan.

TNA Tag-Team Titles:

-Booker T & Scott Steiner (c) vs. Team 3D

TNA Legends Title:

-Kevin Nash (c) vs. Mick Foley

The average age is 43.5 years old :ace

Ummm yeah...You forgot one person in that match card.

The only bad wrestlers in the whole card is Nash vs. Foley. Your point is fail, but I do see what your saying. If you don't like what TNA is doing, I dare you and all of these WWE marks to create your own company and tell me if you do such a great job of trying to build a company without household names.

Reality is people pay to see these "43 year olds" no different than Taker, HBK and Triple H.

Besides, your comparing a decent card (minus The Legends match) to WWE...which just put the belt on a man who ripped them for offering him a shit contract.

The intelligence in that is amazing.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 27 July 2009, 04:11:33 AM
Quote from: Axel;32297
Quote from: Mini Kong;32293
Quote from: Axel;32268
Since when Refs act? His job is to look ridiculous since Madison Rayne is fucking him.


When they are involved in a storyline like Slick Rick Johnson is.

This is the card so far for the Hard Justice PPV:

TNA Title:
(Sting's Final Shot)
-Kurt Angle (c) vs. Sting vs. Matt Morgan.

TNA Tag-Team Titles:

-Booker T & Scott Steiner (c) vs. Team 3D

TNA Legends Title:

-Kevin Nash (c) vs. Mick Foley

The average age is 43.5 years old :ace


Ummm yeah...You forgot one person in that match card.

The only bad wrestlers in the whole card is Nash vs. Foley. Your point is fail, but I do see what your saying. If you don't like what TNA is doing, I dare you and all of these WWE marks to create your own company and tell me if you do such a great job of trying to build a company without household names.

Reality is people pay to see these "43 year olds" no different than Taker, HBK and Triple H.

Besides, your comparing a decent card (minus The Legends match) to WWE...which just put the belt on a man who ripped them for offering him a shit contract.

The intelligence in that is amazing.



Your arguments really are laughable.... regardless of the fact that the WWE still has people that are up there in age, what are most of those people doing? HBK and Taker constantly put over younger guys. Triple H just got done working a match on a PPV with 2 guys well under 30. The other main event was 2 relatively fresh faces.

Nevermind the fact that Triple H, HBK, and Taker could wrestle a broomstick and put on a better match than almost anyone in those confirmed matches.

And, of course, nevermind all the other young people on the WWE cards.

There's a big difference here, one that's been WELL documented in this thread. Sure WWE uses older guys, but they actually do push younger guys and fresh faces, and that's a FACT. For as long as I can remember, the main event in TNA now has been guys pushing not their forties, BUT THEIR FUCKING FIFTIES.

How that could make any sense to you or anyone, regardless of what position that fed is in and whatever household names they want or need to use... i can't understand how you can justify a card like this.

it's totally ridiculous.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: chappers on 27 July 2009, 07:24:52 PM
Quote from: Axel;32297
Quote from: Mini Kong;32293
Quote from: Axel;32268
Since when Refs act? His job is to look ridiculous since Madison Rayne is fucking him.

When they are involved in a storyline like Slick Rick Johnson is.

This is the card so far for the Hard Justice PPV:

TNA Title:
(Sting's Final Shot)
-Kurt Angle (c) vs. Sting vs. Matt Morgan.

TNA Tag-Team Titles:

-Booker T & Scott Steiner (c) vs. Team 3D

TNA Legends Title:

-Kevin Nash (c) vs. Mick Foley

The average age is 43.5 years old :ace

Ummm yeah...You forgot one person in that match card.

The only bad wrestlers in the whole card is Nash vs. Foley. Your point is fail, but I do see what your saying. If you don't like what TNA is doing, I dare you and all of these WWE marks to create your own company and tell me if you do such a great job of trying to build a company without household names.

Reality is people pay to see these "43 year olds" no different than Taker, HBK and Triple H.

Besides, your comparing a decent card (minus The Legends match) to WWE...which just put the belt on a man who ripped them for offering him a shit contract.

The intelligence in that is amazing.
Your comparing WWE to a company that has Mick Foley vs cardboard.

Difference is, WWE is a much larger business then TNA, which isn't even as big as ECW. Numbers don't lie, so WWE must be doing something right...
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 28 August 2009, 02:25:54 AM
Quote
"I think that you
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Axel on 28 August 2009, 09:36:47 PM
This thread is stupid really.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 28 August 2009, 09:50:21 PM
To all those who are saying TNA sucks based on the older guys on the roster, do you not bother watching iMPACT or even reading spoilers? Look at this week, talent on the show (in matches):

Suicide, Samoa Joe, Chris Daniels, Elijah Burke, Awesome Kong, Cheerleader Melissa, Traci Brooks, Jessie Neal, Hamada, Daffney, Abyss, The Guns, AJ Styles, Hernandez, Matt Morgan

There is a list of young wrestlers. The only older wrestlers in the ring this week was Sharmell (who didn't get in the ring too much which was good), Rhino, Sting, Scott Steiner and Booker T
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 28 August 2009, 11:16:21 PM
Quote from: utmgorsty;33583
To all those who are saying TNA sucks based on the older guys on the roster, do you not bother watching iMPACT or even reading spoilers? Look at this week, talent on the show (in matches):

Suicide, Samoa Joe, Chris Daniels, Elijah Burke, Awesome Kong, Cheerleader Melissa, Traci Brooks, Jessie Neal, Hamada, Daffney, Abyss, The Guns, AJ Styles, Hernandez, Matt Morgan

There is a list of young wrestlers. The only older wrestlers in the ring this week was Sharmell (who didn't get in the ring too much which was good), Rhino, Sting, Scott Steiner and Booker T



Not that it's the only reason, there are many, but you're being very selective in your reasoning.

While you're right, there is younger talent on the roster and that gets air time, the main event is littered  with older people.

The world champion is 40.
The tag team champions 44 and 47, respectively.
The legends champion is 50!!! FIFTY!!!

Never mind that the last 2 world champions were 50 and 44, for crying out loud!

WWE has a bunch of young guys too, yet people like you seem to focus on the fact that they don't push them. Sound familiar?




Quote from: Axel;33582
This thread is stupid really.


Yet it has over 200 replies and has been open for over a year. Nevermind that TNA actually does suck. But thanks for your input (Y)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Axel on 29 August 2009, 01:51:18 AM
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;33584
Quote from: utmgorsty;33583
To all those who are saying TNA sucks based on the older guys on the roster, do you not bother watching iMPACT or even reading spoilers? Look at this week, talent on the show (in matches):

Suicide, Samoa Joe, Chris Daniels, Elijah Burke, Awesome Kong, Cheerleader Melissa, Traci Brooks, Jessie Neal, Hamada, Daffney, Abyss, The Guns, AJ Styles, Hernandez, Matt Morgan

There is a list of young wrestlers. The only older wrestlers in the ring this week was Sharmell (who didn't get in the ring too much which was good), Rhino, Sting, Scott Steiner and Booker T


Not that it's the only reason, there are many, but you're being very selective in your reasoning.

While you're right, there is younger talent on the roster and that gets air time, the main event is littered  with older people.

The world champion is 40.
The tag team champions 44 and 47, respectively.
The legends champion is 50!!! FIFTY!!!

Never mind that the last 2 world champions were 50 and 44, for crying out loud!

WWE has a bunch of young guys too, yet people like you seem to focus on the fact that they don't push them. Sound familiar?


This is why I can't stand so called wrestling fans like you.

Because if had any intelligence then you would know they they are still capable of drawing, Booker T & Scott Steiner are what people want to see, Kurt Angle are what people want to see, Kevin Nash people paid to see.

Who gives a rats ass how old they are because they can still wrestle and put on good shows. If you have been so damn blind to your own ignorance then you would see that Scotty and Booker have been putting over new guys like Beer Money.

Kurt Angle is currently putting over Matt Morgan as a main eventer.

Sting is putting over AJ Styles right now, which will lead to a retirement match at Bound For Glory.

Hernandez will be getting a World title push very soon, Team 3D has been putting over The British Invasion and World Elite from time to time.

Elijah Burke or "The Pope" is expected to become a main eventer in the future. Which is why he's so active even though even though  he just debuted last week.

Please get your narrow minded head out of your ass and look at things from a intelligent stand point instead of bashing shit you obviously don't understand. And It's fine if you don't but don't ruin other people's taste in wrestling by creating stupid and immature threads like this because it only shows how much growing up you need to do if you can't respect another company's style or how they do things.

When I first watched TNA for 3 minutes I hated it and I felt they were trying to be like WWE, then I watched the whole show and I ended up loving it and being open to their unique style which has turned into a legit wrestling company.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 29 August 2009, 02:17:42 AM
Quote from: Axel;33596

This is why I can't stand so called wrestling fans like you.


You're the one who bitches and moans about the main wrestling company and I'm the "so-called" wrestling fan? I've been a wrestling fan for most of my life. I've seen a lot of highs, and a lot of lows in this industry, and sure, this may be a low, but that doesn't mean i have to be cynical and negative like you.

I'm more of a wrestling fan than you'll ever be.



Quote
Because if had any intelligence


If you did you'd learn how to form a proper sentence.

Quote
then you would know they they are still capable of drawing, Booker T & Scott Steiner are what people want to see, Kurt Angle are what people want to see, Kevin Nash people paid to see.


So, People want to pay to see 40 to 50 year olds wrestle at a fraction of the ability they used to have, but they don't want to see 30 year old John Cena and Orton and Punk and Hardy wrestle? Your logic is backwards and full of double standards. "So-Called" wrestling fans like you bitch and moan about how WWE doesn't make new stars, and then you defend the shit that TNA puts on TV and say "oh well they still have AJ and Joe" (who, interestlingly enough, are as old as a lot of main eventers) "and they're pushing Homicide and Hernandez and Morgan" (who are all in like they're mid 30s



Quote
Who gives a rats ass how old they are because they can still wrestle


Nash can't wrestle anymore.
Steiner can't wrestle anymore.
Mick Foley was never able to wrestler.

Angle will always be able to wrestle (until he kills himself doing it that is), so I'll give you that one.

Quote
and put on good shows.


As arguable as any post you've ever made here.

Quote
If you have been so damn blind to your own ignorance then you would see that Scotty and Booker have been putting over new guys like Beer Money.


Ah, so they can go over other people and still put them over, but DX goes over people doesn't? Double standard.

Also, how are Beer Money new people? They're both 32 and have been with TNA since the beginning! That's simply a lie!

Quote
Kurt Angle is currently putting over Matt Morgan as a main eventer.


Yet he's still going to beat him every time they fight.

I do give them credit for finally pushing some new blood in Morgan though.


Quote
Sting is putting over AJ Styles right now, which will lead to a retirement match at Bound For Glory.


Can't blame them for employing Sting either, he's still popular, but Styles isn't a new guy either.


Quote
Hernandez will be getting a World title push very soon, Team 3D has been putting over The British Invasion and World Elite from time to time.


Hernandez is in his late 30s.


Quote
Elijah Burke or "The Pope" is expected to become a main eventer in the future. Which is why he's so active even though even though  he just debuted last week.


:lol


Quote
Please get your narrow minded head out of your ass


Let's both do it at the count of 3!

Quote
and look at things from a intelligent stand point instead of bashing shit you obviously don't understand.


Hey pot, have you met my friend, Mr. Kettle?

Quote
And It's fine if you don't


Really, it isn't? Then why did you post this long ass incoherent rant about it if it's fine?

Quote
but don't ruin other people's taste in wrestling by creating stupid and immature threads like this


Right, cause a thread i started on a semi-active forum over a year ago ruins people's taste in wrestling? Dear lord, how will i sleep tonight, knowing that i'm slowly withering away at your will to follow professional wrestling.

*GASP*, maybe in a little while, it will become so unbearable for you that you will stop watching wrestling entirely, and you will leave mayhem forever :O

Quote
because it only shows how much growing up you need to do


Trying to think of something witty to say here, but honestly, I think this comment speaks for itself.

Quote
if you can't respect another company's style or how they do things.


Jesus Christ.... I'm about 75% sure right now that you're just doing this to be a troll. :lol

Either that or you thought you were quoting one of your own posts from the WWE section.

Quote
When I first watched TNA for 3 minutes I hated it and I felt they were trying to be like WWE,


Really? What gave that away? Was it the fact that their entire main event scene used to be employed by the wwe? The fact that they're using their former writers? Or the shit they try to force down our throats?


Quote
then I watched the whole show and I ended up loving it and being open to their unique style which has turned into a legit wrestling company.


Great way to finish off arguably the funniest post I've ever seen out of you.

Honestly I'm a little disappointed, after a pretty good rant you end up pretty damn weak. You need to work on that.

Honestly I don't even know how to react... but keep at it, you add a "unique" form of entertainment to a site that's been pretty dull lately.

Honestly, what the fuck man, I'm pissing myself laughing right now :lol
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Axel on 29 August 2009, 04:36:17 AM
You really aren't a wrestling fan if you don't know the meaning of "pushing talent", you don't have to be 20 years old and new to be a newly pushed talent. Jeff Hardy was an example of that.

Difference between Booker and Scotty and Cena is they actually can wrestle. That shitfest called John Cena just does his famous 5 Moves Of Doom while he's dominated by his opponent during the entire match.  Age doesn't matter when you have guys that still can put their effort and skill in the ring and want to breath new life into the company.

WWE or not, I promise you they would be still in WWE or WCW trying to put over new talent and trying to get new guys signed. You may hate them but they have more love for the business than you and anyone ever will.

 How the fuck would you like it if your dream was to be a wrestler and you spend your whole damn career doing it and a bunch of losers over the computer are tell you shit about your age when your trying to make newer stars in the ring?

Now I never said, DX doesn't push anyone, however that Legacy match was hardly the right team to push in the first place.


I'll just say this slowly if your retarded mind can't process this. Your. A. Waste. Of. My Time. You sound like a complete noob and idiot since you can't post anything intelligent and not act like a 10 year old.

You can make fun of me all you want but anyone can see, I've been the honest one and not made any lame shitty joke and making a complete ass out of my self unlike you.

And I really don't care how long you created this thread or topic because it just shows all of you are immature losers who don't respect anything that isn't WWE's standards.

If you did respect it then you would know that it takes more than Indy wrestlers to make a newer company shine. You don't know shit about creating a company or what tools you need to do it.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 29 August 2009, 04:38:49 AM
I'm indifferent to this thread, but Prax, that reminded me of some classic Big Ace posts.  Not sure if thats a compliment or an insult but I was thoroughly entertained.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 29 August 2009, 09:16:21 PM
Prax, you are the polar opposite to Axel in every way in that Axel will defend TNA regardless of what they do, and you will blindly lick Vince McMahon's asshole and tell him it tastes like chocolate.

WWE sucks too, yet I doubt a narrow minded prick like yourself would ever admit that fact. As Axel did say, in wrestling, its not how young you are when you get your first push.

Edge got his first push about the age of 33, Jeff Hardy got his first title at 29, Christian got his first title in WWE at the age of 35. Just because they're not in their 20's doesn't mean they're not fresh blood in the main event, as you pointed out, much of the top tier of WRESTLING (not just TNA) are over 40 or atl least nearing 40.

Also to call you out on a retarded comment you made about Steiner and Booker being champs and comparing them to DX, there is one major difference, in the end, Beer Money will go over them and take the titles back elevating them because they'd just beaten 2 of the biggest names in tag team wrestling, what exactly would DX going over Legacy numerous times do for their credibility?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 29 August 2009, 09:40:28 PM
Quote from: utmgorsty;33614
Prax, you are the polar opposite to Axel in every way in that Axel will defend TNA regardless of what they do, and you will blindly lick Vince McMahon's asshole and tell him it tastes like chocolate.

WWE sucks too, yet I doubt a narrow minded prick like yourself would ever admit that fact. As Axel did say, in wrestling, its not how young you are when you get your first push.

Edge got his first push about the age of 33, Jeff Hardy got his first title at 29, Christian got his first title in WWE at the age of 35. Just because they're not in their 20's doesn't mean they're not fresh blood in the main event, as you pointed out, much of the top tier of WRESTLING (not just TNA) are over 40 or atl least nearing 40.

Also to call you out on a retarded comment you made about Steiner and Booker being champs and comparing them to DX, there is one major difference, in the end, Beer Money will go over them and take the titles back elevating them because they'd just beaten 2 of the biggest names in tag team wrestling, what exactly would DX going over Legacy numerous times do for their credibility?

I don't blindly follow anything. Just because I actually enjoy WWE on occasion doesn't mean I "dicklick" Vince or anyone. I've posted my fair share of negative things about WWE and frankly, up to a little while ago, I barely had barely watched the WWE for like a year.

 As for your actual wrestling comments:

- I was being sarcastic about the age thing. People like you and Axel post shit about WWE not posting new young guys despite the fact that they actually do, yet everyone who gets pushed in TNA is older and gets held don't regardless, and that's ok.

- DX might go over legacy, but they're giving them the experience of main eventing against two of the most decorated and experienced wrestlers in the history of the industry. Whether Legacy ends up going over them or not (and they already have gone over Triple H), it's experience and it will help them in the future depending on what WWE wants to do with them, and by every indication, at least Ted Jr. has big things ahead of him.  Scotty and Booker? They haven't done any favors for Beer Money yet other than taking their titles and as for giving them back to them? It's kind of a wash, and it isn't going to make them main eventers.


But hey,

WWE sucks.

TNA rules.

And I'm sorry I ever said anything that would imply otherwise on WWEMAYHEM.com
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Axel on 29 August 2009, 10:01:37 PM
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;33617
No one forces you to continue to watch the WWE even though it sucks and you can't find a single positive in it.

You really must be a blind fool. I have many and many positive things in WWE that keeps watching it, If you can't handle that I am not in love with every single fucking thing they do is your problem.

Everyone and there mama knows I am the biggest Punk fan and I am happy he's getting a main event spot and a feud with Taker will keep him in the main event spot for good.

I don't agree with WWE and Vince's logic on many things which is what I normally rant about.

If WWE pushes new people than why is Swagger not holding a title?, Why did Mark Henry bring in big ratings and pin Orton but can't get a WWE title shot?  Why is Randy Orton been the only heel wrestler on RAW to hold the WWE title in YEARS.

TNA right now is pushing Matt Morgan to be a main event heel talent, Hernandez is being pushed as a bigger face type wrestler. It's simple, no need for TNA vs. WWE.

I would feel the same way if the tables were turned. Fact it, WWE is NOT pushing new guys. SmackDown isn't the only fucking show in WWE, therefore it doesn't count unless both brands are doing it.

I'm speaking the TRUTH, It doesn't mean I don't find anything positive in WWE.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 2 September 2009, 03:38:28 AM
Actual random TNA discussion:

Don't know if he had another match prior to this one, but Kevin Thorne wrestled at the TNA impact tapings this week in what seemed to be a dark match under the name "Serpent". He lost to Kip James.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 24 September 2009, 03:47:23 PM
Looks like BFG is going to be Angle/Morgan and Styles/Sting. In terms of the matches themselves, those don't strike me as the best they can do... weren't they supposed to do Angle/Lashley, or was that meant for later? Either way, in terms of build up and main event drawing power, those main events aren't that bad. lol @ Angle choosing the biggest PPV of the year to take himself out of the title scene though.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 24 September 2009, 08:18:45 PM
But at least he did it, seeing Sting, Angle and hopefully Booker/Steiner going against younger guys (and hopefully all losing) will give the rub to Beer Money, AJ and Morgan (assuming that Beer Money are challenging for the TNA tag team titles).
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 24 September 2009, 08:26:59 PM
Quote from: utmgorsty;34849
But at least he did it, seeing Sting, Angle and hopefully Booker/Steiner going against younger guys (and hopefully all losing) will give the rub to Beer Money, AJ and Morgan (assuming that Beer Money are challenging for the TNA tag team titles).

If they use this to kill the MEM angle, then I might give TNA a chance.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Axel on 24 September 2009, 10:29:08 PM
I'm trying hard not to read the spoilers and just enjoy the unexpected but from what I read, Main Event Mafia vs. World Elite at Bound For Glory and Lashley/Joe. It looks like Amazing Red will be getting the X-Division belt also.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 19 October 2009, 02:39:50 PM
Axel, answer this for me please:
 
 
You seem to be pretty against WWE using celebrities in their product... how do you feel about TNA mimicking them last night at Bound for Glory (at least in the pre-show) when they used former N-Sync member and Z-list actor Joey Fatone?
 
 
Anywya, skimmed through the results of BFG and it didn't look half bad. Very glad they put the Legends title on EY, we'll see how long that lasts..
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 19 October 2009, 07:37:45 PM
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;35474
Axel, answer this for me please:
 
 
You seem to be pretty against WWE using celebrities in their product... how do you feel about TNA mimicking them last night at Bound for Glory (at least in the pre-show) when they used former N-Sync member and Z-list actor Joey Fatone?
 
 
Anywya, skimmed through the results of BFG and it didn't look half bad. Very glad they put the Legends title on EY, we'll see how long that lasts..
Just my opinion on it, but he was hosting a free PPV preview show, not hosting the flagship show of the company, thats my thought on that, so saying they're mimicking WWE is a bit of an overestimation of the amount of people watching the pre-show.

As for the show, I'm upto the Full Metal Mayhem so far, and its been a very good show so far. Can't believe Booker probably refused to job in a fuckin ladder match where he doesn't even need to get beat, I hope TNA just fire his ass now because he isn't adding anything other than problems.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 20 October 2009, 12:55:40 AM
I love Joeys last name FAT ONE
xD

but once again i don't care if celebs are involved as long as they don't suck at what they are doing or take up the whole show and fatone didn't do either so no problem from me.

i thought bound for glory was a good show but the only thing was some of the matches ended too soon and wasn't given enough time. but thats whats gonna happen when you have 9 matches on the card.

Looks like we finally got rid of steiner and booker YAY!

lashley got booed like crazy. YAY!

AJ Beat Sting in what was a really good match just with and ending that was anticlimactic.

Mafia now has no gold left. seems we may be seeing the begining of the end of the main event mafia and lets hope to god that is the case.

Daniels took one of the sickest bumps ever last night. i hear he's ok though minus a few minor injuries.

K.O tag titles should have never been invented there just isn't room for them right now.

Angle vs Morgan was a great match IMO.

Lashley vs Joe was really good with a lame ending.

the tag title match was really good but i think it went a tad too long

Abyss vs Foley was really good minus the fuck up by the ref counting 3 as clear as day when abyss was down. but to abyss's credit he got the crowed to forget about it fast. also some credit should go to daphney for taking that sick bump through the barbwire. i love her!

I was happy with the legends title match. i had a feeling EY would sneak in there and get the win. the match was better than i thought and was the right length IMO.

Ultimate X was awesome. was sad pope didn't make it but i hope the best for his family emergency whatever it may be. also glad the machineguns got  in the match they always steal the show when they are in the ring.

machineguns vs Creed and Lethal was also really good. very fast ast like i like it and a lot of tag team moves. creed and lethal have improved so much as a tag team.

K.O. triple threat wasn't too good either. i didn't really like the whole Tara vs Randy Cultors wife. or whoever it was littke work shoot. i didn't think it was done well and i think it shouldn't have happened at BFG when i think the championship is supposed to be most important not a "personal beef"

all and all it was the best bound for glory but i didn't expect it to be. it was still a good show though. TNA just gotta get a better guy to run what we see on TV because they never cut to the right camera at the right time.

MCMG vs LC = Really good.
Ultimate X = Great.
K.O. Tag title = Lame but short.
Legends title = good.
Tag Title match = really good but went a bit too long.
K.O title match = kinda lame.
Lashley vs Joe = Really good minus ending.
Foley vs Abyss = Really good minus 1 fuck up.
Angle vs Morgan = great.
AJ vs Sting = great minus lackluster ending.

Overall i was happy with BFG. not extremely happy but if i did order PPVs and i did order this one i would be satisfied.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 22 October 2009, 04:35:31 PM
Quote
The Wrestling Observer is reporting that this past Sunday night's TNA Bound For Glory PPV drew a final 2,400 people to the Bren Events Center in Irvine, CA. It should be noted, however, that TNA heavily papered the event to make it seem as if it drew well, and the reality is that as of one week before the event only 850 tickets had been sold for the show. Word backstage is that several TNA officials tried to prevent the company from running the show in LA, fearing that it would not sell well.

That's pretty piss poor. No wonder they usually they stick to the iMPACT zone.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Axel on 23 October 2009, 12:10:58 AM
Not surprised. UFC is also struggling to sell tickets within the same area since TNA and UFC were papering at the sametime in Cali.

Even if they didn't get the best attendance, those were the loudest and awesome 2,400 fans TNA ever had.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 23 October 2009, 01:24:14 AM
Quote from: Axel;35556
Even if they didn't get the best attendance, those were the loudest and awesome 2,400 fans TNA ever had.

How can you call call 1550 fans who didn't even buy a ticket to their biggest show of the year awesome lol?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 23 October 2009, 04:59:26 AM
Quote from: Axel;35556
Not surprised. UFC is also struggling to sell tickets within the same area since TNA and UFC were papering at the sametime in Cali.

Even if they didn't get the best attendance, those were the loudest and awesome 2,400 fans TNA ever had.


There's 2 differences between UFC ticket sales and TNA ticket sales:

1- UFC tickets are super expensive. I doubt TNA's EVER had a seat in any arena they've ever run a show in as expensive as the LEAST expensive UFC ticket.

2- UFC runs shows in arenas that hold 20,000 and paper 10 to 20 percent of it, meaning they still sell out at least 75% of their arenas.

And it's a free show, of course they're going to cheer :P
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 23 October 2009, 06:16:20 AM
theres no way around it weather you like it or not TNA doesn't market themselves well enough so they get awful ticket sales.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 4 November 2009, 01:55:29 AM
A Spoiler for one of the upcoming iMPACT shows so don't read if you don't wanna be spoiled etc

Quote
- Likewise, Jim Neidhart is also in for a short stint and will wrestle "Black Machismo" Jay Lethal, who is currently working against wrestlers from the 1980's.

Quote
-- Former WWE tag champion Jim "The Anvil" Neidhart is also currently backstage tonight's taping. Neidhart was the longtime partner of WWE Hall of Famer Bret "Hitman" Hart and is expected to be used on-camera tonight. For those wondering if this is a result of Hulk Hogan & Eric Bischoff's affiliation and a sign that more early 1990's wrestlers are headed to TNA (ie. Brutus Beefcake & the Nasty Boys), we're told that Neidhart was booked for tonight's show before Hogan and Bischoff signed with the company.

Quote
* Jim Neidhart defeated Jay Lethal with a running power slam.

I saw the plans and thought he was gonna steal another gimmick and become a Legend Killer of sorts. Apparently not...
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 4 November 2009, 02:55:32 AM
No, but we still get to make fun of them for using old washed up stars and putting them over young talent :)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Axel on 4 November 2009, 05:15:37 AM
Your such a retard you know that?

How about read in between the lines of this new Jay Lethal angle. It's pretty obvious he'll job out to some legends and then turn around and either get put over by the same legends or want to end their careers aka. Legend Killer-ish gimmick.

I probably should laugh at you everytime WWE used any "washed up" wrestlers ever like Steamboat or the random Marty appearance.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 4 November 2009, 05:24:30 AM
Rofl.

Really, REALLY? Your going to compare Ricky fucking Steamboat feuding with Jericho to Jim Neidhart beating some Macho Man wannabe, REALLY? Also, in regards to the Janetty situation, had you not seen the build to the Morrison and Miz feud? It made perfect sense for them to have Janetty go out and be humiliated.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 4 November 2009, 04:25:01 PM
Quote from: Axel;35790
Your such a retard you know that?
 
How about read in between the lines of this new Jay Lethal angle. It's pretty obvious he'll job out to some legends and then turn around and either get put over by the same legends or want to end their careers aka. Legend Killer-ish gimmick.
 
I probably should laugh at you everytime WWE used any "washed up" wrestlers ever like Steamboat or the random Marty appearance.

First of all, call me a retard again and you're banned for minimum a week :)
 
And Steamboat could actually wrestle when they brought him in against Jericho. And as you said, they're random appearances and those are probably the only two names you could come up with, whereas I could name a large number of main eventers in TNA who could compare to Steamboat in terms of age and ability.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 5 November 2009, 01:44:33 AM
Quote
The Wrestling Observer is reporting that TNA recently made former WWE star John Bradshaw Layfield an offer to work for the company however he turned it down saying that he has no interest in working for TNA.

:giggle
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 5 November 2009, 01:48:54 AM
Can't say i'm all that surprised tbh as I swear he retired because his back was fucked up again. Not like he's desperate for money either.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Axel on 5 November 2009, 05:02:47 AM
This is not the first offer they made to him. He says, he wants to stay retired. He clearly stated that the wanted to not control his weight and be freely.

Anywho...Shannon Moore is going to TNA. According to Dixie Carter. She recently has been asking fans to give requests on who they want to see more of or signed (via. Twitter), Moore was one of the people. I personally asked her for a Pope face turn and he's getting one.

Quote from: Hollywood Prax;35793
Quote from: Axel;35790
Your such a retard you know that?
 
How about read in between the lines of this new Jay Lethal angle. It's pretty obvious he'll job out to some legends and then turn around and either get put over by the same legends or want to end their careers aka. Legend Killer-ish gimmick.
 
I probably should laugh at you everytime WWE used any "washed up" wrestlers ever like Steamboat or the random Marty appearance.

First of all, call me a retard again and you're banned for minimum a week :)
 
And Steamboat could actually wrestle when they brought him in against Jericho. And as you said, they're random appearances and those are probably the only two names you could come up with, whereas I could name a large number of main eventers in TNA who could compare to Steamboat in terms of age and ability.

Next time you choose to insult me, you should follow your own advice. Hence the reason why I said it in the first place.

Yeah, your logic is way off. It's pretty damn obvious Lethal will job to some Legends before getting a heel turn and wanting to destroy them or eventually being put over by the same exact Legends in a pass of the torch if you will.

My guess is he'll turn into a Legend Killer.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 5 November 2009, 09:24:46 AM
Prax hates TNA and loves WWE
Axel hates WWE and loves TNA

why can't we all just accept it and move on? lol.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 5 November 2009, 02:08:56 PM
Quote from: Axel;35808
This is not the first offer they made to him. He says, he wants to stay retired. He clearly stated that the wanted to not control his weight and be freely.
 
Anywho...Shannon Moore is going to TNA. According to Dixie Carter. She recently has been asking fans to give requests on who they want to see more of or signed (via. Twitter), Moore was one of the people. I personally asked her for a Pope face turn and he's getting one.
 
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;35793
Quote from: Axel;35790
Your such a retard you know that?
 
How about read in between the lines of this new Jay Lethal angle. It's pretty obvious he'll job out to some legends and then turn around and either get put over by the same legends or want to end their careers aka. Legend Killer-ish gimmick.
 
I probably should laugh at you everytime WWE used any "washed up" wrestlers ever like Steamboat or the random Marty appearance.

First of all, call me a retard again and you're banned for minimum a week :)
 
And Steamboat could actually wrestle when they brought him in against Jericho. And as you said, they're random appearances and those are probably the only two names you could come up with, whereas I could name a large number of main eventers in TNA who could compare to Steamboat in terms of age and ability.

Next time you choose to insult me, you should follow your own advice. Hence the reason why I said it in the first place.
 
Yeah, your logic is way off. It's pretty damn obvious Lethal will job to some Legends before getting a heel turn and wanting to destroy them or eventually being put over by the same exact Legends in a pass of the torch if you will.
 
My guess is he'll turn into a Legend Killer.

Ah, so they're going to copy another WWE storyline with a wrestler that already copies a former WWE guy? :giggle
 
And how is my logic off? You're not even addressing what I said, that the ''Legends'' WWE brings in are, first of all, of overall better quality than the ones TNA brings in, and secondly, don't negatively affect their own talent for the most part. Although we'll see how they did it tonight, if Anvil beat him clean then that doesn't help Lethal IMO.

And finally, I didn't even insult you in the entire friggin last page of this thread, so get over your delusions and be respectful.
 

Adam, I'll move on when TNA becomes good and stops leeching off the fame generated by others.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 6 November 2009, 01:41:02 AM
Well if the past has tought us anything about wrestling then it looks like you won't be moving on for a long long time.

but i just meant why do you guys always gotta fight with axel? just let him have his opinions and you have yours. these little internet forum wars seems so unneeded and i just wish the insults and smart assness could stop and we could just all discuss stuff in a more mature way.

but then again thats a wrestling forum for ya.lol.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 11 November 2009, 10:50:39 PM
And with Randy Orton I'm pretty sure he wasn't the first person to use the "Legend Killer" gimmick. Face it, your argument is pointless, and should that be the way TNA wants to play it (for all we know, it may go a completely different direction) it would be completely different from the way WWE went about making Orton the "Legend Killer".

As for the pointless bickering, will you both shut the fuck up sniping at each other, it makes threads boring with constant bickering between you two. And Prax, quit throwing authority around because it makes you look like a prick, you can call him a retard and thats fine because he doesn't agree with you, but if he says the same, the throw around the "I'll ban you for a week" bullshit, and don't even think of trying it on me since I'm pretty sure the guy who owns the place would overturn it.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 11 November 2009, 11:15:01 PM
Quote from: utmgorsty;35933
And with Randy Orton I'm pretty sure he wasn't the first person to use the "Legend Killer" gimmick. Face it, your argument is pointless, and should that be the way TNA wants to play it (for all we know, it may go a completely different direction) it would be completely different from the way WWE went about making Orton the "Legend Killer".

As for the pointless bickering, will you both shut the fuck up sniping at each other, it makes threads boring with constant bickering between you two. And Prax, quit throwing authority around because it makes you look like a prick, you can call him a retard and thats fine because he doesn't agree with you, but if he says the same, the throw around the "I'll ban you for a week" bullshit, and don't even think of trying it on me since I'm pretty sure the guy who owns the place would overturn it.


Ya, cause the guy who owns this place really pays attention to what's going on around here 8-)

He insulted me in this thread and I hadn't flamed him in a long time. But I guess it's ok for him to flame me since I called him a retard like a month ago...

And ya, the direction TNA could be different from WWE's, but I doubt it.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 11 November 2009, 11:41:46 PM
Being Orton's whole legend killer deal didn't start out the same way Lethal's is, I'm pretty sure it will be different. As a whole, Orton's was just to make a name for himself at the expense of legends, Lethal is issuing an open challenge and hopefully will see him get a number of losses before snapping and going crazy which would be different to the way Orton's worked.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 19 November 2009, 03:39:14 AM
Quote
Psycho Sid Promotions sent out the following e-mail earlier today, saying he's headed to TNA:

The Return of the Master and Ruler of the World "Psycho" Sid Vicious is coming to TNA Wrestling!

Spike TV Thursday Nights!

We warned WWE that this would Happen.

Never say Never!
Stay Tuned

-Psycho Sid Promotions


Furthermore, Sid's official MySpace page now has a huge TNA logo on it with the words "Never Say Never."

The part I should find funniest is the bit about him actually heading to TNA but it isn't, it's the part about him warning the WWE this would happen as if he is a Rock or Austin type star who they've let slip.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 19 November 2009, 02:38:07 PM
Well from most reports Sid is actually back into some pretty decent ring shape, but WWE passed on him for many reasons, probably.
 
I could get into the whole old washed up WWE/WCW argument, but whatever...
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 19 November 2009, 11:15:01 PM
As is pointed out, he did this with WWE before, he is a joke, at least when Jericho did it (first time) he was still relevant in the business.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 20 November 2009, 08:02:27 AM
Bringing sid in is a joke. still not as bad as bringing in the old lard ass uglyest losers in the world. The Nasty boys. but still TNA doesn't need Sid and i really don't care to see him in TNA.....hell i want nash out as it is and he is really good on the mic and in the roles he plays.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 18 January 2010, 05:55:21 PM
Generation Me (The Young Bucks) vs the Motor City Machineguns from iMPACT was awesome. Looking forward to seeing either a feud between both teams, or some other interesting matches against teams like Lethal Consequences, Beer Money or the British Invasion.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 19 January 2010, 03:17:16 AM
ahem.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 19 January 2010, 07:23:37 AM
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;37430
ahem.
Very good contribution to a thread, I take it you don't plan on giving any details on what the fuck that is supposed to mean? Whatever, as a WWE mark who honestly wouldn't give TNA credit if they put on a full card of 5* matches, your opinion in the TNA forum is pretty invalid
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 19 January 2010, 08:08:30 AM
WOAH WOAH WOAH HOLD THE PHONE. Tell me you don't think TNA is doing good right now. TELL ME IT.

Anyone who watched that PPV could tell TNA is seriously in trouble. First off, i do love the NOAH ramp that TNA is using but your fans turning on you like that on live PPV isn't good. Second, did  Val Venis really beat Daniels? Daniels a TNA mainstay who has taken some bullshit was on the second match of the card, looking like a cowardly heel jobbing to Val fucking Venis!? REALLY TNA?! I like Val, but Daniels is above that especially since hes been in TNA and Venis hasn't done shit in years. I mean when was the last time before this TNA run he was on TV? Other than that the PPV was really forgettable. Angle vs AJ Styles was fantastic ruined by a shitty finish. Sure it established AJ as a heel but couldn't this have been done post match as Angle handed over the title to Styles? It would have put his talent over instead of him being a heel.

All of Hogans friends need to leave, they need to stop signing people (I love Brian Kendrick as much as the next guy but what does he bring to the table to make him stand out.) and push the young, established TNA talent. That legit looked like WCW 2000 last night instead of TNA and its fucking creepy.

Oh and you can put on a card full of 5* matches but does it make sense? If it doesn't people cans till hate on it.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 19 January 2010, 01:56:52 PM
Quote from: Gorsty;37431
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;37430
ahem.
Very good contribution to a thread, I take it you don't plan on giving any details on what the fuck that is supposed to mean? Whatever, as a WWE mark who honestly wouldn't give TNA credit if they put on a full card of 5* matches, your opinion in the TNA forum is pretty invalid

First of all, I'm not a WWE mark. If you want me to be fair, I'll be fair, I only watched the second half of last night's show and nothing was really memorable. Apparently the opening seg was good with Taker/Vince/HBK so I'll have to check that out, but otherwise, I didn't enjoy what I saw of RAW (although Heder and Don Johnson seemed to do a good job).
 
Secondly, I didn't watch the TNA pay-per-view, so I'm not even commenting on that (although, the fact that Val Venis went over Chris Daniels might be the worst decision in the history of pro wrestling).
 
I'm commenting on the TNA taping results from last night, and if you SERIOUSLY read what happens in that main event and you think that it's ok, then you're no longer worth my time.
 
 
 
Quote from: THE Leonardo LunchBoX;37433
WOAH WOAH WOAH HOLD THE PHONE. Tell me you don't think TNA is doing good right now. TELL ME IT.
 
Anyone who watched that PPV could tell TNA is seriously in trouble. First off, i do love the NOAH ramp that TNA is using but your fans turning on you like that on live PPV isn't good. Second, did Val Venis really beat Daniels? Daniels a TNA mainstay who has taken some bullshit was on the second match of the card, looking like a cowardly heel jobbing to Val fucking Venis!? REALLY TNA?! I like Val, but Daniels is above that especially since hes been in TNA and Venis hasn't done shit in years. I mean when was the last time before this TNA run he was on TV? Other than that the PPV was really forgettable. Angle vs AJ Styles was fantastic ruined by a shitty finish. Sure it established AJ as a heel but couldn't this have been done post match as Angle handed over the title to Styles? It would have put his talent over instead of him being a heel.
 
All of Hogans friends need to leave, they need to stop signing people (I love Brian Kendrick as much as the next guy but what does he bring to the table to make him stand out.) and push the young, established TNA talent. That legit looked like WCW 2000 last night instead of TNA and its fucking creepy.
 
Oh and you can put on a card full of 5* matches but does it make sense? If it doesn't people cans till hate on it.

this too.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 19 January 2010, 04:56:13 PM
Really enjoyed the PPV besides Moreley going over Daniels it was really solid.

Beer Money vs Nash and Waltman was really good. Waltman blew me away and i can't stand the guy personally because he seems like a loser drunk he just wants attention. but he did great in the ring and i really like the team of him and nash.

Kendrick debut match wasn't so good. him and Red just didn't click and i dunno if it was because red wasn't used to the 4 sided ring or if kendrick was rusty or high but those 2 just didn't click. but its great to have kendrick in TNA i think he could possibly make the x division better than it is now just because there are really only 3 guys in it that are any good who aren't in a tag team. (Suicide, Homicide, & Red)

Mr. Andersons Debut was Epic.though the match wasn't it was still pretty good. i have said it before i don't think he's that great in the ring but his charisma and mic skills are great. with the lighter schedule and within time i think he could do very well for and with TNA.

Morgan and Hernandez vs Brits was pretty good. im just glad they got the tag straps off the brits because i was getting sick of them having them.

Wolfe vs Pope was Great! i loved the story in this match and these 2 guys can just flat out go. 2 of my favorites in wrestling today and they did not disappoint me. i hope this feud keeps going.

Aj vs Angle was a great match though not as good as there previous two that we have seen in the last 6 months. though the heel turn was pretty rad IMO. this will give AJ more credibility with Flair by his side to those who are new to TNA and  may not know who he is. also it will be pretty cool to see flair as a heel again.

I Actually applaud the fans for Chanting what they felt about and not being censored though it looks like that will stop (you will see what i mean in the vid i post soon) but i like  them bringing in the 4 sides just because thats what a lot of people said they didn't like about TNA.

Glad that Angelena love is back. :]

Now its not all positives.

The Nasty Boys.
Come on!!! no one gives a shit about them and no one ever really has as far as i remember. they are fat talentless friends of hulk hogan and thats why they have a job. i just hope to god they never get in the ring. but it dishust me to seethem have TV Time and others who deserve it don't.

What about Eric Young?  
Things seemed to be going so well for him and world elite around bound for glory but lately he has kind of vanished. nash was with him before but now thats hogans in charge its like EY means nothing and WE means nothing.

On your follow up show at least try to follow up on one of the most over guys in wrestling (jeff hardy) instead of basically not mentioning him all night.

the New Ramp reminds me of the Old Way early WCW ramps that i always loved. i just think they need to clear more space around the ring for dives and stuff like that.

What about Joe?
Joe was in one of the best matches of the year in the World title main event just 2 months ago. then he was thrown in feast or fired though he won the world title shot he hasn't really been doing much lately and wasn't even on genesis.

Sabin & Shelley should always have a Match on PPV.

TNA has made Creed and Lethal a Joke.

I would say make it clear who your faces and heels are and make it make sense. i don't see how anyone could think JJ is the heel when he was the one who rand the company and someone the fans love for years. and how can hogan be the face when you got bichoffbeing a heel with them on the same side? and whats foley supposed to be?

Whats up with Lashley?
Is he gonna ever wrestle? and who really cares about him? i know he just turned heel but the way bichoff treats kristal (who is a very good mouth peace for him) makes it seem like lashley is a joke and the whole deal with him is he doesn't want to be in TNA....THATS NOT SMART

Oh and what pisses me off the most is that they took Jeremy Borash off the air until further notice...JB is the BEST backstage iterviewer since Mean Gean and has been in TNA since day 1. if this is the rise of TNA he should be a part of it.

as it stands right now though it looks like TNA is on the Rise to me. it looks like they will soon be going live on mondays full time which should be cool. looks like they will be adding a new show and there ratings are up and hogan and bichoff will get them more publicity then they have ever had. and they are grabbing star power left and right and though it is a bit too much and i think they should resort the roster a bit overall they have a awesome roster with both great young talent that gets featured and some well known names so they can bring in so many different kind of viewers.

oh and here is the video i was speaking of earlier. Kind of Pisses me off and Makes TNA Seem like WWE which i think TNA should try there hardest to get away from so if they do go to mondays the wrestling fan who don't like what WWE is doing can view TNA for something different.

SHIT vid is down already. i downloaded it so i might reup it later.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 19 January 2010, 05:03:04 PM
Oh and just thought i would post this

Quote
NoDQ.com

A fan that regularly attends the TNA Impact tapings sent out this message:

Hey guys. I'm one of the hardcore TNA fans who you see regularly on iMPACT! and TNA PPV. You probably recognize me as the guy who wears a shirt and tie to the shows.

I've seen a lot of posts claiming that the biggest thing wrong with TNA right now is us, the loyal fans in the iMPACT! Zone.

I'd like to give you a little perspective on things. There is a group of about 12-20 of us who are at every show we can attend (Collectively known as the "Crucial Crew", which is why you see us throw up the 'c' hand signal). And we DO NOT like the direction this company is going. Therefore, we express our displeasure in hopes that management will listen. Why? Because we LOVE TNA, and will not stand idly by while it gets raped by Hogan and his boys. If we were season ticket holders for a sports team, this would be expected, would it not?

Last night at Genesis was a major event in the growing war between the TNA loyalists and the Hoganites. I can tell you that very real battle lines are being drawn within the organization, and the conflict will get a lot worse.

Again, we LOVE TNA. So when a man who built his career and reputation on WWF Sports Entertainment comes in, changes the things that make TNA unique and basically tells us that the TNA model is broken and that "the smart marks in the front" (read Hogan's IGN interview) don't matter, aren't representative of mainstream America and so should be ignored- Yeah, we're gonna be pissed.

Last night was remarkable in that for the first time ever a TNA producer came down into the pit where we stand, grabbed my friend by the shirt and actually threatened to ban us from the building if we didn't stop with the "vulgarity and the negativity". From reports, this heat came directly from "Dixie and Terry who were pissed that we didn't put Morely over during his match with Daniels. Are you kidding? This happened during the Pope v Wolfe match, and totally killed the crowd. If you were wondering why the crowd was so dead during what was a great wrestling match, that's why.

Here's the thing though... We've become friends with a lot of the wrestlers, and they all love our energy, enthusiasm and passion, and have and continue to support us. The production crew, who takes heat directly from the top, HATE us, most likely because they are all afraid for their jobs.

Also, all of the Bubba Army idiots and other Hogan marks are now in the iMPACT! Zone and act like the complete tools they are. Oh, but THEY don't get scolded like 5-year olds, even though they are the most offensive people there.

I saw hundreds of people walk out on the show last night, something i've NEVER seen at a PPV. Things are getting weird. Hopefully, Bischoff and Russo are smart enough to use this tension to create compelling TV, but from my perspective, it seems like TNA is dying right before my eyes.

Want some compelling TV? Wait until the entire pit revolts and empties into the ring on live TV. The way things are going, this is not altogether inconceivable.

Rest assured, the Crucial Crew will fight to the end for the TNA we know and love!

I Feel for this guy. i really knows how he feels. with all the goods and bads going on in TNA the die hard fans should not be censored. and no one should threaten to kick someone out just because they didn't root for val fucking venis which is someone who was mid card level over ten years ago and that was his peak.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 20 January 2010, 03:58:08 AM
Quote from: THE Leonardo LunchBoX;37433
WOAH WOAH WOAH HOLD THE PHONE. Tell me you don't think TNA is doing good right now. TELL ME IT.

Anyone who watched that PPV could tell TNA is seriously in trouble. First off, i do love the NOAH ramp that TNA is using but your fans turning on you like that on live PPV isn't good. Second, did  Val Venis really beat Daniels? Daniels a TNA mainstay who has taken some bullshit was on the second match of the card, looking like a cowardly heel jobbing to Val fucking Venis!? REALLY TNA?! I like Val, but Daniels is above that especially since hes been in TNA and Venis hasn't done shit in years. I mean when was the last time before this TNA run he was on TV? Other than that the PPV was really forgettable. Angle vs AJ Styles was fantastic ruined by a shitty finish. Sure it established AJ as a heel but couldn't this have been done post match as Angle handed over the title to Styles? It would have put his talent over instead of him being a heel.

All of Hogans friends need to leave, they need to stop signing people (I love Brian Kendrick as much as the next guy but what does he bring to the table to make him stand out.) and push the young, established TNA talent. That legit looked like WCW 2000 last night instead of TNA and its fucking creepy.

Oh and you can put on a card full of 5* matches but does it make sense? If it doesn't people cans till hate on it.
Don't misunderstand me, I wasn't saying that this last PPV was great, it was the first in months that didn't feature a MOTY candidate, which was surprising based on the main event being AJ vs Angle. This was an alright card, but I have to admit, I skipped the Beer Money vs nWo (v2) match because as good as Beer Money are, I have no interest in seeing Waltman or Hall, or even for that matter, Nash (in the ring at least).

Wolfe vs Pope was good and finally Wolfe gets a win on PPV. The tag title match was good but as I said, taking the gold off the Brits when they're about to do a tour in their home country? Not really making sense to me, as I said, they should have held off the title win until Against All Odds (since 3D will be pre-occupied and Morgan/Hernandez would have had more time to gain experience as a tag team).

Anderson's debut was great, but the match not so much. For someone who isn't a big guy to debut against someone who is 350lbs isn't the easiest thing to pull off as the size difference negated half of his offence. Hopefully we'll see more in his future matches.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 20 January 2010, 04:13:06 AM
Quote from: Adampro123;37445
Oh and just thought i would post this

Quote
NoDQ.com

A fan that regularly attends the TNA Impact tapings sent out this message:

Hey guys. I'm one of the hardcore TNA fans who you see regularly on iMPACT! and TNA PPV. You probably recognize me as the guy who wears a shirt and tie to the shows.

I've seen a lot of posts claiming that the biggest thing wrong with TNA right now is us, the loyal fans in the iMPACT! Zone.

I'd like to give you a little perspective on things. There is a group of about 12-20 of us who are at every show we can attend (Collectively known as the "Crucial Crew", which is why you see us throw up the 'c' hand signal). And we DO NOT like the direction this company is going. Therefore, we express our displeasure in hopes that management will listen. Why? Because we LOVE TNA, and will not stand idly by while it gets raped by Hogan and his boys. If we were season ticket holders for a sports team, this would be expected, would it not?

Last night at Genesis was a major event in the growing war between the TNA loyalists and the Hoganites. I can tell you that very real battle lines are being drawn within the organization, and the conflict will get a lot worse.

Again, we LOVE TNA. So when a man who built his career and reputation on WWF Sports Entertainment comes in, changes the things that make TNA unique and basically tells us that the TNA model is broken and that "the smart marks in the front" (read Hogan's IGN interview) don't matter, aren't representative of mainstream America and so should be ignored- Yeah, we're gonna be pissed.

Last night was remarkable in that for the first time ever a TNA producer came down into the pit where we stand, grabbed my friend by the shirt and actually threatened to ban us from the building if we didn't stop with the "vulgarity and the negativity". From reports, this heat came directly from "Dixie and Terry who were pissed that we didn't put Morely over during his match with Daniels. Are you kidding? This happened during the Pope v Wolfe match, and totally killed the crowd. If you were wondering why the crowd was so dead during what was a great wrestling match, that's why.

Here's the thing though... We've become friends with a lot of the wrestlers, and they all love our energy, enthusiasm and passion, and have and continue to support us. The production crew, who takes heat directly from the top, HATE us, most likely because they are all afraid for their jobs.

Also, all of the Bubba Army idiots and other Hogan marks are now in the iMPACT! Zone and act like the complete tools they are. Oh, but THEY don't get scolded like 5-year olds, even though they are the most offensive people there.

I saw hundreds of people walk out on the show last night, something i've NEVER seen at a PPV. Things are getting weird. Hopefully, Bischoff and Russo are smart enough to use this tension to create compelling TV, but from my perspective, it seems like TNA is dying right before my eyes.

Want some compelling TV? Wait until the entire pit revolts and empties into the ring on live TV. The way things are going, this is not altogether inconceivable.

Rest assured, the Crucial Crew will fight to the end for the TNA we know and love!
I Feel for this guy. i really knows how he feels. with all the goods and bads going on in TNA the die hard fans should not be censored. and no one should threaten to kick someone out just because they didn't root for val fucking venis which is someone who was mid card level over ten years ago and that was his peak.
The "Crucial Crew"? Seriously? Crucial to what? They pay NOTHING to get into shows, they probably don't buy PPV's since they're there live so they think because they live close to Universal that they deserve special treatment? If I went to a wrestling show and paid
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 20 January 2010, 04:29:34 AM
Gonna chime in with my 2 cents.

The impact zone fans or the group of smarks these guys are one of the main reasons why I can't watch TNA (even though i'm going to try watching impact for the next few weeks) as they are just so obnoxious and irritating. I just hate that they usually do the same fucking chant over and over but change the words to suit said wrestler. Maybe that's me just being picky.

All these debut's they made just feel rushed without any sort of forward planning just for the sake of a ratings boost for the live show. I get the impression reading around that they've brought so many guys in they don't no what to do with them. Jeff Hardy still hasn't been seen I believe since the live show, same with Shannon Moore. Val Venis, a incredibly stale character and glorified jobber comes in on PPV and beats one of your homegrown stars? Orlando Jordan and the Nasty Boys, seriously? I would go on and list another instance but it's kind of a spoiler so I won't bother.

I've had a look at some of the upcoming spoilers and for the first time ever i'm going to tune into iMPACT and watch it just to see what it's like.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 20 January 2010, 02:08:11 PM
Does anyone ask WWE fans to stop booing John Cena?
 
 
Just saying.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Mini Kong on 20 January 2010, 03:47:00 PM
Quote from: THE Leonardo LunchBoX;37433
Second, did  Val Venis really beat Daniels? Daniels a TNA mainstay who has taken some bullshit was on the second match of the card, looking like a cowardly heel jobbing to Val fucking Venis!? REALLY TNA?! I like Val, but Daniels is above that especially since hes been in TNA and Venis hasn't done shit in years. I mean when was the last time before this TNA run he was on TV?

All of Hogans friends need to leave, they need to stop signing people (I love Brian Kendrick as much as the next guy but what does he bring to the table to make him stand out.) and push the young, established TNA talent. That legit looked like WCW 2000 last night instead of TNA and its fucking creepy.



*Co-Sign Signature and SSN*
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 20 January 2010, 06:21:43 PM
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;37468
Does anyone ask WWE fans to stop booing John Cena?
 
 
Just saying.
Not in that sense, although they do send sign nazis round and confiscate any signs that are negative to people like Cena (I know as they've done it at a few shows I've attended).
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 20 January 2010, 06:56:23 PM
Quote from: Gorsty;37477
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;37468
Does anyone ask WWE fans to stop booing John Cena?
 
 
Just saying.
Not in that sense, although they do send sign nazis round and confiscate any signs that are negative to people like Cena (I know as they've done it at a few shows I've attended).

Ya, I can agree with you on that, sometimes they go overboard with the sign confiscating, but sometimes they do have to take the offensive stuff away. But again, no one comes out and tells them they have to boo one guy or cheer another, that's just silly.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 20 January 2010, 07:26:42 PM
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;37478
Quote from: Gorsty;37477
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;37468
Does anyone ask WWE fans to stop booing John Cena?
 
 
Just saying.
Not in that sense, although they do send sign nazis round and confiscate any signs that are negative to people like Cena (I know as they've done it at a few shows I've attended).

Ya, I can agree with you on that, sometimes they go overboard with the sign confiscating, but sometimes they do have to take the offensive stuff away. But again, no one comes out and tells them they have to boo one guy or cheer another, that's just silly.
But they didn't tell them who to boo and who to cheer, they told them not to pull stupid shit like turning their backs on a show, especially when, as I mentioned, you are at the front of crowd and obviously will not only look bad to new viewers, but also looks bad on the company.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 20 January 2010, 07:33:46 PM
http://impactwrestling.com/Content.aspx?ID=31081
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 20 January 2010, 07:44:55 PM
Quote from: Gorsty;37479
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;37478
Quote from: Gorsty;37477
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;37468
Does anyone ask WWE fans to stop booing John Cena?
 
 
Just saying.
Not in that sense, although they do send sign nazis round and confiscate any signs that are negative to people like Cena (I know as they've done it at a few shows I've attended).

Ya, I can agree with you on that, sometimes they go overboard with the sign confiscating, but sometimes they do have to take the offensive stuff away. But again, no one comes out and tells them they have to boo one guy or cheer another, that's just silly.
But they didn't tell them who to boo and who to cheer, they told them not to pull stupid shit like turning their backs on a show, especially when, as I mentioned, you are at the front of crowd and obviously will not only look bad to new viewers, but also looks bad on the company.

That's the point, it's supposed to look bad on the company...
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 20 January 2010, 07:53:26 PM
Quote from: Adampro123;37480
http://impactwrestling.com/Content.aspx?ID=31081
Those fucking morons recording it really made themselves seem mature. There was nothing in there about them telling them not to boo certain individual talent or anything like that, but I think to some extent, toning down the language is fair enough, especially during a segment which is airing about 8:15pm (which I believe is before the watershed/"safe harbour" in the US).

Now my thoughts on this have been stated clearly enough above, and the TNA guy said the same as I did, if you buy a ticket to an event, feel free to do what you want, but if you're being given something for free, then you have to follow certain guidelines (since they are effectively part of the show).
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 20 January 2010, 08:19:55 PM
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;37481
Quote from: Gorsty;37479
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;37478
Quote from: Gorsty;37477
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;37468
Does anyone ask WWE fans to stop booing John Cena?
 
 
Just saying.
Not in that sense, although they do send sign nazis round and confiscate any signs that are negative to people like Cena (I know as they've done it at a few shows I've attended).

Ya, I can agree with you on that, sometimes they go overboard with the sign confiscating, but sometimes they do have to take the offensive stuff away. But again, no one comes out and tells them they have to boo one guy or cheer another, that's just silly.
But they didn't tell them who to boo and who to cheer, they told them not to pull stupid shit like turning their backs on a show, especially when, as I mentioned, you are at the front of crowd and obviously will not only look bad to new viewers, but also looks bad on the company.

That's the point, it's supposed to look bad on the company...
Well, for a company they supposedly "LOVE", surely they should support them during times of change. As I mentioned, as much as I liked the 6 sided ring, the 4 sided ring is more traditional and has made people who I know never watched TNA into giving them a chance and watching more regularly.

Personally, if I were TNA, I'd give more severe punishments as they are clearly trying to get themselves over as opposed to the talent.

I remember when I was at the iMPACT Zone, those guys seem to think because they live close by that they should get special treatment, I actually tried to get close to the rail, then they come in and decided that because they are there all the time that I should move to accomodate them, they are arrogant assholes, and until TNA moves out of the iMPACT Zone and goes on the road more (perhaps with a live Thursday show somewhere down the line) they will have these morons thinking they are bigger than the show.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 20 January 2010, 08:52:52 PM
I love the kid who brought up a point to that could easily be done and the dude just shut him down. You really can't do that to a crowd. Most of the wrestlers in that promotion are indy vets who have had to deal with more than distracting chants and learned to deal with it. Plus its wrestling, 90% of the fans have nothing better to do than bitch. If they don't like something they are gonna complain. If TNA doesn't like it, change what they are doing.

Also:

Quote
DrColtCabana (http://twitter.com/DrColtCabana)                              
         RT @facdaniels (http://twitter.com/facdaniels) Good & bad news for TNA fans-> Bad: the 6 sided ring isn't coming back Good: next month we'll implement two three sided rings

Daniels is the shit.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 28 January 2010, 08:38:35 PM
Rob Terry just won the global championship from Eric young on there UK Tour...

Who booked that shit?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 28 January 2010, 09:08:23 PM
Quote from: Adampro123;37495
Rob Terry just won the global championship from Eric young on there UK Tour...

Who booked that shit?

Do you really wanna open that can of worms? :lol
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 28 January 2010, 09:27:27 PM
(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wrestlingworld.it%2FHistorical%2Fwwhallofshame%2Fvincerusso%2Fvince%2520russo%2520in%2520nwa%2520tna%25201.jpg&hash=d57f5da9fd19caa51449716ac3a5accafff56623)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 28 January 2010, 10:15:48 PM
Who knows, Rob Terry hasn't been given much exposure on TV, and in matches he has been in, he has been the one to take the fall. I'm hoping we get a match at the Manchester event tomorrow so I can see first hand if he is any good.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 29 January 2010, 09:47:52 AM
He'll probably end up losing the title back to someone before the tour is over.

Whatever happens, maybe it can be defended once in a while on TV now.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 30 January 2010, 12:57:55 PM
Rob Terry isn't as bad as he has looked on TV on the rare occasions he's been in the ring, he still has some work to do, but he isn't as awful as some people seem to think.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 31 January 2010, 03:12:47 PM
Quote
On his Twitter account, Chris Jericho just took a shot at Eric Bischoff saying, "Bischoffs right I can't headline in TNA...cos I'm not in my 50s."

This was made in response to comments that Bischoff made on The Bubba The Love Sponge show yesterday, where he said that back in WCW they didn't think that Jericho was World Champion material.  That was part of the reason that Jericho jumped to WWE in the first place.

:giggle
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 3 February 2010, 09:45:07 PM
UK fans now get the choice to support TNA and buy PPVs as they will be streaming live on TNAVideoVault.com for $14.99 (which with the current exchange rate works out about
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 5 February 2010, 01:48:15 AM
Quote from: Gorsty;37778
UK fans now get the choice to support TNA and buy PPVs as they will be streaming live on TNAVideoVault.com for $14.99 (which with the current exchange rate works out about
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 5 February 2010, 09:02:06 PM
When I think about it TNA is like a really bad indy. Horrible booking, the main event with the old WWE stars to try and draw the crowds in and young awesome undercard trying to get there name out there.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 6 February 2010, 02:12:54 AM
Quote from: THE Leonardo LunchBoX;37837
When I think about it TNA is like a really bad indy. Horrible booking, the main event with the old WWE stars to try and draw the crowds in and young awesome undercard trying to get there name out there.
Do you pay any attention at all you moron? The main event for Against All Odds (TNA's next PPV) is AJ Styles vs Samoa Joe for the TNA Championship, and I'm pretty sure neither have ever been signed to WWE contracts
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 6 February 2010, 02:58:24 AM
Thats the main event. But there 3 biggest stars are Hogan, Angle and Styles. 2 of which are former WWE Champions, the third has the WWE flavor of Ric Flair managing him. Furthermore the focus of TNA has been on the NWO, Mick Foley, Eric Bischoff and Jeff Jarrett
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 6 February 2010, 03:16:03 AM
Quote from: Gorsty;37846
Quote from: THE Leonardo LunchBoX;37837
When I think about it TNA is like a really bad indy. Horrible booking, the main event with the old WWE stars to try and draw the crowds in and young awesome undercard trying to get there name out there.

Do you pay any attention at all you moron? The main event for Against All Odds (TNA's next PPV) is AJ Styles vs Samoa Joe for the TNA Championship, and I'm pretty sure neither have ever been signed to WWE contracts



Keep the name calling to yourself please.... he said nothing to warrant that.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 6 February 2010, 04:33:47 AM
Pffft i don't care, i just shot his theory to shit.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Siva on 8 February 2010, 07:11:37 AM
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;37595
Quote
On his Twitter account, Chris Jericho just took a shot at Eric Bischoff saying, "Bischoffs right I can't headline in TNA...cos I'm not in my 50s."

This was made in response to comments that Bischoff made on The Bubba The Love Sponge show yesterday, where he said that back in WCW they didn't think that Jericho was World Champion material.  That was part of the reason that Jericho jumped to WWE in the first place.


:giggle


Haha Jericho's hilarious.

On the subject of TNA I think it's terrible right now. It's just not appealing to me anymore.

I will say though that a couple weeks ago (maybe longer) they had a tag team match with some new guys named Generation Me (I think) against MCMG and that match was awesome. I might tune in for one of the mid card matches but I'm almost guaranteed to change the channel within the first 30 minutes.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 17 February 2010, 08:22:45 PM
AHHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa

MAIN EVENT WAS BURKE VS KENNEDY HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

TOLD ALL YOU MOTHERFUCKERSS
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 18 February 2010, 02:09:53 AM
Quote from: THE Leonardo LunchBoX;38129
AHHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa

MAIN EVENT WAS BURKE VS KENNEDY HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

TOLD ALL YOU MOTHERFUCKERSS
And your point is? TNA had a PPV that was main evented by 2 guys WWE fucked up on. Burke had so much potential in WWE and was overlooked in favour of Sylvester fucking Terkay. Kennedy was released because he got injured a few times (which is strange since he's done the same in TNA he did in WWE, including 3 matches in 1 night and didn't get injured).

Burke has also done more and showed more talent in the 8 months he's been in TNA than he did in 4 years under contract with WWE (or the 2 of those he was on TV specifically), he's probably had more televised matches too
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 22 February 2010, 04:03:57 AM
The more and more I see of Matt Morgan, the more I think to myself that the WWE should try and pull out all the stops they can to sign him when his contract comes to an end as I just him being the next Batista type guy and no that's no an insult
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 1 March 2010, 09:31:02 PM
Quote from: Mick Clique;38429
The more and more I see of Matt Morgan, the more I think to myself that the WWE should try and pull out all the stops they can to sign him when his contract comes to an end as I just him being the next Batista type guy and no that's no an insult


Morgan is fantastic for a big man.

If WWE was to push him right, he could be a star for them.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 2 March 2010, 12:13:26 AM
Thats the problem, for the most part, WWE don't know how to push more than 4 guys at once. They've had Morgan under contract before, they let him go and he's proved how stupid they were to let him go. Elijah Burke was under contract with WWE for 4 years and spent half of that in developmental, and when he was on the main roster, he was second to Sylverster Terkay who was useless. WWE had the option of signing Nigel McGuinness, they didn't act quick enough, he went to TNA and made a big impact on his first night in the company.

Look at the guys who went the other way. Chris Harris being the best example, he was a great worker in TNA, he was over, he could wrestle, he had a WWE style, they signed him and sent him to developmental, brought him up with a stupid name and he lasted a month.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 2 March 2010, 12:27:01 AM
I wouldn't say they were stupid for letting Morgan go as he's had regular tv time and bettered his skills so he would be coming back to the WWE if it happened in a much better position

I don't share the same love for Burke / Dinero what ever you want to call him, so him being cut from the WWE really didn't dissapoint me.

Nigel it depends on what story you want to believe, whether you believe the insiders who said he failed a screening test, or himself who said the WWE wasn't apparently stalling.

Braden Walker attributed to his own downfall showing up in fucking awful looking shape AND he was apparently the one who chose his ringname I tihnk
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 2 March 2010, 01:32:01 AM
Plus around the time Morgan debuted Brock was there.
Burke after leaving Terkay was one of the focal points of ECW.
Other than his first feud with Angle McGuiness has done jack shit in TNA and is basically a afterthough.
And Harris came to WWE out of shape with a chip on his shoulder.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Siva on 2 March 2010, 03:53:23 PM
TNA seems to thing that bringing in all these old superstars will make them better...

The thing is, TNA could have HBK, Triple H, Undertaker, John Morrison, and Chris Jericho and it will still be the same old shitty TNA. Having a good roster does not make a good show.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 2 March 2010, 04:14:11 PM
I'd rather have a good roster than a RAW roster.

I'll admit, last weeks iMPACT was a very poor one, but even then, the wrestling on the show (for the most part) was better than anything on RAW last night.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 2 March 2010, 04:37:05 PM
Quote from: Gorsty;38783
Thats the problem, for the most part, WWE don't know how to push more than 4 guys at once. They've had Morgan under contract before, they let him go and he's proved how stupid they were to let him go. Elijah Burke was under contract with WWE for 4 years and spent half of that in developmental, and when he was on the main roster, he was second to Sylverster Terkay who was useless. WWE had the option of signing Nigel McGuinness, they didn't act quick enough, he went to TNA and made a big impact on his first night in the company.

Look at the guys who went the other way. Chris Harris being the best example, he was a great worker in TNA, he was over, he could wrestle, he had a WWE style, they signed him and sent him to developmental, brought him up with a stupid name and he lasted a month.


I don't think that's fair. Morgan was in WWE when he was, what, 22-23? Hard to ask someone to be a main eventer at that age. maybe he shouldn't have been cut, but sometimes you just don't see things like that coming. it happens in sports all the time. A team cuts or trades a player thinking they won't do much and they go to another team and become quality players...

As for Burke, I'm pretty sure you're cutting off a lot of his history, there was a long period of time on ECW where he wasn't with Terkay and he was flying solo, and he never really got that over.

Harris came to WWE fat and out of shape. If I'm not mistaken he hasn't been re-signed by TNA so he can't be all that good. It had nothing to do with his name or gimmick.

McGuinness? Again, unfair to say anything about him seeing as you probably weren't in on his negotiations with either WWE or TNA. Maybe it was him who decided not to sign with WWE because he wanted to go straight onto the roster and not go through developmental.

Which brings up a good point. Why do you mention people being sent to developmental as if it's a bad thing? These guys shouldn't be treated as superstars the day they come into the company, they're nobodies when they get to WWE and they have to pay their dues. Do you think if TNA had a developmental system, they'd let all these guys overpass it and go straight to television? It's nonsense. Even Danielson went through FCW but so far he seems like a team player who's going to pay his dues and not have anything handed to him.

Burke, Morgan, McGuinness... they're getting main event spots handed to them because they're ex-WWE guys. Don't get me wrong, they're good enough to justify their positions, but the fact that they have recognition plays a part in it.

It's unfair to compare what they did in WWE years ago, when they were years younger, had less experience and weren't over, to what they do when they come into TNA WITH WWE experience and indy experience and much more maturity.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 2 March 2010, 05:39:45 PM
I just think the whole developmental process should be used for people who, and this might just be me who thinks this, need to develop their wrestling ability.

Someone like a Chris Harris who had been working at a level above what many people on the WWE's main roster can when he was working with James Storm shortly before him leaving TNA (and the way he left is possibly the main reason TNA haven't re-signed him), he didn't need developing, he could work a WWE style match. Personally, if I went to a job where I knew I was as good as at least 75% of the other employees and was left doing menial tasks (which would be the real world equivelant to WWE's developmental) then I'd likely get disillusioned with the job, not saying that his weight gain was connected to that, but its possible that they waited too long to pull the trigger on it.

As for Burke, yes he led the New Breed for all of 5 months, but what did he accomplish as part of it? Nothing. As soon as that gimmick died because all but 1 of the ECW Originals was released he disappeared for months at a time, making random one-off appearances here and there before being released.

As for Morgan, yeah, he was younger, but really, you've got a 7 foot guy who is quick, agile and able to work, and can also cut a promo when needed, and what did he get? A stuttering gimmick. Then he vanished again, come back as Carlito's "protection", F5'd the Big Show through an announce table one week then the following week was beaten up by the Mexicools and subsequently released.

WWE have dropped the ball on a number of talents, Morgan and Burke were just 2 of the main ones.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 2 March 2010, 05:58:59 PM
Quote from: Gorsty;38805
I just think the whole developmental process should be used for people who, and this might just be me who thinks this, need to develop their wrestling ability.

Someone like a Chris Harris who had been working at a level above what many people on the WWE's main roster can when he was working with James Storm shortly before him leaving TNA (and the way he left is possibly the main reason TNA haven't re-signed him), he didn't need developing, he could work a WWE style match. Personally, if I went to a job where I knew I was as good as at least 75% of the other employees and was left doing menial tasks (which would be the real world equivelant to WWE's developmental) then I'd likely get disillusioned with the job, not saying that his weight gain was connected to that, but its possible that they waited too long to pull the trigger on it.

As for Burke, yes he led the New Breed for all of 5 months, but what did he accomplish as part of it? Nothing. As soon as that gimmick died because all but 1 of the ECW Originals was released he disappeared for months at a time, making random one-off appearances here and there before being released.

As for Morgan, yeah, he was younger, but really, you've got a 7 foot guy who is quick, agile and able to work, and can also cut a promo when needed, and what did he get? A stuttering gimmick. Then he vanished again, come back as Carlito's "protection", F5'd the Big Show through an announce table one week then the following week was beaten up by the Mexicools and subsequently released.

WWE have dropped the ball on a number of talents, Morgan and Burke were just 2 of the main ones.



You're once again ignoring the fact that Harris came to WWE fat and out of shape. If that doesn't scream need for developmental I don't know what does. Also, it's unfair for you to claim that he knew how to work the WWE style, seeing as he was never in the WWE before that.

As for Burke, he had 5 months to get over with his gimmick, and as you said, it went nowhere. Maybe that's Burke's fault, and not WWE's? It's not like he wasn't given airtime during that period...

I'm not going to say that Morgan wasn't mis-used when he was in WWE, but once again, you have to realize that 23 year olds don't exactly jump up the rankings in the WWE like hot-cakes. Look at the main event now, and try to find me someone under 30. you'd have a hard time doing that. Even a lot of the upper-mid carders are at that age or older. Clearly he wasn't ready for the main event then, and it even took him a few years to jump up to that level in TNA.

Of course WWE's dropped the ball on people before, but at the size of their roster and the number of people they bring in every year, that's to be expected.

Clearly, those guys we're talking about weren't ready for the main event when they were the WWE.

Also, to question WWE's developmental system is simply bogus. Everyone should spend time in developmental, or just about everyone.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 2 March 2010, 06:12:16 PM
Quote from: Hollywood Prax;38806
Quote from: Gorsty;38805
I just think the whole developmental process should be used for people who, and this might just be me who thinks this, need to develop their wrestling ability.

Someone like a Chris Harris who had been working at a level above what many people on the WWE's main roster can when he was working with James Storm shortly before him leaving TNA (and the way he left is possibly the main reason TNA haven't re-signed him), he didn't need developing, he could work a WWE style match. Personally, if I went to a job where I knew I was as good as at least 75% of the other employees and was left doing menial tasks (which would be the real world equivelant to WWE's developmental) then I'd likely get disillusioned with the job, not saying that his weight gain was connected to that, but its possible that they waited too long to pull the trigger on it.

As for Burke, yes he led the New Breed for all of 5 months, but what did he accomplish as part of it? Nothing. As soon as that gimmick died because all but 1 of the ECW Originals was released he disappeared for months at a time, making random one-off appearances here and there before being released.

As for Morgan, yeah, he was younger, but really, you've got a 7 foot guy who is quick, agile and able to work, and can also cut a promo when needed, and what did he get? A stuttering gimmick. Then he vanished again, come back as Carlito's "protection", F5'd the Big Show through an announce table one week then the following week was beaten up by the Mexicools and subsequently released.

WWE have dropped the ball on a number of talents, Morgan and Burke were just 2 of the main ones.


You're once again ignoring the fact that Harris came to WWE fat and out of shape. If that doesn't scream need for developmental I don't know what does. Also, it's unfair for you to claim that he knew how to work the WWE style, seeing as he was never in the WWE before that.

As for Burke, he had 5 months to get over with his gimmick, and as you said, it went nowhere. Maybe that's Burke's fault, and not WWE's? It's not like he wasn't given airtime during that period...

I'm not going to say that Morgan wasn't mis-used when he was in WWE, but once again, you have to realize that 23 year olds don't exactly jump up the rankings in the WWE like hot-cakes. Look at the main event now, and try to find me someone under 30. you'd have a hard time doing that. Even a lot of the upper-mid carders are at that age or older. Clearly he wasn't ready for the main event then, and it even took him a few years to jump up to that level in TNA.

Of course WWE's dropped the ball on people before, but at the size of their roster and the number of people they bring in every year, that's to be expected.

Clearly, those guys we're talking about weren't ready for the main event when they were the WWE.

Also, to question WWE's developmental system is simply bogus. Everyone should spend time in developmental, or just about everyone.
They aren't expected to be main eventers from the start, but having them on TV (especially in Morgan's case) would have been more beneficial to him than having 3 failed runs because WWE's creative were too moronic to see potential. Just because he was young doesn't mean anything, the guy had talent, he had the look, yet WWE failed to utilize him.

And no, not everyone should spend time in developmental. Just using it as an example since TNA have recently announced a working relationship with a wrestling school/indy fed, it makes perfect sense for TNA to send Lacey Von Erich there because she needs to develop her ring work, it wouldn't however make sense to send someone like Daniels there because he doesn't need to be, it is a waste of a resource that the company could use.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: chappers on 2 March 2010, 06:31:33 PM
I don't see why it's such a bad thing to put someone in developmental. It's like the reserves team in football, if they are working off an injury or ring rust they can have a lighter schedule to get used to wrestling again. WWE can also test a wrestler to see whether they have what they want and if they are worth keeping or not.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 2 March 2010, 06:56:28 PM
It definitely makes sense to put nearly everyone in the developmental system. Even Daniels, who needs to get used to working a different style. If you're good enough, you don't spend to much time there. I'd bet you anything most people coming up would spend time in TNA's system if they had one. Then again 3/4 of their roster has wrestled at a higher level in WWE ;)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 3 March 2010, 06:30:48 AM
I get sending guys coming back from long lay-offs due to injury etc there to work off any ring rust, but then again, not everyone would need it.

Surely you'd sign someone based on scouting them and seeing them in action, so why would they need to go to a developmental territory to see how they work?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: chappers on 3 March 2010, 08:41:22 AM
Quote from: Gorsty;38833
I get sending guys coming back from long lay-offs due to injury etc there to work off any ring rust, but then again, not everyone would need it.

Surely you'd sign someone based on scouting them and seeing them in action, so why would they need to go to a developmental territory to see how they work?
They would most likely be scouts, not necessarily writers or anything like that. If they can see what they can do in developmental they can write off certain moves, check their gimmick for storyline ideas. I'm not saying it applies to everyone, but I don't get why you are against it applying to the bigger stars. If I sent someone to developmental and they started bitching about it, I would just release them, the likelihood is that person thinks they are bigger then the business, which is the last thing I would want for future use and before they are a huge star.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 3 March 2010, 11:01:00 PM
Quote from: Gorsty;38833
I get sending guys coming back from long lay-offs due to injury etc there to work off any ring rust, but then again, not everyone would need it.

Surely you'd sign someone based on scouting them and seeing them in action, so why would they need to go to a developmental territory to see how they work?


Because in developmental, they teach you the WWE style, the writers and road agents follow you to see what kind of role and gimmick to give you, other wrestlers who don't have time to scout you when you're not in the company can scout you now, and you can get accustomed to working in the company which is obviously different than working in the indies.

There's really a bunch of reasons. You can't expect them to just thrust someone on the main roster with no WWE experience. It makes no sense.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 5 March 2010, 08:55:49 AM
Quote from: Wrestlingnewsworld.com
Things at the Micro Championship Wrestling taping at  Universal Studios in Orlando, Florida are out of control bad.  Tim  Capture tells me a giant midget just completely pulled his singlet  down to show his bare backside and deliver a stinkface to another  midget.

Apparently the production is terrible and the announcer is so bad he  talks during matches.  The crowd has grown disgruntled and 75% have  left.

Jason Hervey and Eric Bischoff are upset at ringside but have no idea  what to do.
I'm not quite sure what this exactly is, but I think this is the funniest thing I've ever read on the newsboards.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 5 March 2010, 04:23:59 PM
I read somewhere that the Bischoff / Hervey partnership whatever it is overseeing some midget promotion which I believe is no way related to TNA or Spike, but they are filming it at the impact zone.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 9 March 2010, 02:15:11 PM
You know, the Destination X card is actually looking pretty good at the moment.

Machine Guns vs. Young Bucks in an Ultimate X for the #1 Contendership to the World Tag Titles, Mr. Anderson vs. Kurt Angle, Shannon Moore vs. Doug Williams & Abyss vs. AJ for the World Title (Always had good matches together back in 05, hoping they can still go) -

I'll probably order if they don't stack it with shit.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 9 March 2010, 04:43:58 PM
we might get pope vs wolfe again too which has proven to be a very good to great match time after time. also looking forward to beer money vs morgan and hernandez.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 16 March 2010, 01:50:55 PM
Did anyone watch the Daily Show last night?

They were comparing politics to wrestling. So they compared it to how Shawn Michaels is angry at the Undertaker.

Then they brought out Mick Foley in a TNA shirt.


Fail.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 21 March 2010, 04:26:35 AM
Quote from: WrestleNewz.com
After Bischoff bragging on Facebook about  the $50,000 check he got last quarter from WWE for sales for his book,  WWEShop.com has reduced the price of it to a mere $1.98. The paperback  is available for $4.98.

Completely unnecessary but funny anyway...shows that they are listening.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 21 March 2010, 06:25:08 AM
LMAO.

Enjoy the much smaller cheque you get this year, Eric.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 23 March 2010, 01:45:15 AM
Quote from: Wrestlenewz.com
- TNA star Rob Van Dam posted the  following message on his official website over the weekend. Van Dam says  he showed up to the airport on Saturday to fly to Orlando assuming he  was booked for last night
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 23 March 2010, 04:29:26 PM
From Jim Ross' Twitter:

Quote
"UfC fights end like old school pro wrestling bouts used to do on reg basis...with winners & losers. Non finish main events r weak."

:giggle
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 26 March 2010, 10:16:49 PM
Quote from: Forceofwrestling.com
One often-overlooked factor in TNA
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: chappers on 26 March 2010, 11:45:16 PM
They don't need every ex WWE guy, which seems to be the policy they are taking. Sure, there's some good people they have picked up, but then you have these slow 50 year olds who are expended of their value, yet they have them pushed to the top of the company. I read an article on The Sun the other day by Paul Heyman looking at wrestling for the past decade, it seems like TNA could have been strong competition a couple years ago, but now it's just lost it's footing and in my eyes, turned it's back on the foundation of the company. I don't really hear about Samoa Joe much anymore, yet he is probably one of the most promising talents they have. This is the problem, so many good up and coming wrestlers who have stuck with the company and could actually push the company in a better direction, but instead they utilise the crap and make poor moves with no real value to them. I'm not saying that they shouldn't have any older/wiser wrestlers who have value to them, they just don't need to constantly change their roster and add more and more.

I just went on to the TNA website which had a YouTube video stating it's taking over Monday nights. Fair enough they are trying to push themselves and get their name out there, but it almost comes across as a joke. Until TNA has a direction and can decide on who they will use, I don't see it going anywhere. It's other things as well, like every ex WWE wrestler has a cheap version of their name (Six Pac, Taz (without the extra z)). Can they also just stop with the whole poking at WWE. It's not bigger then WWE and at the rate it's going, it never will be.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 27 March 2010, 12:03:32 AM
Quote from: chappers;39637
They don't need every ex WWE guy, which seems to be the policy they are taking. Sure, there's some good people they have picked up, but then you have these slow 50 year olds who are expended of their value, yet they have them pushed to the top of the company. I read an article on The Sun the other day by Paul Heyman looking at wrestling for the past decade, it seems like TNA could have been strong competition a couple years ago, but now it's just lost it's footing and in my eyes, turned it's back on the foundation of the company. I don't really hear about Samoa Joe much anymore, yet he is probably one of the most promising talents they have. This is the problem, so many good up and coming wrestlers who have stuck with the company and could actually push the company in a better direction, but instead they utilise the crap and make poor moves with no real value to them. I'm not saying that they shouldn't have any older/wiser wrestlers who have value to them, they just don't need to constantly change their roster and add more and more.

I just went on to the TNA website which had a YouTube video stating it's taking over Monday nights. Fair enough they are trying to push themselves and get their name out there, but it almost comes across as a joke. Until TNA has a direction and can decide on who they will use, I don't see it going anywhere. It's other things as well, like every ex WWE wrestler has a cheap version of their name (Six Pac, Taz (without the extra z)). Can they also just stop with the whole poking at WWE. It's not bigger then WWE and at the rate it's going, it never will be.

Well his name was Sixx pac or Syxx pac in WCW and taz name was actually just taz in ECW before WWE got him and changed it to tazz. i don't think they could use x pac or tazz and i don't really see how thats any sort of big deal at all.

i agree about them not needing to pick up every former WWE guy out there and stuff but if you look at it usually only the good ones last longer than a month.

and yeah they sure do know how to waste good talent though. most the time wolfe and joe don't even get to be on TV which is why i think they should have a second show like smackdown was to raw back in the day or just make a lot of roster cuts.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 27 March 2010, 08:32:48 PM
Here's my view on the whole matter:

In business, you really can't have any success if you don't suffer first. I anticipated news like this to come out about TNA having financial troubles, because it's inevitable, even if they were doing better in the ratings. They need to promote themselves and show people that they can be on the same playing surface as the WWE.

And to do that means higher expenses.

That being said, I think TNA is going about it the wrong way, and i'm not sure if they're even ready. Why do they need to dethrone WWE? Why not make Thursday nights their nights, or go up against Smackdown, where they might actually have a chance of passing them with a live show? Why go up against the beast you know you can't beat?

Now they've backed themselves up against a wall. Continue down this road and you'll go out of business. They're handicapped with commitments to Hogan, Bischoff, Nash, Flair, Hardy, RVD, Kennedy and all these other guys, they have a WWE sized roster for an ROH level promotion, and their show is such a clusterfuck that you forget who's on the show and who isn't while you're watching, and frankly, why you're even watching it.

In so many weeks on Monday night, even the January 4th show, have they really done ANYTHING to get people watching Raw to say, "oh fuck, TNA is doing WHAT?" and change the channel? Other than parts of the Jan. 4th show, it certainly hasn't made me even think of changing the channel. And  they're not going to, not in the near future and not with the crap I read about what goes on there.

Then again, if they mail it in and leave Monday nights, they're admitting defeat, and admitting they're a second rate company. If they do that, they will NEVER have ANY chance of growing into proper competition.

Although they try to be, they're NOT WCW. WCW had the backing of people with a lot of money and a lot of connections that got them good TV deals, and got people excited about the product (even though it was for the most part shit) and got people to change the channel. And allowed them to run up costs without worrying about going off the air.

While TNA has most of the people that made WCW a competitor, they're missing that guy willing to spend all his money to make them a success. Panda Energy is not Ted Turner. And Ric Flair, Hulk Hogan, Kevin Nash, Jeff Jarrett, and all the rest, they're not the draws they were 15 years ago.

TNA is stuck between a rock and a hard place, and I'll be EXTREMELY impressed if they find a way out unscathed.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Fluttershy on 1 April 2010, 05:31:33 PM
I
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 1 April 2010, 06:21:16 PM
Quote from: Booty luv;39968
I
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 3 April 2010, 09:14:12 AM
know who i hate? Shannon moore! the only reason he has a job is because he's friends with Jeff Hardy. he's ok at best in the ring i can not stand his style, look or attitude. and i don't think the impact zone fans like him either at the last PPV when he faced doug Williams they were chanting "please no moore" which has been my favorite chant i have heard in years :D

1 bright things i will say about him is when he was teaming with jimmy wang yang in the WWE feuding with Miz and Morrison in there first real tag team feud he and yang made a good team even though most of that was the yang.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 3 April 2010, 07:22:04 PM
Quote from: Adampro123;40071
know who i hate? Shannon moore! the only reason he has a job is because he's friends with Jeff Hardy. he's ok at best in the ring i can not stand his style, look or attitude. and i don't think the impact zone fans like him either at the last PPV when he faced doug Williams they were chanting "please no moore" which has been my favorite chant i have heard in years :D

1 bright things i will say about him is when he was teaming with jimmy wang yang in the WWE feuding with Miz and Morrison in there first real tag team feud he and yang made a good team even though most of that was the yang.
(Y)(Y)(Y)(Y)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 6 April 2010, 06:45:55 PM
(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg59.imageshack.us%2Fimg59%2F4572%2Fkennedymrcagekey.jpg&hash=a22738805ac4ff5c3a8bcb5e53b7c77c957eb113)

:lol:lol:lol

(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg175.imageshack.us%2Fimg175%2F8277%2Fojwax.jpg&hash=a049efbce29c722f6bc0ded969a89b93b222d275)
That's right, OJ squirted his body AND face with lotion. Found it kinda disturbing.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 12 April 2010, 04:37:09 AM
Quote from: WrestleNewz.com
- TNA is looking at holding  this year
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 12 April 2010, 03:40:07 PM
Quote
Despite the best efforts of rumors on the Internet over the weekend, neither Steve Corino nor TNA President Dixie Carter passed away over the weekend.
The Carter rumor was started on twitter after the death of Broadway star Dixie Carter at the age of 70 from cancer-related issues over the weekend.

No idea where the Corino rumor started but Corino issued an email from Japan, where he's touring for ZERO-ONE MAX, announcing, "I am not f***ing dead!"

Rofl.


Also, good article by Steven Carapola, but it's wishful thinking for the most part:

TEN THINGS TNA MIGHT WANT TO THINK ABOUT BEFORE THEIR NEXT IMPACT TAPINGS | PWInsider.com (http://www.pwinsider.com/article/46639/ten-things-tna-might-want-to-think-about-before-their-next-impact-tapings.html?p=1)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 12 April 2010, 05:15:25 PM
I'm sure those main events for bound for glory probably won't be the main events for bound for glory. matter of fact i don't even know if jeff will be around by then.

flair vs sting i could understand but the match is gonna suck.
hogan vs angle i don't get. these 2 already had a match where kurt won.
AJ vs Jeff i kind of get though these 2 have already had a match as well. i would rather see AJ vs RVD.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 12 April 2010, 05:19:26 PM
Quote from: Adampro123;40482
I'm sure those main events for bound for glory probably won't be the main events for bound for glory. matter of fact i don't even know if jeff will be around by then.

flair vs sting i could understand but the match is gonna suck.
hogan vs angle i don't get. these 2 already had a match where kurt won.
AJ vs Jeff i kind of get though these 2 have already had a match as well. i would rather see AJ vs RVD.


Ya, I was going to say that Flair/Sting I understand based on the history, but at the same it's unnecessary. They've wrestled 20 thousand times, leave it alone.

AJ/Jeff would be a good match but again, unnecessary. I'd bet Jeff is back in WWE by then anyway.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Awesome on 13 April 2010, 09:48:40 PM
Quote from: PraxFan;40485
I'd bet Jeff is back in WWE by then anyway.


Whatever happened to Jeff's court appearance for being busted with drugs? I would've thought he'd be in prison by now, judging from what was said at the time.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 14 April 2010, 04:10:10 AM
Quote
[/FONT]ODB (http://www.gerweck.net/odb.htm) publicly expressed some  frustration with the current creative direction. She wrote regarding  Impact on her Facebook page, "Just watched from my DVR the Knockouts  match. Wow, WTF is happening to our division?" One source echoed similar  sentiments to us this week. They said the Knockout's division has  become quite sad in that most of the girls are fighting hard to stick  together and want to help each other while some forces seem to be  working against them.

(credit: The Wrestling Globe  Newsletter)
Although she's right, it's probably not the smartest thing to be saying unless she's actually trying to find a way out?

Quote
[/SIZE][/SIZE][/FONT]- For what it's  worth, The Honky Tonk Man wrote on Facebook that Christy Hemme's new  three-year deal with TNA is worth $175,000 a year, far more than the  other TNA Knockouts are earning. Honky's Facebook says that Eric  Bischoff played a big part in getting Hemme her new deal. Honky also  claims that Hemme's new deal with TNA has left some of the other  Knockouts upset.
Not sure how he knows this sort of information (presumably he has an insider) but if it's true then that is fucking staggering considering the history of issues they have had regarding their top knockouts leaving because of a poor packet.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 14 April 2010, 04:26:20 AM
Does Hemme even wrestle? Or are they paying her 200K to be a valet? :dohw:
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 14 April 2010, 04:28:18 AM
backstage interviewer
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 14 April 2010, 04:41:30 AM
She may not be worth it but doesn't she have the longest tenure of the women there?  She's been with TNA a long time by now and you've got to expect a raise whether or not it looks like she isn't the biggest contributor.  It's either that or release her....

Also, unless ODB was backstage why was she watching it on DVR instead of live? :giggle
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 14 April 2010, 03:21:34 PM
Although I don't particularly agree with the means in which she stated her frustration, because it comes off as complete unprofessional; I have to agree with what ODB had to say. The KO division when it first came about and well into 2008 was absolutely amazing, the women were having great matches and it was the reason I (and I presume a lot of people) watched iMPACT! at one point. Now, we have these shitty little segments which shit all over everything they tried to build a couple of years back. As far as I'm concerned, the second that Amazing Kong was released; the division was basically gone and buried. This is one of TNA's problems in every regard, they have an AMAZING talent roster - yet feel the need to use it in ways other than the obvious.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 15 April 2010, 12:19:18 AM
I thought the knockouts division was good when it first started but i don't think i was as high on it as some were. sure its taken a new direction because the segments with TBP always got the highest ratings and now that WWe is PG TNA is trying to fill the void of showing skin and that kind of thing.

Quote
Credit: F4WOnline.com

According to Bryan Alvarez, here is much internal concern regarding  the state of Jeff Hardy. Many feel his  work since coming to TNA has been lackluster not to mention that his  promos are rambling and sometimes virtually incoherent.  Several people are comparing his current  state to his previous run in the company, which occurred as a result of  his termination from WWE for erratic behavior, drug use, refusal to enter rehab and  deteriorating ring performance.

I have always though that jeff hardy can only work well in the WWE because they make sure he's not phoning it in or anything like that, in TNA jeff knows he's pretty much bigger than the company so he thinks he can do whatever he wants and suck at it and get away with it. also i think having matt around helps jeff too.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 15 April 2010, 12:20:19 AM
I love that TNA are acting concerned.

YOU HIRED HIM WHEN HE WAS ON A DRUG CONVICTION, YOU SILLY BASTARDS
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 22 April 2010, 02:39:33 AM
One thing that majorly pisses me off is why don't have entrance they videos? I'm not saying they need a big fucking titantron like WWE has, but they have that little video screen what usually shows like 2 graphics for each person at best, can't they put together a proper video for each person. Their new opening video for iMPACT is pretty good so there's no reason why this can't be done.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 23 April 2010, 12:08:46 AM
The entrance videos don't bother me as much as the theme music. All their stuff sounds so cheap.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 23 April 2010, 01:51:05 AM
Indeed other than a few guys themes every other theme song absolutely sucks.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Siva on 24 April 2010, 04:13:00 AM
Anyone think Paul Heyman will join TNA? I'm indifferent, I think he would be serious about it if they give him a head creative role, and if they did TNA would be much better than it is now, but still hasn't he had negative feelings towards TNA?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J.D on 25 April 2010, 01:35:35 PM
Quote from: Siva;40831
Anyone think Paul Heyman will join TNA? I'm indifferent, I think he would be serious about it if they give him a head creative role, and if they did TNA would be much better than it is now, but still hasn't he had negative feelings towards TNA?


Maybe behind the scenes but as much heat as he can draw I don't want to see that face on television.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 25 April 2010, 09:31:04 PM
Not a huge fan of Paul Heyman. I'm interested in seeing what would happen if he was to get a substantial backstage role in TNA though.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 26 April 2010, 11:55:36 PM
I seriously doubt heyman will ever join TNA unless he gets a lot of creative power and i just don't see hogan giving that up and even if he did he wouldn't last long.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 28 April 2010, 03:34:46 AM
.5
.5
HAHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 29 April 2010, 03:51:24 AM
I don't laugh at other misfortune but but it truely is a pathetic rating. when will they learn they are doing something wrong?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 29 April 2010, 03:55:55 AM
They won't, because they will gloat by saying their ratings will have increased 85% next week back to a .9 or so because they won't have the WWE directly head to head with them for both hours.  If it's not back to at least a .8, it's time to get out of Mondays.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 6 May 2010, 08:59:01 PM
Quote
TNAWrestlingNews.com is reporting that TNA could be dipping into the nineties well again as there has been talk of changing the Global Championship currently held by Rob Terry to a "Hardcore" title. Stay tuned.

Suppose a hardcore title would benefit people more than the Global Championship, which TNA seem to have absolutely no idea how to book.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: chappers on 6 May 2010, 11:14:39 PM
They are making too many changes in such a short space of time. They really just need to stick to something, rather then changing up the whole system. There's absolutely no direction whatsoever.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 6 May 2010, 11:39:41 PM
i agree but i miss the hardcore title i wish they bring it back in 24/7 mode.

on a side note i think this past weeks impact was horrible and next weeks looks even worse.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 7 May 2010, 06:07:18 AM
Found this quote on another website as to why TNA has never fully taken off, even when they were doing some things right, and that it stems from using the double entendre of TNA.  I've always thought the use of TNA was really stupid and was just for initial shock value to get some views, but imagine a parent finding out their kid is watching a program called TNA.  This really limits their audience.

Quote from: Jim Cornette
“It’s like starting a company called High Intensity Violence and  wondering why no one wants to watch HIV Wrestling.”
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 11 May 2010, 11:36:45 PM
Quote
[/FONT]In an interview with the  
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 12 May 2010, 03:23:44 AM
you know what annoys me? how they always talk about its about who makes teh most money in TNA. like a lot of the time you will hear tazz and tenay and even a lt of wrestlers say stuff like its about being the champion because you make the most money. and that just makes TNA and everyone in TNA seems like greedy bastards that you just can't like.

in the WWE or ROH or any other wrestling promotion it always seems like you want to be the champion because you want to be the best and because of the passion and it being a dream come true type of deal but in TNA they make it seem like its just to make more money which makes them look like a douchebags IMO.

and the funny thing is they try to portray the WWE as being what they make themselves come off as
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J.D on 13 May 2010, 09:50:56 AM
Quote from: Adampro123;41236
you know what annoys me? how they always talk about its about who makes teh most money in TNA. like a lot of the time you will hear tazz and tenay and even a lt of wrestlers say stuff like its about being the champion because you make the most money. and that just makes TNA and everyone in TNA seems like greedy bastards that you just can't like.
 
in the WWE or ROH or any other wrestling promotion it always seems like you want to be the champion because you want to be the best and because of the passion and it being a dream come true type of deal but in TNA they make it seem like its just to make more money which makes them look like a douchebags IMO.
 
and the funny thing is they try to portray the WWE as being what they make themselves come off as

That is true, the thing is when TNA started everyone saw it as some awesome underground indie wrestling scene that was way cooler than WWE and that the true wrestling fans could like but for the past few years it has just been a cheap version of WWE in which they seem even less devoted to the fans and even more intent on pushing the big names and not the younger talent.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 20 May 2010, 08:11:07 AM
I'm going to make the probably not so bold prediction that TNA does not  exist by January 1, 2011.  Or at least in the same capacity that it is right now with a weekly show on Spike unless they make some major changes to their business model.

I'm not saying this because I might be pro-WWE or anti-TNA, it's just  that they are not being run like any successful business should.  It's  blatantly obvious that they are having serious money issues after this  live/Monday experiment failed miserably.  Not only have they gone back  to a taped Thursday episode, but they are taping a months worth of shows at  the same time!  This forces creative to work so far out into the future  that they are not able to account for any potential injuries over the  course of a month, change something they may not like, or realize that a  feud might not be doing so well in front of a crowd.  The schedule has  been reduced even more than it was before they ever moved to Mondays.  Maybe this saves the talent from the extra expense of flying in to Orlando and staying in a hotel one more night a month, but I can't see how this will have much of an effect.

I read within the last few days that TNA is most profitable during their  house shows as merchandise sales have risen.  While that may be the  case, has it risen enough to sustain the payroll increase to the roster  over the last 12-18 months?  I find that very hard to believe.  Also, wouldn't it make sense to tour Impact to sell more merchandise to new audiences?  I'm not sure if sending cameras and staging equipment around North America would outweigh the benefits of staying on their soundstage in Universal Studios.

Finally, many of the newsboards are commending TNA/Dixie Carter for  wanting to hold on to talent despite needing to make roster cuts because those people wouldn't have any other options  in the current economic climate.  I may flat out sound mean, but why is  this TNA's problem?  They are a business and they will be a sinking ship  if they continue to hold on to most of these salaries.  We all know Vince  McMahon in recent years has begun to assist many former employees who have  hit rough patches by putting them through rehab and such, but he already  has a successful, established business where helping these people won't  hurt the WWE's bottom line.  TNA's unnecessary employees entered the  industry at the wrong time and either they should have saved their money  in case of times like these if they have made a decent living in the past, or they need to find a new line of work like any other person would in a bad market.  This should not be TNA's burden otherwise the whole company will be gone and everyone will be out of a job.

TNA has been like a fat kid at a candy store the last few years.  They show up with their weekly allowance from their parents, then ask for a cash advance because they can't say no to all the different varieties because they want it all.  Well, this week their father said no to the advance, and its time to decide if they want to keep eating or whip themselves into shape.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 20 May 2010, 09:21:43 AM
The problem consists of two things, booking and Hogan. Hogan had the bright idea of bringing this new influx of talent into TNA that he swore were going to help TNA and none of them did anything to garner interest to the product. None of the talent has done anything to dent the ratings, hell the start of RVD's title run got a .06 rating. Your main event consists of AJ Styles and WWE guys and you can't get anyone to watch because A) The booking staff is terrible and B) The main event of iMPACT a few weeks ago was a midcard match on RAW in 2004. Both of which are way past there prime. RVD is so sloppy its not even funny and Hardy is a druggy who doesn't even try anymore it seems. Hes just there to do something before he goes to jail and get his friends a job before he leaves.

Idk. I was going to write more but its 4am and i really do feel like a broken record on the whole situation. I want TNA to sink fast and get this shit over with so i can shit on TNA and its fans.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 20 May 2010, 03:21:31 PM
I've been saying this for a long time. TNA doesn't have the right business model to succeed. When you open a store, you don't put it across from a Wal-Mart and hope for the best, you compete with stores your own size or go into a market where you'd be the only comptition. TNA went after WWE too fast, and didn't built itself on its own merits, but those of people who build them elsewhere, mostly WWE.

While it seems like the TNA roster is loyal, there's going to be a time where they stop getting paid, like that chick who missed the house show because she couldn't pay for her way there. There's going to be a point where the Stings, the Angles, the Joes are going to start saying, fuck this, and there's going to be a point where the paychecks are going to get bounced.

The MOMENT that happens, a lot of these guys are going to crawl back to the WWE. Then TNA will look even stupider than they do now, with the guys they have in their storylines for months will one day show up in WWE.

I long for the moment that Kurt Angle or someone like that shows up on RAW one day and TNA has to scramble to take him out of pre-taped matches and angles on impact.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Awesome on 20 May 2010, 09:07:13 PM
Quote from: JeriPrax;41513
I long for the moment that Kurt Angle or someone like that shows up on RAW one day and TNA has to scramble to take him out of pre-taped matches and angles on impact.


I take it TNA doesn't do the no-compete clauses like WWE does then? If so, I'd love to see something like that happen too :D
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 20 May 2010, 09:21:22 PM
They might, but WWE would probably be willing to pay what ever TNA sues Angle for just to say haha.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 20 May 2010, 10:02:42 PM
Quote from: narcolepsy;41498
Finally, many of the newsboards are commending TNA/Dixie Carter for  wanting to hold on to talent despite needing to make roster cuts because those people wouldn't have any other options  in the current economic climate.  I may flat out sound mean, but why is  this TNA's problem?  They are a business and they will be a sinking ship  if they continue to hold on to most of these salaries.  We all know Vince  McMahon in recent years has begun to assist many former employees who have  hit rough patches by putting them through rehab and such, but he already  has a successful, established business where helping these people won't  hurt the WWE's bottom line.  TNA's unnecessary employees entered the  industry at the wrong time and either they should have saved their money  in case of times like these if they have made a decent living in the past, or they need to find a new line of work like any other person would in a bad market.  This should not be TNA's burden otherwise the whole company will be gone and everyone will be out of a job.
That's one problem I have with Dixie, she seems far too nice and far too close to the fans. As i've said time and time again about her she just seems like a mark as opposed to a leader. Can you imagine Vince being on twitter telling people he's just watched an amazing match, or was impressed by someone in their tryout match or that someone has just signed a contract extension. It's admirable she wants to be in direct touch with the fans and listen to their views but it's a dangerous situation as it's almost as if the fans are dictating to her and I think the best case of this was when she was bombarded to sign either Shannon Moore or The Young Bucks.

As far as releasing the talent goes, I read a few pieces today which I will comment on after them

Quote
[/FONT]-- TNA is reportedly going through a lot of  cost-cutting measures although nothing has been specifically said other  than they are happening. Only one person has been let go at this point,  ring announcer David Penzer, and it wasn't cost-cutting as much as just  him having heat.

What is known is that those close to TNA president Dixie Carter  recommended an extensive list of talent
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 21 May 2010, 03:14:43 AM
Quote from: Awesome;41541
Quote from: JeriPrax;41513
I long for the moment that Kurt Angle or someone like that shows up on RAW one day and TNA has to scramble to take him out of pre-taped matches and angles on impact.

I take it TNA doesn't do the no-compete clauses like WWE does then? If so, I'd love to see something like that happen too :D

I'm sure they have something in their contracts but WWE has more lawyers than TNA has overpaid old main eventers. If they can't get around the legalities, they'll just pay them off like Leo said. If I were WWE I would do it.

As for what Dale said in regards to Dixie's connection to the fans, I'm inclined to agree with him because all the points he makes are solid, but at the same time, it works for Dana White, does it not? Obviously the big issue is the fact that Mr. McMahon is a character as well as a real businessperson , but still, it's an interesting discussion.

I don't really think Dixie tweeting is an issue, if anything that creates fan. Obviously she can't run a business to save her life though, and that's the difference between her and Vince. Vince will fire you if you look at him funny. If you were to spit in Dixie's coffee, she'd probably still drink it so that she wouldn't offend your saliva.

SHE'S the problem with TNA, Hogan hogging air time is minor compared to the mismanagement of Dixie Carter.

This whole thing reminds me of what's going on with the NHL right now. There's a russian league, the KHL, that a lot of players are leaving for because they're offering more money and star roles (sound familiar?) but it's funded by some shady oil businesses that are tired for paying for teams that don't make money, so a lot of players aren't making close to what they're contracts state if anything. They're saying that in 1 or 2 years, most of the guys who left and those who never came will be back in the NHL.

This is what is going to happen to TNA. People who don't care as much about the product or company will jump at the chance to return to the WWE.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 29 June 2010, 08:46:55 AM
Victory Road is shaping up to be pretty good it seems

MCMG vs BeerMoney has happened before and it's been a great match before. bad part about the last one they had on PPV was the ending. if TNA gives them a good clean ending then we could have a MOTYC. especially if the guns win when it comes tome :D

Williams vs Kendrick was Really good last month and this months actually has a good build yet i don't really like the Ultimate X/Submission Stipulation i still think it can be anotherreally good match.

Angle vs The Pope Should be another really good  match, could be great just depends on if Pope is rusty or not but then again who better to be in there with than angle? I know angle will most likely win because i don't expect him to lose a match until he gets to number 1 and faces RVD at Bound for glory.

Speaking of RVD...

RVD vs Abyss vs Anderson vs Jeff i think could be a really good match. though my doubts lie in the ending of the match. TNA needs to stop having run ins in main events and need to stop having anticlimactic endings especially on main events.

that means if you're gonna do a ECW invasion do it in a 3D vs Ink Inc match aand not in the main event.

Flair vs Lethal won't be that good but it hopefully it won't last too long and i think its nice seeing the rise of Lethal. i just think he wins a bit too much.

I'm Assuming we will get AJ vs Kaz which is a MOTYC on paper. can't wait to see this match if it happens and i hope its booked right.

Morgan vs Hernandez I dunno about but i don't think it will hurt the quality of the show. i will be glad when these guys can move on to different things though.

I don't know if they will do a Sting vs JJ but im hoping they won't. and 3D vs Ink Inc if done with the ECW invasion could be pretty decent especially if heyman is involved. then there's the knockouts which i assume will be Love vs Rain but i'll just skip it anyways...might watch the entrances depending on my mood lol.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 6 July 2010, 07:07:04 PM
(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg31.imageshack.us%2Fimg31%2F4125%2F1278385172135.jpg&hash=94fc54dd020f0d8ce3cf1c06058b04595370d09f)
(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg697.imageshack.us%2Fimg697%2F4744%2F1278388965799.jpg&hash=d8399ea38f2f2d83688e510b2b0adec47b6f5b0f)

Stole from another site. Recent house show photos and good lord does he look terrible,
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 6 July 2010, 07:25:04 PM
It looks like he took the move to the Heavyweight division too literal.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 6 July 2010, 10:35:12 PM
And a few weeks ago we had that 1 guy here saying Jeff hardy was in good shape. REALLY? come on the guy is in TNA and doesn't give a fuck and knows he can get away with it.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Awesome on 6 July 2010, 11:29:52 PM
Quote from: Adampro123;42886
And a few weeks ago we had that 1 guy here saying Jeff hardy was in good shape. REALLY? come on the guy is in TNA and doesn't give a fuck and knows he can get away with it.


QFT.

When I first saw that picture, I assumed it was supposed to be a picture of a fan trying to imitate Jeff O_o
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 9 July 2010, 01:00:03 AM
though its not expected for TNA Ratings to be good i think they will take a substantial hit tonight at least in the first hour with the Lebron James Decision show because that has gotten absolutely huge at this point.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 10 July 2010, 04:02:58 AM
See what happens when you kick drugs kids.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 20 July 2010, 09:01:25 PM
Quote from: f4wonline.com
It is believed that TNA Wrestling's May and June pay-per-view events,  Sacrifice and Slammiversary, drew approximately 8,000  buys apiece. The gross sum per event would total to approximately  $111,000 for the company, though that is before the expense of running a  live pay-per-view event is factored in.

 By comparison, TNA drew in the neighborhood of 25,000 to 30,000  pay-per-view buys when iMPACT! was airing at 11 p.m. on  Saturday nights. And when World Championship Wrestling was on its death  bed, the company was still garnering approximately 40,000 buys per  pay-per-view.

 To draw another comparison, illegal live streams of TNA Wrestling  pay-per-view events are nowhere near as popular as that of World  Wrestling Entertainment and UFC. According to a source in monitoring,  there are usually thirty to fifty unique live streams for wrestling  pay-per-view events with an average of 1,000 viewers per stream prior to  its termination. For last week's Victory Road pay-per-view,  there were only five streams across the major live streaming sites
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 20 July 2010, 09:57:37 PM
PPV Buys are down all around and i would suspect them to keep dropping. we are living in a new age from years passed. all we gotta do now is go online and find out the results or wait the next day and download a torrent. with that said you would think TNA would be doing at least a little better than they currently are.but with horrible marketing and questionable booking and a lot of guys that just aren't fresh anymore that's what you get.

Fact of the matter is there PPV usually are let downs and there main events are usually anticlimactic because RVD Doesn't seem to know how to make a match end in a good way.if i normally bought PPVs i sure know i wouldn't be ordering any in the last few months (though some has been good and had good cards)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 21 July 2010, 04:28:56 AM
Quote from: Adampro123;43125
PPV Buys are down all around and i would suspect them to keep dropping. we are living in a new age from years passed. all we gotta do now is go online and find out the results or wait the next day and download a torrent. with that said you would think TNA would be doing at least a little better than they currently are.but with horrible marketing and questionable booking and a lot of guys that just aren't fresh anymore that's what you get.
I would have to look properly but I could of swore several of the E's PPV's were actually up on the previous year due to them rebranding them with the gimmicks and what not.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 21 July 2010, 05:32:06 AM
Quote from: MickieFan;43136
Quote from: Adampro123;43125
PPV Buys are down all around and i would suspect them to keep dropping. we are living in a new age from years passed. all we gotta do now is go online and find out the results or wait the next day and download a torrent. with that said you would think TNA would be doing at least a little better than they currently are.but with horrible marketing and questionable booking and a lot of guys that just aren't fresh anymore that's what you get.
I would have to look properly but I could of swore several of the E's PPV's were actually up on the previous year due to them rebranding them with the gimmicks and what not.

Good news for them, though i always thought PPV buys were down from years passed.

To WWE credit they have gone after an audience of kids and the casual grown up who probably don't now about streams and torrents. TNA's fanbase is pretty much people of the internet. and sady not many at that.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 26 July 2010, 10:59:42 PM
Quote from: nodq.com
According to prowrestling.net, there are plans to tape a special edition  of TNA Impact the night after the Hardcore Justice PPV.

Essentially, the idea is that it will be a "free PPV" event. The  working title is "The Whole Fn' Show" and all the matches will be  PPV-quality with no storylines/skits.

Why buy the PPV when you can catch it all on Spike a couple days later? Nice business plan, TNA.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 26 July 2010, 11:31:42 PM
Simply mindblowing. Guessing this is to makeup for presumably no TNA Originals being on the PPV?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 27 July 2010, 09:26:18 PM
I'm guessing this will be what blows off all of the non ECW feuds like the final match in the BM vs MCMG series. glad they're doing this i hope it goes well.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Awesome on 11 August 2010, 11:44:36 PM
http://twitter.com/realHulk_Hogan

Despite the name, they're not really Hulk Hogan - though they did manage to trick Bubba The Love Sponge and Eric Bischoff into believing they were and promoting the new account at first - but they're now saying that they are a TNA wrestler that isn't getting listened to so they hope they will this way.

EDIT: They're saying that TNA is investigating the account now, so they're now at http://twitter.com/TNAnonymous
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 12 August 2010, 12:37:16 AM
I'll tell you the guy is very convincing (not the hogan stuff, I didn't buy that) but the stuff after. It's probably still fake but he does a pretty good job of stirring the pot, who ever it is. That was amusing lol. The best is Bubba the Douche falling for it :lol

Edit:


Quote
No I am not on the House Show loop right now, not till September. And that's part of the problem, that's large income lost.


If this guy is for real, then that should cut the field down to at most a few.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Awesome on 12 August 2010, 09:13:11 PM
Now back on the Hogan Twitter, they're saying that they're Christopher Daniels.

EDIT: Christopher Daniels has confirmed on his own Twitter that it's a lie as it's not him.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 13 August 2010, 01:52:12 AM
Oh well, it was fun while it lasted.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 14 August 2010, 12:43:17 AM
So from watching the ECW PPV i think TNA SHould hire 4 of there wrestlers to help TNA's X-Division.

Kid Kash
too clod scorpio
Nunzio
Tony Mamaluke

from what i seen all those guys could still go and the X-D is lacking right now. from watching impact it looks like they may at least be hiring nunzio and mamaluke. but no sight of kash and scorpio.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 17 August 2010, 11:25:14 AM
I've always had a soft spot for Kid Kash, so I'd love for him to start working with TNA again.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 19 August 2010, 05:50:48 PM
Quote
FACTS HURT!

On the heels of the big “youth push” in WWE during the past several weeks, here are some facts from this week in the business:

“Raw's demographic ratings among males 18-34 and 18-49 were the lowest in seven weeks.”

“Raw scored a 1.86 rating among males 18-34, which was down from a 2.03 rating last week.”

And during this months conference call to investors Vince McMahon admitted that:

"Basically, we had a lousy quarter," and then when on to pin the loss of Shawn Michaels, Batista, Triple H, and Undertaker (all 40 + years old) as the reason for the hit to PPV and live event revenue.

Now one could suggest that McMahon is insane enough to be intentionally misleading Wall Street with excuses that are not substantiated by financials that wouldn’t hold up under either SEC or Sarbanes Oxley Act 404 scrutiny, or maybe that he has no idea what he’s talking about despite the massive success of his business model.

Or one could recognize the direct connect between what TV ratings, PPV buy rates, and ticket sales have proven time and time again, as well as what legitimate focus groups conducted by credible media companies in the business of such have clearly identified: the TV audience (including 18-34 males) rate with ESTABLISHED (and yes older) stars!

Admittedly, these facts are kind of dry compared to the subjective opinion of those with their own agenda or the inflamed rhetoric that appeals to those perpetually pre-pubescent, parasitic internet “experts” who neither have any legitimate experience or success as executives in the television or wrestling industry, and the rants of the terminally irrelevant trying desperately to hold on to their last 200 fans.

But they are facts non-the-less.

In my opinion Vince Russo, Dixie Carter and the team at TNA have done a great job of utilizing veteran stars to help elevate some of the young emerging talent in TNA and at the same time gaining awareness and credibility within the media industry.

That’s just my opinion. And my opinion is backed up by facts.

OUCH!

Sorry.

Really, Eric? What are TNA's ratings like? Where are those facts?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 19 August 2010, 05:54:51 PM
Quote
Honky Tonk Man responds to Eric Bischoffs comments on WWE‏

Eric Bischoff calls the WWE youth movement a flop!? My what a short  memory you have Eric. In 2000 you and Vince Russo called anyone over 35  (with the exception of Hogan) a non draw as you killed WCW. Ouch!

My reply is simple, if no one is watching WWE, how in the hell do they  draw 75,000 people to Mania and demolish TNA in the ratings each week.  WWE must be doing something right!

You bash the internet wrestling community yet post comments directly  aimed at them and the sites you obviously visit. Don’t be a mark for  yourself Eric!

If wrestling fans, reporters or anyone else want to talk TNA, WWE, ROH  or any other wrestling show, it’s their right to do so. It’s called free  speech.

source: gerweck.net
Honky sets him straight.
[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 19 August 2010, 08:33:43 PM
Cide gone, Becky Bayless in.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 20 August 2010, 01:14:38 AM
I Don't have a problem with most of what he said, you can't really argue with facts (though some seem to like to) what i do take issue with is that he needs to look his self in the mirror.

how about these facts?

the only 3 original TNA guys to become TNA Champion are AJ,Joe and Abyss.

Abyss won the title Via DQ and his run only lasted a month.

Joe is currently suspended for being upset when i feel he was in the right because of the time limit draw thing with hardy.

I Feel AJ's run ended out of nowhere and was too soon. also he's your current MID CARD champion.

and look at the main guys you're pushing now.

RVD
EV.20
Abyss
Jeff Hardy
Ken Anderson
Kurt Angle

Where's the youth in that?  really whats the avg age of those guys put together? who's the youngest of those guys? which one of those guys hasn't been in the WWE ? Abyss? he's fat and no one really cares about him.

No one sems to understand anything when it comes to booking. we want young wrestlers to be pushed that are good wrestlers. WWE Pushes young wrestlers before they are good wrestlers and TNA waits to push the young good wrestlers when they are past there prime and aren't as good anymore and most the time only if they came from WWE.

then as stated above he doesn't seem to say anything about TNA's Ratings.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 20 August 2010, 03:36:58 AM
The problem I had with what he said is that pointing out the weaknesses in WWE's ratings and buyrates is useless. Does he think that people are going to watch TNA because he pointed out that no one watched WWE? WWE isn't losing ratings because they're pushing young guys, they're losing ratings because they care more about making profits and ratings are no longer a proper gauge of how much money a company makes, and they're losing ratings because wrestling in general isn't the business it used to be.

But what does this accomplish for TNA, other than ATTEMPTING to take attention away from their own deficiencies? Totally useless.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: chappers on 20 August 2010, 04:19:09 AM
The only demographic he looked at is for adults, which isn't the audience WWE is mainly targeting. He makes a couple decent points, but then he backs it up with the usual trite which is clearly made to make TNA look like the better company, boring. I find it funny how he is trying to claim that TNA has won, yet even with a dip in ratings, WWE still trump TNA. Hell I wouldn't be surprised if the number of 18-34 year olds completely trumped TNA's total ratings. Pathetic that Bischoff views this as a victory, it doesn't even have anything to do with TNA!
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 20 August 2010, 04:19:59 AM
Exactly. Bichoff needs to be worrying more about getting good publicity out there for TNA and trying to get the name out there more in different ways than just talking to the IWC bad about WWE that's really not any way to gain fans because if they're reading it they probably already know about TNA.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 21 August 2010, 03:06:46 AM
This past week's RAW was the most watched show in the history of the network that shows it on Canada. Just sayin' Eric.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 21 August 2010, 04:26:49 AM
To be fair, its Canada...
If it wasn't for Stacey Farber Canada would be irrelevant.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 21 August 2010, 05:24:24 AM
If it wasn't for Prax Canada would be Irrelevant. (Y)

...well him, Petey Williams, Jericho, Robert Roode, Christian, Edge, THD, and Keanu Reeves 8-)

On a side TNA Related note Samoa Joe will be returning next Week on Impact according to ReACTION last week. I'm wondering where things will go from here for him, he floated around for a while and seemed to star getting pushed again right before he got suspended.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 21 August 2010, 05:05:24 PM
Jim Carrey, William Shatner, Pamela Anderson, Nickelback, Celine Dion, James Cameron...


Just to name a few :ace
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 21 August 2010, 11:11:29 PM
Mentioning William Shatner and Celine Dion just brought Canada 10 steps down from where it was.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 22 August 2010, 01:50:50 AM
Quote from: Adampro123;43750
Mentioning William Shatner and Celine Dion just brought Canada 10 steps down from where it was.


William Shatner is fucking amazing. You take it back right now or else I'm going to ban you. :prax
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 22 August 2010, 04:41:28 AM
Those names aren't Stacey Farber.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 30 August 2010, 05:02:32 PM
Remember the big surprise JJ was tweeting about, with the pictures as clues?

Quote
- You may remember Jeff Jarrett teasing something big on Twitter last  month. What he was talking about is an appearance by his daughter  Jaclyn in Taylor Swift
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 30 August 2010, 10:10:08 PM
Wow is that really it? did jeff say that was it? if so that's retarded why tease that? who of your wrestling fans which are the only people that follow you mainly will give a damn?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Awesome on 31 August 2010, 06:20:20 PM
Good for the kids I guess, but Adam speaks the truth, not many people following him will care.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 3 September 2010, 11:52:51 PM
Quote
As previously noted, TNA Impact will not air on Spike TV next week. The show, which would have aired on Thursday, September 9th, will be replaced by a special airing of "Gangland."

TNA will counter by holding a special online "Bound For Glory" related show on Sept. 9.

Impact will return to its' usual timeslot the following Thursday, September 16.

I know that I shouldn't make fun since RAW used to occasionally get preempted for a frigging dog show, but as far as I know Gangland is a show that only has repeats on Spike TV... so that's kind of weird that Spike would preempt essentially their flagship show for a rerun...
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 4 September 2010, 06:04:00 AM
Yeah what's the reasoning behind this? why not show it on another night or show impact on another night?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 8 September 2010, 10:59:20 AM
Its the opening week of the NFL and if I remember correctly, the first game of the season is a Thursday night game (Vikings @ New Orleans) that would be going head to head with iMPACT, and since its likely to get bigger ratings being the first game of the season, that's probably why they chose to put something on where the ratings have no meaning
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 8 September 2010, 03:03:10 PM
I don't see that as a legitimate reason for not having a show though. They're still filming something for online so it's not like they're saving money. WWE is stacking their show because of the NFL.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 8 September 2010, 05:43:20 PM
Quote from: P-Truth;44110
I don't see that as a legitimate reason for not having a show though. They're still filming something for online so it's not like they're saving money. WWE is stacking their show because of the NFL.
I didn't say it was a good reason for not having a show, just that is the only logical reason I can think of.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 10 September 2010, 10:35:28 PM
Quote
Credit: F4WOnline.com

Last night's NFL season opener featuring Minnesota Vikings vs. New  Orleans Saints did a 17.7 rating and 28 share on the overnights.

If this number holds up, it will be the highest rated opening game of the season in NFL history.

I Guess it kind of makes sense. but they could have always moved this weeks episode to another night.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 11 September 2010, 03:48:25 AM
If you want to know why TNA sucks you just need to look at the last PPV. It was a pretty damn awesome PPV until the last two matches, first off. Anderson/Dinero isn't a main event match yet. And the fact that it was showed that TNA was unsure of the finish for Angle/Hardy and they didn't want to send the fans home pissed off. Second, a fucking time limit on a tournament match? Who the fuck thought of that. That would be like the NFL or the World Cup just ending the game after regulation just and just going "Oh well time ran out."
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 11 September 2010, 08:50:41 AM
Quote from: THE Lioncock;44154
If you want to know why TNA sucks you just need to look at the last PPV. It was a pretty damn awesome PPV until the last two matches, first off. Anderson/Dinero isn't a main event match yet. And the fact that it was showed that TNA was unsure of the finish for Angle/Hardy and they didn't want to send the fans home pissed off. Second, a fucking time limit on a tournament match? Who the fuck thought of that. That would be like the NFL or the World Cup just ending the game after regulation just and just going "Oh well time ran out."
You do realise they give them 2 overtimes and it ended as a draw, they didn't just end at the time limit.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 11 September 2010, 09:11:33 AM
Quote from: Gorsty;44155
Quote from: THE Lioncock;44154
If you want to know why TNA sucks you just need to look at the last PPV. It was a pretty damn awesome PPV until the last two matches, first off. Anderson/Dinero isn't a main event match yet. And the fact that it was showed that TNA was unsure of the finish for Angle/Hardy and they didn't want to send the fans home pissed off. Second, a fucking time limit on a tournament match? Who the fuck thought of that. That would be like the NFL or the World Cup just ending the game after regulation just and just going "Oh well time ran out."
You do realise they give them 2 overtimes and it ended as a draw, they didn't just end at the time limit.

Yeah i think that part of it made sense. if you go back there was a wcw PPV that ran out of time and no one that ordered the ppv got to see the main event. i know this was scripted but i think they kind of played off the PPV Time running out that's why they could only do so much.

Then if you look at it the other way and say they stopped Because angle was bleeding and coulnd't go on or so said the trainers you can't give the match to hardy because right before that angle had him in the ankle lock (twice i think) and hardy wasn't going anywhere and if the match kept going angle should have won.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: WeedMan420 on 11 September 2010, 12:39:21 PM
It was a fantastic match and it left you all buzzing about it. Therefore TNA did their part..disagree if you want but the truth is as the truth is..
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Gorsty on 11 September 2010, 06:26:01 PM
Quote from: Adampro123;44156
Quote from: Gorsty;44155
Quote from: THE Lioncock;44154
If you want to know why TNA sucks you just need to look at the last PPV. It was a pretty damn awesome PPV until the last two matches, first off. Anderson/Dinero isn't a main event match yet. And the fact that it was showed that TNA was unsure of the finish for Angle/Hardy and they didn't want to send the fans home pissed off. Second, a fucking time limit on a tournament match? Who the fuck thought of that. That would be like the NFL or the World Cup just ending the game after regulation just and just going "Oh well time ran out."
You do realise they give them 2 overtimes and it ended as a draw, they didn't just end at the time limit.

Yeah i think that part of it made sense. if you go back there was a wcw PPV that ran out of time and no one that ordered the ppv got to see the main event. i know this was scripted but i think they kind of played off the PPV Time running out that's why they could only do so much.

Then if you look at it the other way and say they stopped Because angle was bleeding and coulnd't go on or so said the trainers you can't give the match to hardy because right before that angle had him in the ankle lock (twice i think) and hardy wasn't going anywhere and if the match kept going angle should have won.
I agree shoot style, Angle would have won, but whereas in the UFC a fight would go to a judges decision, thats not an option in pro-wrestling so I think the way they did it was fine. Also, one of the comments made about the world cup and games ending in a draw, they did, England drew against both the US and Algeria, they both ended after 90 minutes, and it really depends on the tournament, in the FA cup here in England if there is a draw in the stages leading upto the quarter finals they have a replay, something I believe TNA are doing on iMPACT in a no-time limit match.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 23 September 2010, 01:08:21 AM
Quote
According to a report on diva-dirt.com, former WWE Diva Mickie James has  either signed or is expected to sign a contract with TNA Wrestling  today. Word has been going around that James would finalize a deal with  the company today.

In a potentially related note, TNA Wrestling is going to have an all-Knockouts PPV on October 1st.

Stay tuned for updates!

Looks like dale may be getting a reason to justify his name again rather than being a mickiefan with no mickie.lol.

It will be good to see her again she got stale in WWE but was always one of the better wrestlers.

A All Female PPV though? seriously who is gonna order that? no wrestling fan and the ones who watch it for hotness would probably rather much order a porn for cheaper. or i dunno go on the internet?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 23 September 2010, 02:18:22 AM
Been a long time coming has this. Ex-WWE maybe but has plenty of upside for the respective decision so it's only a win-win for me.

As far as the KO PPV goes, I read it was more of a best of or something along those lines and for $10 it's worth them giving it a go giving that they're the biggest draws.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 24 September 2010, 12:29:18 AM
As I've said before, I would be excited for Mickie James coming to TNA if it happened a couple of years back. I really have no interest in seeing her vs. Lacey Von Erich, Velvet Sky or whatever useless worker they put in the ring with her. I'm sure she'll have a couple of decent encounters with Angelina Love or whatever - but she'll be such an obvious standout that the matches will all feel one sided in my eyes. That's what made the Kong/Kim series so interesting, they could both go back and forth and were staples of the division. Could I seriously buy Velvet Sky (just for arguments sake, I know she's face now) going toe to toe with Mickie James?

Also, The Amazing Red captured the X-Division Championship from Jay Lethal at the Hammerstein Ballroom in one of the weirdest moves ever. Wouldn't mind a match between the two at BFG.

(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsphotos.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ak-snc4%2Fhs022.snc4%2F33473_437269066025_31695961025_5288862_4580387_n.jpg&hash=8becb510daaa73a29c54a2a4b94c82cd7d0c0e6f)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 24 September 2010, 02:22:15 AM
Was Just about to post this. I'm guessing we could have a triple threat or fatal 4 way.

Lethal,Red,Williams and a Mystery guy Helms,Benjamin,Carlito,Yang also it still baffles me why TNA hasn't tried to sign Jack Evans or Pac for the X-D.

Or maybe add Hernandez? he can High Fly and its not like he's doing anything right now.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 24 September 2010, 02:32:23 AM
Never been a huge fan of Jack Evans, tbh.

You know who I always thought should be in the X-Division? Kurt Angle. Just like, 6 months of him having matches with Lethal, Red, Williams and co would be off the charts. I remember loving his match with Kazarian from Slammiversary, so more of that will be right up my street.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 24 September 2010, 02:41:00 AM
Hernandez is where he deserves to be, off of TV. Guessing that stint down in Mexico to build his star power ala Rey didn't turn out too well.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 24 September 2010, 02:42:56 AM
He's still working down in Mexico, so he's not being left off TV because they're not happy with him.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 24 September 2010, 03:52:04 AM
Yeah I'm not too high on Hernandez either,Just would be something for him and add another Element to the match

Weather you're a fan of Evans or not i think he would put a kick in the X-Division and it would be nice to have some fresh faces in there which is one of the things that made the X-D great when it was Great.

I Like the Idea about Angle, only problem is he would probably win all his matches there and everything would be predictable...kn dof like his current storyline that's pretty good so i guess it would be ok.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 24 September 2010, 10:04:30 PM
Quote
If you saw Impact last night, you might have been wondering why Ric Flair chugged a Smirnoff Ice at the end of his promo segment with Fortune.  Well, it turns out to be a new drinking game, sometimes called "Bros Icing Bros" in which a person is handed a Smirnoff Ice, anytime, anyplace, and must immediately chug it on the spot.  



(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.celebrityodor.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fcelebrities%2Fother%2F2010%2Fjanuary%2Ffamous_facepalms%2Ffamous_facepalm_11.jpg&hash=a9ff4532b8964511480a6170b1b2923f47316e5e)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 24 September 2010, 10:59:20 PM
Well ok.... that was clearly explained last night as far as i can remember.... seemed like they were just trying to show what kind of guys those guys were.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 25 September 2010, 05:25:46 PM
Quote
Diva Dirt - Ring of Honor and SHIMMER star, Sara Del Rey, revealed in an appearance on In Your Head last night that TNA was not interested in signing her and told her she needed
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 25 September 2010, 11:06:03 PM
Yeah that's just wrong. Del Rey is the best female wrestler i have seen and any company would be lucky to have her.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 26 September 2010, 10:15:24 AM
Quote
TNA Wrestling FB -  BREAKING NEWS: Jay Lethal defeated The Amazing Red on Saturday night at the TNA Live Event in Rahway, New Jersey to regain the X Division Championship!

Well that was worth the switch haha.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 26 September 2010, 10:37:38 AM
I guess Red won it in New York his hometown and Lethal won it back in New Jersey his Home town. i hope to see this feud boil over to TV.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 11 October 2010, 10:18:28 PM
Credit: nodq.com

June 17th- Abyss chokeslams Hardy off of the stage and through a table

June 24th- Abyss tells Hogan "they" are coming and then chokes him  while shoving hogans ring down his throat. Later on Hogan hits Abyss  with a chair

July 1st- Hogan and Abyss brawl. Hardy makes the save by giving  Abyss the twist of fate and a senton. Later Abyss and Hardy have a match  full of hatred induced violence.

July 8th- Hardy and Mr. Anderson double team Abyss and hit him with a chair

Aug 19th- Hardy and Abyss have a nearly 5 minute backstage brawl

Oct 7th- Abyss eliminates Jarrett and Hardy from a battle royal costing them "100,000 dollars"

Oct 10th- SWERVE!!!!
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 11 October 2010, 10:23:48 PM
I'm guessing Hardy went heel and aligned with Abyss? :P
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 11 October 2010, 11:05:27 PM
I didn't actually watch the show, but from my understanding Eric Bischoff, Hulk Hogan, Abyss, Jeff Jarrett, and Jeff Hardy = THEY...if I'm wrong, don't bother correcting me because it still won't make sense.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 11 October 2010, 11:15:03 PM
That's correct. Believe me, i've been watching for weeks and have no idea how this is going to make sense.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 11 October 2010, 11:31:04 PM
So what does TNA have now? Like 20 factions? I didn't think it was possible, but this shit might actually be worse than WCW.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 12 October 2010, 12:13:34 PM
Yeah and what does that group have in common? it doesn't make sense at all. i don't care much about what happened in the past because they could just say it was all apart if there plan...but what i care about is why? and what is there reasoning? hell hogan and bichoff is already in charge. its not logical and its just random and stupid. it's TNA.

with that said im looking forward to Impact this week and it does make me want to watch to see where this goes though i have very little faith it will go in a good way.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 25 October 2010, 03:34:25 PM
Team 3D have signed multi year contract extensions with TNA, which of course leads to dirtsheet BS.

Quote
Sources within TNA Wrestling are revealing that there has been a lot of "head-shaking" going on about TNA President Dixie Carter re-signing Team 3D to new contracts. Many people in the company feel that while both Brother Ray and Brother Devon are both popular backstage, they feel that there is no money to be made when it comes to bringing them back to TNA, whether they remain a tag team or become singles competitors. One TNA source had the following to say...

"They shouldn't have been re-signed. No one gets it."

Furthermore, a good number of TNA management did not want Team 3D re-signed to new contracts, but Dixie is being reported as the one who "really wanted to bring the duo back".


They aren't the best signing in the world, but the idea of Dixie having heat for keeping them with TNA just seems ridiculous to me.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 25 October 2010, 06:01:16 PM
There's no need to resign them though. They've done everything they can possibly do bar a singles run which is just gonna fall flat on it's face so bad. Dixie is a stupid mark.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 29 October 2010, 12:06:10 AM
Ladies and gentlemen, live from Orlando, Florida the TNA World Heavyweight Champion here to speak about bullying: Jeff Hardy!

(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tnawrestling.com%2Fmedia%2Fk2%2Fitems%2Fcache%2F8656a6058012a14c766868d73aad133b_M.jpg&hash=34d33b9ccd00906f30bf4da26b6cf4b3794a37f7)
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 29 October 2010, 03:02:04 AM
LMAO. really Jeff? You're a bad guy now and do you have to have the paint on your face?

I Agree about Team 3D, there's nothing left for them to do in TNA and no one wants to see a singles run (though i think brother ray might make one work to an extent) i would actually like to see them in WWE for one last run and try to help out the WWE tag team division.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 29 October 2010, 03:18:36 AM
No joke he showed up like that on a national morning news show. The kid in the corner was being bullied at school and stood up for himself. He said Hardy was his hero and Hardy was live via satellite looking like that.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 29 October 2010, 03:31:08 AM
So he not only looked like an idiot and made TNA and wrestling look trashy but he had to wake up early and prepare himself and do all the face paint....INT HE MORNING?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 29 October 2010, 03:31:59 AM
He looks like the Joker's hipster cousin.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 29 October 2010, 03:47:18 AM
Quote from: THE Lioncock;44998
Ladies and gentlemen, live from Orlando, Florida the TNA World Heavyweight Champion here to speak about bullying: Jeff Hardy!

(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tnawrestling.com%2Fmedia%2Fk2%2Fitems%2Fcache%2F8656a6058012a14c766868d73aad133b_M.jpg&hash=34d33b9ccd00906f30bf4da26b6cf4b3794a37f7)



Eh, why so serious?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 29 October 2010, 08:17:09 AM
I love Jeff Hardy but what a fucking douche.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 29 October 2010, 03:18:26 PM
Quote from: Player Uno;45027
I love Jeff Hardy but what a fucking douche.


Well at least we agree that at least one of the Hardys is a douche :lol
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 2 November 2010, 02:10:17 AM
Quote
Via his twitter account, former WWE star Ken Doane (Kenny Dykstra in WWE) announced the following:

"nov 8th and 9th i will not be going for my "tryout" in orlando. no offense to any1 but im not comfortable paying my own flights and working for free. that is all. i dont need a job that bad. if WWE calls i'll go back or if TNA offers something decent. otherwise im absolutely happy where i am in life."


LOL

What i don't get is why TNA signs trash like Orlando Jordan and signed the nasty boys earlier this year and wants this guy and people like that but they have still yet to get Shelton Benjamin and shockingly Greg Helms (who might be matts sidekick when he comes in like shannon was jeff's hell they could bring back WGTT for there already good tag division.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 2 November 2010, 02:28:48 AM
Wasn't this the guy who a while back was begging for a TNA tryout saying he was the hottest free agent?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 2 November 2010, 11:43:39 AM
Doane is shit, keep him away from any company with TV plz.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Fluttershy on 2 November 2010, 04:44:28 PM
Deep down Kenny is wishing the WWE will resign him. Sadly his wrestling has gotten pretty bad since leaving the WWE so it's not a big los for TNA.

But something I don't understand don't you have to tryout in order to get  called back to get paid. No one is allowed to work for free it's illegal :huh
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 2 November 2010, 04:53:54 PM
I figured he just meant he didn't want to pay for his flight and accomodation to Orlando, work a tryout match or two and not have a concrete offer in place.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 2 November 2010, 08:01:23 PM
Seems sort of counter productive to have jobless people pay for transportation for a tryout when you can't accommodate them at all... not the way I would do business even if I didn't have much of it.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 3 November 2010, 10:09:32 PM
Quote
In an interview with fanhouse.com, Mr. Anderson has revealed TNA has banned chair shots to the head.

"TNA has absolutely thrown down the gauntlet and said no more unprotected chair shots... And every time there is a chair involved in the ring, the agents will come up and say please make sure for me that you are not going to ... that you're going to put your hand up. Please tell me you're going to put your hand up or it's going to be a back shot or something like that."

Anderson, who is currently out of action due to an errant chair shot from Jeff Hardy, reminded everyone that incident was an accident.

"The chair shot that I received from Jeff Hardy was not intended to hit the back of my head. I heard through the grapevine that there were some people who were concerned about that. That was an accident and, you know what, in our business, accidents are going to happen."


About fucking time is all I can say.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 3 November 2010, 10:14:00 PM
I'm still picturing those dickhead fans who they interviewed before the Jan 4th show where they were saying they watched TNA for the unprotected chair shots. I hope they tone the blood down a tad bit too.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 4 November 2010, 04:27:52 AM
Was about to mention the blood too... WWE takes it overboard by actually stopping matches to clean people up, but TNA is the other extreme... I'm so over blood in wrestling.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 4 November 2010, 06:59:33 AM
I could care less about blood. i just want good wrestling matches and good storylines. if blood happens it happens and it should just be left at that.

Chair shots to the head being banned is a good thing. but thinking about chair shots being banned makes me wonder how long it will be before things like DDT's and kicks to the head are banned., i mean chair shots are banned to help prevent concussions and im sure other blows to the head cpuld very well easily cause as much damage as chair shots.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: WeedMan420 on 4 November 2010, 09:31:25 PM
This is fuckin gay. I watch TNA because to me, it had what I liked (head chairshots, blood, women in skimpy clothing, and the ability to say ASS) so now everytime we see a chair, it's going to be a shit back shot? ooooo that's entertaining, all the chair shots are given to people bent over..
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 4 November 2010, 09:58:29 PM
Quote from: WeedMan420;45200
This is fuckin gay. I watch TNA because to me, it had what I liked (head chairshots, blood, women in skimpy clothing, and the ability to say ASS) so now everytime we see a chair, it's going to be a shit back shot? ooooo that's entertaining, all the chair shots are given to people bent over..


You're fucking gay and a fucking idiot at that. If you're interested in people getting hurt, go and watch a movie so you can live out your ridiculous little fantasies. Chair shots to the head are not an appeal, they're dangerous and unnecessary. You'd rather see someone damage their health for your entertainment than have them protected? Blood also isn't necessary in wrestling, not all the time anyway. To say that it's an appeal for you, is fucking ridiculous. Women in skimpy clothing? Watch porn if that's all you're concerned about. Besides, the women of wrestling wear less clothing than most females in the popular media so you're point is void. And the ability to say ass? The only ass here is you.

It's fans like you, that make the wrestling business a joke.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 4 November 2010, 10:40:49 PM
I'm sure they won't stop the skimpy clothing and the adult themes that TNA has, the reason TNA has jumped on this bandwagon is because everyone is talking about concussions in the media, hell TNA even did a storyline about it last week with matt morgan.

I'm not gonna go all crazy on you because i understand your point, you watch TNA because its the more adult wrestling show, you get somewhat what you would get back in the attitude era for WWF. guys being able to say what they want in promos hot females trying to get your attention in a different way rather than bad wrestling and things being a bit extreme at times, and i think a lot of people have that itch and i think if TNA wants to scratch it then by all means scratch it but you got to understand them banning chairshots to the head, just think about it.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 5 November 2010, 12:44:35 AM
Quote from: WeedMan420;45200
This is fuckin gay. I watch TNA because to me, it had what I liked (head chairshots, blood, women in skimpy clothing, and the ability to say ASS) so now everytime we see a chair, it's going to be a shit back shot? ooooo that's entertaining, all the chair shots are given to people bent over..


Are you seriously that thick? The reason they're banning them is because it's DANGEROUS for the people taking the headshots. Up to a few years ago we didn't really know all that much about how concussions worked and what they did to the people that receive them. They're dangerous and they're part of the reason you see so many wrestlers getting addicted to drugs and dying early.

But hey, if it's for your entertainment, then they should go ahead and do it. Jesus. Seriously, just watch some porn and get it over with, you're more likely to get most of the things you want there.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 5 November 2010, 01:48:08 AM
lol i wonder if they have ever made a wrestling porn parody.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: chappers on 5 November 2010, 10:59:29 AM
Quote from: WeedMan420;45200
This is fuckin gay. I watch TNA because to me, it had what I liked (head chairshots, blood, women in skimpy clothing, and the ability to say ASS) so now everytime we see a chair, it's going to be a shit back shot? ooooo that's entertaining, all the chair shots are given to people bent over..
I bet you bend over for TJChurch whilst he spanks you with a chair.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 5 November 2010, 01:45:19 PM
Quote from: chappers;45215
Quote from: WeedMan420;45200
This is fuckin gay. I watch TNA because to me, it had what I liked (head chairshots, blood, women in skimpy clothing, and the ability to say ASS) so now everytime we see a chair, it's going to be a shit back shot? ooooo that's entertaining, all the chair shots are given to people bent over..

I bet you bend over for TJChurch whilst he spanks you with a chair.


No, TJChurch writes erotica on his back.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 9 November 2010, 01:14:44 AM
from the look of the new Final resolution page on TNA.com it looks like Doug Williams is about to be on his way out of Fortune.

TNA Wrestling Presents: FINAL RESOLUTION Live on Pay-Per-View Sunday December 5th (http://www.tnafinalresolution.com/)

And I'm fine with that, i always thought him and Morgan were just thrown in there to match things up with all the ECW guys they wanted to use and just to give them something to do. Kaz,AJ,Flair and Beer Money seem more like a group to me.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 9 November 2010, 03:06:19 AM
Fourtune in awesome group, but it was pretty flawed from the start. The hand sign for a start looks totally retarded. Also, I know the group name is supposed to consist of Four 'Fortunate' guys + Flair, so why start with 6 guys + Flair. Morgan fit his bodyguard role well, but Williams was always a black sheep and never really fit in. Ideally my 4 would have been AJ, Beer Money & Morgan as Kaz does nothing for me at all as a character.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 9 November 2010, 08:33:54 PM
Quote
Credit: PWInsider.com

Eric Bischoff's son, Garrett, has joined TNA as a referee under the name Jackson James. Garrett was the referee in the main event of TNA Turning Point and appears in a segment on this week's Impact.

Word is that Bischoff's son has been training with Brian Knobbs of The Nasty Boys and that his identity had been kept quiet from people in the company. No word yet if they plan to reveal him as Bischoff's son on TV.

 I Was Wondering who that fail of a ref was, he fucked up the Matt Morgan vs Jeff Hardy match....or maybe its apart of a storyline? i dunno..

Quote
Credit: PWInsider.com

There was an incident after Monday's TNA Impact taping in Orlando. The company plugged that fans could get photos taken with Jeff Hardy after the tapings were over for $25. When that time came, Hardy came out and began insulting Jeremy Borash and the fans.

Hardy left, went to the back and did not return. After a few minutes, TNA and Universal Studios
employees began issuing refunds to fans. TNA and Universal staff were said to be completely confused and caught off-guard.

Just more reason for us to dislike TNA's Jeff Hardy.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 9 November 2010, 08:48:38 PM
Nepotism for the win
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 10 November 2010, 04:02:10 AM
TNA's new belt looks like the bastard child of the Swamp thing and the Diva's championship.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 10 November 2010, 07:46:12 PM
Quote
According to Mike Aldren of the Wrestling Globe Newsletter, TNA has signed Kevin Nash to a new deal. No further details are known at this time.

Nash's contract expired last month and he had posted the following on Twitter:

"Time to be a husband and dad
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: chappers on 10 November 2010, 09:04:05 PM
Quote from: Adampro123;45329
Quote
According to Mike Aldren of the Wrestling Globe Newsletter, TNA has signed Kevin Nash to a new deal. No further details are known at this time.

Nash's contract expired last month and he had posted the following on Twitter:

"Time to be a husband and dad
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 10 November 2010, 09:14:37 PM
They can't afford to pay EY but they resign this guy presumably on his previous bumper contract? Sure Nash sucks, but he does have a place in this Immortal storyline so i'm not too mad at this really.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 23 November 2010, 10:08:16 PM
Quote
Credit: thesun.co.uk

TNA wrestler Mick Foley says anyone in TNA who delivers a chair shot to the head should be fired considering the amount of concussion research available today compared to when Foley was in his prime.

"Knowing what we do know about concussions, the less times people are hit on the head with hard objects the better. I'm not saying we have to eliminate them totally, but I think anyone who throws a chair shot on a house show should be fired," Foley said in on the WrestleCast podcast with the U.K. Sun's Rob McNichol and Joel Ross.

Foley also questioned TNA's creative philosophy and TNA's television product frequently lacking meaningful wrestling matches.

"I remember being in a 10-man match with some really good wrestlers and the whole thing was over in five minutes. Sometimes the wrestling almost seems like an afterthought," Foley said.

"You're doing it at 5:30 in the afternoon in a theme park. I still think there should be more wrestling. That's my major complaint."

Foley added even more bluntly: "It is a wrestling show. It is called Total Nonstop Action. It's an easy solution. I still think it should be more wrestling-driven. That way when you do your angles it means more. Your promos mean more. I hope they give it a try."

Foley also said in the interview that he requested two TV segments for his most recent match against Ric Flair on the October 7 live Impact. Foley said he thought the match was better than he anticipated.

"I thought it was intense. People who write it off as garbage wrestling are not looking at how well everything was done. I thought we did a really good job," Foley said. "I think we could have done a better job of getting some eight counts and it was not a clear ending. Nonetheless, it was a better match than I thought I was capable of."

Listen to the full interview at The Sun | The Best for News, Sport, Showbiz, Celebrities | The Sun| The Sun (http://www.thesun.co.uk)

Love Foley, he's always honest and really misused in TNA. gotta agree with him on this one too.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 28 November 2010, 04:57:23 PM
Just been alerted towards the fact that Hamada, one half of the Knockout Tag Team Champions hasn't been seen on TNA television for 2 months.

Considering they ran a story where RVD wouldn't be able to defend his title so it was stripped, I find this fantastically ironic.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 28 November 2010, 04:57:56 PM
Just been alerted towards the fact that Hamada, one half of the Knockout Tag Team Champions hasn't been seen on TNA television for 2 months.

Considering they ran a story where RVD wouldn't be able to defend his title so it was stripped, I find this fantastically ironic.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 3 December 2010, 11:34:02 AM
I Really love watching reaction every week now, i used to just not watch it and just watch impact but one of my favorite things in wrestling each week is when fortune is on reaction, all 4 of those guys just seem like such a real group and i think they all put themselves over good and have mic skills, james storm to a lesser extent, they kind of keep him quite most of the time but that's fine.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 3 December 2010, 02:51:16 PM
Yeah Reaction is frigging awesome. I've seen it several times before and now only catch the segments when Mickie is on :P It's strange to say, but it's quite possibly the best wrestling related show. The quirky camera angles and the freedom they have to speak just can't be beaten by anything
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 6 December 2010, 01:28:36 AM
Quote
According to reports from PWinsider, Former TNA champion Samoa Joe's TNA contract has expired.

The word making the rounds is that Joe will be working tonight's Final Resolution PPV and this week's Impact tapings as he and the company negotiate the terms of a new deal.

Joe has been with TNA since 2005.

I Really hope Joe leaves. I'd love to see him in WWE just because he just needs something new to do, he's just kinda stale in TNA at this point.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 6 December 2010, 02:01:08 AM
I think he will ultimately end up re-signing with TNA as the safe bet. Will he be asked to take a paycut though like some of the other guys have done? Will he try his hand with the WWE if the option is there?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 6 December 2010, 06:12:02 AM
Joe should go to WWE and see if he can get like a guaranteed contract with a push.
The worse that happens is they say no and he goes to TNA.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 8 December 2010, 11:53:57 PM
Quote
- Beginning tomorrow night on iMPACT, Jeff Jarrett will hold an open challenge where he'll pay money to anyone who can "make him tap." Though plants were used, some fans in attendance believed the challenge to be legit and thus security had their hands full trying to keep them from hopping the rail.

Impact zone fans are so stupid.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 13 December 2010, 10:08:13 PM
Quote
- TNA have offered several independent wrestlers deals in the past few weeks. It's believed some of the talents may have come from their recent Gut Check workshop. Dixie Carter noted on Twitter that they have discovered potential future TNA stars coming out of the workshops.

I Don't know about this workshop but this is the right move by TNA, though if anyone should be trying to get talent from places like ROH and PWG and all the other indies i think TNA should. They could make the X-D awesome if they wanted to. hell they could make the main event awesome if they wanted to. and for the life of me i don't know why they haven't tried to sign the briscoes for there tag division.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 15 December 2010, 07:47:04 AM
Quote
Apparently in response to online reports noting concern over his condition backstage at last week's TNA Genesis PPV, TNA World Heavyweight Champion Jeff Hardy issued the following statement this evening on Twitter:

"AllThaTalkAboutLastSunday.... forThoseOfYouThatBelievedThoseWords... f***YOU!!!!SoWrong...SoWrong!!!!!I'm bustingMyAss2 helpTNA... Period!!"

"Can't StressEnough... ifYouBelievedThoseWords... f***YOU!!!!!"

"ThaStoryIsDead... becauseitShouldHaveNeverBeenBorn!!!SoWrong!!!!!"


If he wants to seem legit he might want to stop posting like a 15 year old white trash girl
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 15 December 2010, 05:30:19 PM
He seems a bit mad for something that apparently didn't happen, hmm.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: chappers on 15 December 2010, 11:13:23 PM
He really is a dick, I would love to see him kicked out of the company. Why do TNA put up with it, surely this is pretty bad for PR?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 16 December 2010, 09:43:02 PM
What a fucking lowlife.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 25 December 2010, 03:14:51 PM
I don't know what the situation is of Jimmy Rave, idk if he's under contact with someone or what but since Vance Archer aka Lance Hoyt aka Lance Rock got fired by WWE i would love to see TNA bring back the Rock N Rave Infection but make them more serious. i always liked that tag team and always thought they were misused.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 29 December 2010, 06:10:31 PM
Whats more hilarious? $15.99 for 10 greeting cards, or the fact they spelt his name wrong?

(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg828.imageshack.us%2Fimg828%2F3100%2Fscreenshot20101229at180.png&hash=381c6c57065cd7da9dfa90297a69abd242f14f20)

http://shoptna.com/eric-bishcoff-greeting-cards.aspx
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 29 December 2010, 11:47:28 PM
Quote
It appears as if TNA Reaction at this time is not on Spike TV's schedule for the entire month of January, so the season finale on December 30th will be the final episode of TNA Reaction for awhile.

Quote
- In an interview with Fanhouse.com, TNA President Dixie Carter told Brian Fritz that the recently cancelled TNA Reaction show was only slated to run through to the end of 2010.

"Reaction was never picked up as a 52-week show," Carter said. "It was planned to air through the end of 2010. Look for announcements coming soon regarding Impact!!!"

To read the full story, visit Fanhouse.com.

So i guess Reaction is cancelled which sucks because i liked that show. but it seems like dixies announcement could bring it back maybe?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 29 December 2010, 11:53:32 PM
I'm glad Reaction is gone, maybe a main event will end on Impact now.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 30 December 2010, 01:21:45 AM
Why would it matter? its not like it really stopped anything and had another theme to sit through. plus it gave more time to impact for the non main event with the main event going over onto reaction.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 30 December 2010, 01:31:37 AM
It was a cheap ploy for ratings and was ridiculous considering they have two hours of television to work with. They've used that formula for years and had no problems, then they realise they have back to back slots so can have it run over for the sake of it. No matches or segments got longer because of it early in the show, if anything it just gave us another backstage interview or a segment with Immortal; which is not needed.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 30 December 2010, 02:10:48 AM
Can' t say that for sure, who knows with TNA the 4 min matches we get now might have been cut to 2 mins.lol. or that might just skip some matches all together and do like you said and have another backstage immortal segment.

Cheap ploy. Strategy. either way doesn't really bother me as a viewer i never really care about the ratings anymore for any show.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 30 December 2010, 05:46:41 AM
Hell they could get more annoying and make Reaction a internet show using the same formula.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 30 December 2010, 04:58:15 PM
I wouldn't be against Reaction being on their website, I thought the show was great and did an awesome job of putting over the angles.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 30 December 2010, 09:59:31 PM
Yeah but as a fan wouldn't you be pissed if you were watching a TNA main event and it cut out halfway through than you had to wait for them to upload it or watch a crappy stream. And what if you didn't have access to the net?
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 30 December 2010, 10:02:19 PM
Yeah I would be pissed, but what I meant was that just Reaction should be a web exclusive at some point throughout the week and doesn't have to immediately follow iMPACT.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 30 December 2010, 10:22:15 PM
I think it would be good as a PPV pre show or something.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 10 January 2011, 04:24:18 AM
So Kennedy is the new champ, Fat Hardy debuts, but on twitter, Tyler Reks is trending. LOLTNA
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 10 January 2011, 05:14:35 AM
Not sure what was more surprising to me when I logged onto my computer tonight, Tyler Reks trending on twitter or the fact that TNA had a show tonight.
Title: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 10 January 2011, 05:20:19 AM
Just Watch this is what's gonna get Tyler Reks back on SD and off of superstars. lmao.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 11 January 2011, 08:39:26 PM
Quote
Just left Universal Studios. Had a great talk with Terry Taylor and Vince Russo about making the decision to quit TNA Wrestling. Thanks to everyone there for the past 2 years.

http://twitter.com/michaelmanna

Seems like TNA has basically trimmed the fat of all the ECW guys, that was worthwhile.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 11 January 2011, 09:10:11 PM
Trimmed the fat? Didn't they hire Matt Hardy?
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 11 January 2011, 09:39:57 PM
Richards is a good wrestler and i always liked him. wish he didn't go then again there's no spot for him in TNA.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 11 January 2011, 10:53:52 PM
Trimmed the fat? Didn't they hire Matt Hardy?

(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg192.imageshack.us%2Fimg192%2F2733%2Fparanoidjericho.gif&hash=f8cbe28b20e9d4d4f6d7bfb8433aa02e2644db1c)
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Awesome on 12 January 2011, 12:58:59 AM
(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg192.imageshack.us%2Fimg192%2F2733%2Fparanoidjericho.gif&hash=f8cbe28b20e9d4d4f6d7bfb8433aa02e2644db1c)
Stealing for my signature - thanks :D
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 12 January 2011, 02:00:13 AM
(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_leuq9tIaaW1qaspmko1_500.png&hash=fd93152fc8cee2ba88bccd2641356925f1f1f5a0)

AHAHAHA
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Awesome on 12 January 2011, 11:40:53 AM
Matt Hardy does not look good in that picture - he also looks like he might be about to throw up.

For those in the UK unable to watch iMPACT, it's free to watch at TNAOnDemand.com.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 12 January 2011, 01:09:56 PM
That is the greatest picture I've ever seen.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 12 January 2011, 02:37:40 PM
I wish this new site had rep because both Dale and Caz would get some right now auslol
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 12 January 2011, 04:18:50 PM
I wounder if someone can stage a mass grape attack on Matt Hardy. Next time hes out at the Impact Zone (On PPV) they just pelt him with grapes.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Awesome on 12 January 2011, 04:39:10 PM
I wish this new site had rep because both Dale and Caz would get some right now auslol
There is a modification to do add a reputation system, but it hasn't yet been updated to work with this version.

In the meantime, I have enabled Karma so you can applaud them or smite them as you see fit  ;)
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 12 January 2011, 05:52:48 PM
The worst part is he actually got back into shape. then it was like "well im going to TNA in a month better get fat again"


on what some may think is a brighter note....

Quote
nodq.com
- As noted before, TJ Perkins and El Generico wrestled dark matches at this week's iMPACT tapings. Perkins vs. Generico is booked for tonight's tapings.

I Like both Perkins and Genericho and both would be a great addition to bring the X-Division back to life, i hope these tryout matches work out and TNA Signs them
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 12 January 2011, 10:05:20 PM
Not a huge fan of Perkins and I dread to think how they'd use Generico.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 13 January 2011, 03:58:06 PM
As someone who has followed Generico up here in Montreal, this is a sad day.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 13 January 2011, 09:05:47 PM
TNA iMPACT! is finally being taken on the road, for one night anyway...


Quote
TNA Dixie posted: Excited to announce that TNA is taking 'iMPACT!' on the road to Fayetteville, NC on 2/24. More details soon at www.tnawrestling.com (http://www.tnawrestling.com)


Pretty awesome to see that they're going to be outside of the iMPACT! Zone, though it makes you wonder why they wouldn't do it for a PPV. The last iMPACT! taped outside of the IZ in 2008 had such a great feel to it, I'm hoping this one is the same.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 13 January 2011, 09:58:20 PM
I guess this is for the Hardys, Moore, and Helms.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 14 January 2011, 12:28:07 AM
It's live too (Y)
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 14 January 2011, 01:03:37 AM
I doubt helms will be in TNA as long as velvet sky is beings they had a bad break up.

when i first heard this ric flair country just came to my mind so i am expecting a big angle with him.

I hope they go on the road more often, as i have said many times before i hate the impact zone.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 14 January 2011, 01:23:42 AM
Helms has signed with Masked Warriors (Caz posted it on the main page, link at the top of the forum)
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 27 January 2011, 12:03:10 AM
iMPACT! has been really enjoyable these past two weeks. I love TNA when they actually make me want to watch, but then something always goes wrong. That being said, HA at Abyss coming out at the end of the show.

I wanted to watch wrestling, not a horror flick.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 27 January 2011, 12:16:35 AM
Hmm i haven't really watched Impact in about a month it seems. maybe i should catch up.

are they still doing the top 10 contenders thing?
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 27 January 2011, 12:22:56 AM
I don't think they've done the top 10 in a long time. Although they are running another THEY angle which is due to debut in 2 weeks time and will be the MEM
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 30 January 2011, 08:06:44 PM
Quote
In an apparent first, TNA Wrestling officials recently punished two wrestlers for testing positive for a substance banned on the organization's drug testing policy. Though TNA did not acknowledge the situation publicly, the guilty wrestlers were pulled from some house shows as punishment. Both wrestlers have since returned to action and remain on the active roster.

If it's anyone but the hardys I'm annoyed.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 30 January 2011, 08:52:18 PM
It's good to see they're using the testing policy.

It seems they're getting serious about the health of their performers. I mean, in 2006 they hired a beaten up and broken down Kurt Angle regardless of what condition he was in. In 2010, they pulled Desmond Wolfe off television for 4 months with an undisclosed condition. Small steps, but steps nonetheless.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: AngryCaz on 1 February 2011, 06:43:01 PM
Quote
Here is the lineup for the TNA Knockouts PPV, which is now available through InDemand PPV and other outlets:

* O.D.B vs. Tara for the Knockouts Championship - TNA Genesis 2010
* TNA Lockdown 2010 Steel Cage match with all Knockouts titles are on the line
* Roxxi vs. Madison Rayne and Career vs. Title - TNA Slammiversary 2010
* Madison Rayne vs. Angelina Love - Victory Road 2010
* Velvet Sky vs. Madison Rayne -TNA No Surrender 2010
* Tara vs. Velvet Sky vs. Madison Rayne vs. Angelina Love with special referee Mickie James - TNA Bound for Glory 2010
* Mickie James vs. Tara - TNA Turning Point 2010

I don't think there is a single match on the PPV that I'd pay to see. Maybe James/Tara.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 1 February 2011, 08:13:30 PM
Quote
Here is the lineup for the TNA Knockouts PPV, which is now available through InDemand PPV and other outlets:

* O.D.B vs. Tara for the Knockouts Championship - TNA Genesis 2010
* TNA Lockdown 2010 Steel Cage match with all Knockouts titles are on the line
* Roxxi vs. Madison Rayne and Career vs. Title - TNA Slammiversary 2010
* Madison Rayne vs. Angelina Love - Victory Road 2010
* Velvet Sky vs. Madison Rayne -TNA No Surrender 2010
* Tara vs. Velvet Sky vs. Madison Rayne vs. Angelina Love with special referee Mickie James - TNA Bound for Glory 2010
* Mickie James vs. Tara - TNA Turning Point 2010

I don't think there is a single match on the PPV that I'd pay to see. Maybe James/Tara.

The only way a knockout PPV would work is if there was nudity.

There I said it.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 1 February 2011, 10:36:30 PM
Quote
Here is the lineup for the TNA Knockouts PPV, which is now available through InDemand PPV and other outlets:

* O.D.B vs. Tara for the Knockouts Championship - TNA Genesis 2010
* TNA Lockdown 2010 Steel Cage match with all Knockouts titles are on the line
* Roxxi vs. Madison Rayne and Career vs. Title - TNA Slammiversary 2010
* Madison Rayne vs. Angelina Love - Victory Road 2010
* Velvet Sky vs. Madison Rayne -TNA No Surrender 2010
* Tara vs. Velvet Sky vs. Madison Rayne vs. Angelina Love with special referee Mickie James - TNA Bound for Glory 2010
* Mickie James vs. Tara - TNA Turning Point 2010

I don't think there is a single match on the PPV that I'd pay to see. Maybe James/Tara.
Same really, although I can totally understand why they do this with them being the top draws and all.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 16 March 2011, 06:11:46 AM
Quote from: TNA
AN IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT TO TNA WRESTLING FANS REGARDING SUNDAY’S VICTORY ROAD PAY-PER-VIEW

TNA Wrestling strives to give fans who purchase our pay-per-views as close to a full three-hour event as possible. This past Sunday’s “TNA Victory Road” fell short of that standard. Your support of TNA is never taken for granted. To show you how we value that support, we would like to offer six months of free access to the TNAondemand.com library.

To receive your free offer, please send us a copy of your Victory Road pay-per-view purchase receipt to :

TNA OnDemand Offer
209 10th Avenue South, #302
Nashville, TN 37203.

Please be sure and submit your name, address, and email address, as we will be emailing a special code that will unlock over 300 hours of great TNA Wrestling action.

I have to say I enjoyed this particular twitter reaction to this announcement:

"THE FIRST THING YOU SHOULD DO IS GO BACK TO A TNA 2005 PPV AND REMINISCE ABOUT A VINTAGE JEFF HARDY SCREWING OVER ANOTHER A VINTAGE TNA PPV."
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 16 March 2011, 06:41:19 AM
Honestly they should have let Samoa Joe go out there, tear Hardy a new asshole and let him win the title.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 16 March 2011, 06:45:47 AM
Thats pretty funny. at least they did something for those who actually ordered the show especially considering those who order the show shoulda probably expected something shitty from from an old man and a man passed his prime on drugs anyways.lol.

and i agree with Leo about Joe.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 16 March 2011, 01:51:33 PM
So their response to this is to offer the six people who bought the PPV 6 months of their on demand service?

I believe Mr. Leonardo Lunchbox put it best when he said:

Quote from:  THE Leonardo Lunchbox on September 03, 2009, 02:30:57 AM
LOL TNA
Seriously.

But really at least they did do something. Still doesn't make it any less ridiculous that it happened.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Fluttershy on 17 April 2011, 09:04:21 PM
Quote
Madison Rayne recently became the longest running TNA Women's Knockout Champion of all-time, besting Awesome Kong's 178 day reign with the title from October 23, 2008 to April 19, 2009. As of today, Rayne has has held the strap for 188 days.

Rayne defends the TNA Women's Knockout Championship tonight at TNA Lockdown against Mickie James in a Title vs. Hair Steel Cage Match.
PWPix


Good for Madison  O0 I remember when the title would change hands every Impact and PPV.

I suppose she will drop the title tonight thought, there is really no chance of TNA passing up the chance of one of their women making history by being the first to hold the 3 major women’s championships.  Shame really I would have preferred Gail or Kong  :(
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Dale on 17 April 2011, 09:17:30 PM
Gail has done NOTHING in the WWE since returning and Kong has never won the Women's title so how the hell you expect her to be the first to hold all 3 major championships I have no idea.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Fluttershy on 17 April 2011, 09:28:19 PM
Gail has done NOTHING in the WWE since returning and Kong has never won the Women's title so how the hell you expect her to be the first to hold all 3 major championships I have no idea.

(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg861.imageshack.us%2Fimg861%2F8669%2Fsmileyembarrassedn.gif&hash=0089f57cf14a9d91093346c2caaf43984acda99c) had a bit of a silly billy moment
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 8 June 2011, 07:55:36 PM
Am I crazy or didn't I made a "Hardy Boyz Suck" thread a little while ago? I can't seem to find it.

Anyway apparently Matt posted a video of Jeff tazing him the other day but took it down cause everyone flipped their shit. =|
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 8 June 2011, 09:02:10 PM
Hardy was blitzed out of his mind. Im 90% sure they took it down so the courts don't see him wasted and use it as evidence.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 8 June 2011, 09:39:06 PM
Actually my favorite part is Jeff goes to TNA after saying hes clean and has the worst match in the history of history due to the fact that he was blitzed out of his mind.
Meanwhile Matt bitches about being a jobber in WWE, tires to get in shape, goes to TNA, gets off his diet and goes right back to jobbing.

Also, Matt made a video saying that Jeff had been sober for months until that night when they decided to play a drinking game. So basically Jeff gets clean and Matt says fuck your sobriety lets get trashed! What a great brother he is.

LOVE THESE GUYS, A+ ENTERTAINMENT.

Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Awesome on 8 June 2011, 09:43:26 PM
Am I crazy or didn't I made a "Hardy Boyz Suck" thread a little while ago? I can't seem to find it.
*Official* Hardy Boys are Douchebags Thread (https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/index.php?topic=5634.0)
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 9 June 2011, 04:17:42 AM
Guess I didn't look hard enough lol
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 14 June 2011, 06:33:06 AM
Aries is back with TNA. Im not sure how I feel about this. If Austin Starr comes back im all fucking for it, best gimmick ever.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 14 June 2011, 09:59:37 PM
I'm not sure how i feel about Aries in general. he's a great wrestler but i get the feeling that the guy is a complete dick in real life.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 15 June 2011, 03:36:08 AM
Oh he totally is, he has little man syndrome. He wears like 3 inch platforms on his shoes and is still shorter than everyone. It is funny when he owns people on facebook though.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 19 June 2011, 06:05:13 PM
Paul Heyman Reveals His Plan to SAVE TNA/IMPACT Wrestling (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctpW7HhlRs0#)

I like Paul's idea. i wish this could have happened.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 2 July 2011, 06:47:20 AM
Impact was really good last night for the most part. it had limited commercial inturuption too which made it feel like the show flowed better because in TNA there are usually a lot of commercials breaks.

Jimmy Yang, Matt Bently, and Low-Ki really tore down the house and had a really good triple Threat.
I really liked the stuff with Mexican America and the British Invasion.
The main event was Sting vs Steiner and it was pretty much what you expect with sting and steiner.
Also enjoyed the Jeff Jarrett update they had with him and how he's loving being in mexico and doing well there. i like that he's not forgotten like Ric Flair and the Hardys seem to be.
Really liked the RVD/Jerry Lynn/AJ Styles/Christopher Daniels segment. i can't wait for there fatal 4 way next week and there matches at Destination X.
Joe vs Devon was ok. but i just really like this BFG series.
AJ vs Gunner was pretty good as well.

So pretty much besides the main event everything else was good.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 30 July 2011, 12:57:10 PM
Exclusive: CM Punk Is Coming To TNAOnDemand.com (http://www.impactwrestling.com/news/item/2865-Exclusive-CM-Punk-Is-Coming-To-TNAOnDemand-com)

This is just pathetic. i don't know weather to laugh at them or feel bad for them.

You fail at making your own stars so you try to market off of someone in another company...and you also show you had such a talent and you wasted him and let him slip away.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: chappers on 30 July 2011, 10:58:33 PM
I like how this is a big deal yet he probably did jack shit and realised TNA was crap whilst he was there. I guess its good they are doing it but dear oh dear, its like people will remember him at TNA yet I swear that would have been around the time when Lesnar was in WWE and TNA had absolutely no relevance.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 31 July 2011, 03:09:54 AM
rofl what? This would be like if WCW bragged about burying "Stunning" Steve Austin after he became Stone Cold in 97. Absolutely pathetic.

BTW, is it just me, or do they seem unable to decide on a name? Is it Impact Wrestling or TNA?
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 31 July 2011, 09:17:22 AM
Umm i don't even know for sure. technically it's still TNA but they don't use that name much anymore. I know Impact is now "Impact wrestling" where "Wrestling matters" yet they just signed another reality star and have less wrestling on there show than raw or SD a lot of the time.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 1 August 2011, 04:56:32 AM
(https://i.imgur.com/iYCsM.gif)

wut
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 1 August 2011, 05:48:48 AM
"BAH GAWD. STING PULLED OFF A MASK TO REVEAL STING"
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J.D on 2 August 2011, 06:03:09 PM
Lmao.
TNA, master of great storylines whether its Mick Foley fighting a match against a Rocky Balboa cardboard cut out or Sting taking off his mask to reveal Sting.
And when the show started it was innovative matches with young talent and now it is washed up guys and celebrities so they have lost that "underground pure wrestling" slant as Adam said the WWE has more wrestling.

Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 2 August 2011, 06:14:13 PM
Only Sting would refuse to go to WWE because he's worried about not being used properly, only to then go on to wear a mask of himself in TNA.

 *facepalm*
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J.D on 2 August 2011, 08:22:58 PM
Sting is like the guy we all know who hangs around with losers because he would prefer to be the leader of that group than a member of a much cooler group.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 12 August 2011, 06:15:19 AM
Quote
It has been over 6 weeks since i wrestles for tna and i still havent been paid and the check that they sent me 2 weeks ago bounced WTF!!!!!

From Jimmy Yangs twitter.

What a company....
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 12 August 2011, 04:25:12 PM
And people complain about the working conditions are bad?

And BTW, this is the first time I noticed Jimmy Wang Yang wasn't in WWE anymore lol
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 22 August 2011, 08:44:58 PM
Quote
We have all heard the spin for months after TNA Wrestling sees a dip in the Impact Wrestling rating. Good demos, lots of competition, and oh yes DVRs. However, Impact has dipped to such a low that even the biggest TNA optimists have to be in panic mode.

This past Thursday’s August 18 TNA Impact Wrestling rating is out and it isn’t pretty. According to reports, Impact did a whopping 1.05 rating. The last time an Impact episode dipped that low was back on June 9. The rating continues a trend of dipping ratings that could see TNA fall below a 1.0 within the next six weeks.

This is not good news at all. The pay per view buyrates aren’t much better. According to a report, the last two TNA Wrestling pay per views did around 8,000 buys, specifically Destination X and Hardcore Justice. To put it into even more perspective, Sting vs. Kurt Angle at one time on TNA pay per view did 50,000 buys. That is down 42,000 buys since their last match. Ouch!

A deeper look into the numbers shows that Impact averaged 1.46 million viewers. That is down from last week’s 1.54. The quick slide is almost unprecedented, even for TNA. The slide began on July 20 when TNA averaged a 1.26 rating and has dipped every week to this week’s all new low of 1.05. According to the report in the PWTorch.com, the 2011 Impact average is a 1.19 so this is very bad news.

To put the number into perspective, the final episode of ECW on the SyFy channel did a 1.14 rating with 1,445,000 viewers.

Rest of the blog is here: TNA Impact Wrestling Ratings Hitting Dangerous Territory | Camel Clutch Blog (http://camelclutchblog.com/tna-impact-wrestling-ratings-hitting-dangerous-territory/)

To quote my good friend Leo:

Quote
LOL TNA
Seriously.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 22 August 2011, 08:51:24 PM
Good i hope ratings keep drooping and they keep losing money and they finally just say fuck it and clean out everyone in creative. and fire a lot of guys on the roster and start fresh. i think thats the only thing that will save TNA now.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Awesome on 23 August 2011, 05:36:04 PM
Do you think it's simply a matter of location? As they are claiming that they have had record ratings for the UK airings.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: narcolepsy on 23 August 2011, 07:37:28 PM
Is it possible that the recently storylines in the WWE has actually contributed to the recent slide in TNA ratings?  I realize they aren't in direct TV competition, but with the WWE recently pushing a guy like CM Punk, bringing back Kevin Nash and almost restarting a more mature McMahon/Helmsley regime...isn't that almost what the rebellious TNA fans wanted?  The indy worker in CM Punk has broken through the WWE political system at the same time the WWE has eased up their PG restrictions.  I haven't noticed much of an uptick in the WWE's ratings, but the WWE has slightly cleaned up his act since the middle of June.

There may not be crazy hardcore or cruiseweight type matches on WWE programming, but you have to say MITB was one of the better PPVs of the last decade and Summerslam wasn't a disappointment.  I think some TNA fans are starting to see that TNA will be stuck in idle (or worse) and a bunch of workers are already looking to jump ship.  Now that the Cena dominated PG era has taken a slight break, you can reconsider the WWE as a viable alternative for the attitude era fan (most of which are becoming old enough to stop caring or just want some WWE nostalgia).
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 23 August 2011, 08:04:59 PM
Do you think it's simply a matter of location? As they are claiming that they have had record ratings for the UK airings.

Maybe. But TNA has its operations in the US, its main market is the US, majority of their talent is american, that's not really acceptable.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 24 August 2011, 04:42:25 AM
Nobody wants to fucking see Hulk Hogan and Ric Flair in 2011. Simple as. There prime was 20 fucking years ago.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J.D on 24 August 2011, 11:20:33 AM
Is it possible that the recently storylines in the WWE has actually contributed to the recent slide in TNA ratings?  I realize they aren't in direct TV competition, but with the WWE recently pushing a guy like CM Punk, bringing back Kevin Nash and almost restarting a more mature McMahon/Helmsley regime...isn't that almost what the rebellious TNA fans wanted?  The indy worker in CM Punk has broken through the WWE political system at the same time the WWE has eased up their PG restrictions.  I haven't noticed much of an uptick in the WWE's ratings, but the WWE has slightly cleaned up his act since the middle of June.

There may not be crazy hardcore or cruiseweight type matches on WWE programming, but you have to say MITB was one of the better PPVs of the last decade and Summerslam wasn't a disappointment.  I think some TNA fans are starting to see that TNA will be stuck in idle (or worse) and a bunch of workers are already looking to jump ship.  Now that the Cena dominated PG era has taken a slight break, you can reconsider the WWE as a viable alternative for the attitude era fan (most of which are becoming old enough to stop caring or just want some WWE nostalgia).

I think you have just hit the nail on the head with that post.
I think a lot of TNA fans have 'jumped ship.' They pride themselves on watching shows with young, fresh faces and that is what the WWE have given us with Punk instead of the same old recycled Hogan/Flair moments.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: ftwpodcast on 24 August 2011, 03:37:43 PM
And that point has been echoed on the Podcast as far back as the Fans' Choice Raw.

WWE is making moves that are risky, like Fans' Choice, like what they're doing with CM Punk, and those are things you would expect a small company like TNA to make. TNA has nothing to lose and yet, they continue to hold all of their cards in their hands while WWE continues to push them further and further out of existence.

10-months ago, Hogan released a video that basically said they were going to bring "real" and "shoot work" back into the mix, and were going to do things that no company has ever attempted. 10-months later, they're still at the same point. Only recently have you seen them push a guy like Samoa Joe properly. Hopefully, they do it right and get into a spot to take advantage of this demand that we have for stuff like this, but they don't have a lot of time left.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 25 August 2011, 01:22:48 AM
Quote
- Adult film company Third Degree Films is releasing a parody based on the Hogan family titled "Official Hogan Knows Best Porn Parody." Below is the description and cover photo:

"In this pants-wettingly funny parody, Hulk Hogan has a lot more on his hands than just his wife and kids! Follow the nation’s favorite wrestling hero and his super-tanned reality TV family as they heat up their Florida mansion with moves you won’t see in the ring! After downing a bucket of steroids and Viagra, the Hulkster calls a hooker to calm him down, giving new meaning to the ‘choke hold’ and ‘piledriver!’ Meanwhile Brooke catches hell for wearing a slutty shirt, which doesn’t seem to bother her boyfriend Bill, and Nick entertains Brooke’s horny friend Lexi, leaving his nerdy pal Linc to get it on with Linda! With this sex-crazed family all living under one roof, you’ll want to make sure you’ve got a ring-side seat!"

lmao
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Majin HoHo on 27 August 2011, 12:59:21 AM
I will fall on the floor laughing if Hogan sues for using his name and likeness!:D
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 8 October 2011, 01:47:34 AM
Quote
ProWrestling.net is reporting that TNA Wrestling has removed Vince Russo as the head creative team writer, and has replaced him with former WWE name Bruce Prichard. Russo is still with TNA, however, as he is considered the senior writer of TV, and continues to write the shows along with Matt Conway.

Prichard, who is also involved in Talent Relations in TNA, has been rumored for the past several months to be taking over Russo's role, and the move became official this week.

The move has not gone without criticism though, as it's being said there is concern in the back with Prichard being given this much power so early on in his run with TNA, especially since he was known for playing political games during his run in WWE

How is Bruce Prichard a step up from Vince Russo?
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 8 October 2011, 01:03:33 PM
Already posted in the BFG topic but why not.lol. But I have really enjoyed TNA since their last PPV i think their BFG build has been great and i don't know if it's because of prichard being in charge or what it is but TNA has really been good as of late.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 8 October 2011, 08:29:05 PM
Fair enough. But Prichard was writing for WWE like right after the Attitude era, so I think that says everything it needs to say :P
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 8 October 2011, 09:49:49 PM
Around what year was that? because i was never too much of an attitude era fan as in like around 97-99 i think i liked WWE between 99-03. so maybe that might explain it? i don't know though but anything is better than Russo and TNA needed a change i just hope they stop their formula of having a run in in every world title PPV match.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 8 October 2011, 11:19:11 PM
I don't know the exact years but he was writing for WWE since they stopped using Brother Love basically and left in 2008. Pretty sure he was one of the main writers around 2003. But ya, maybe it's one of those things where any change is good change.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Awesome on 14 October 2011, 10:08:33 PM
Dave Lagana is joining TNA as Director of Creative Writing.

IWantWrestling.com » Thank You... (http://iwantwrestling.com/2011/10/14/thank-you/)
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 14 October 2011, 11:41:17 PM
Quote
I leave Ring of Honor Wrestling to tackle new challenges. I’ve accepted a position as Director of Creative Writing with TNA Wrestling. My duties will be to focus solely on the development of new wrestling shows beyond the Impact Wrestling show. I’m excited to see what the future holds and thank everyone for the support over not only the last nine months of this site but through my entire career.

So he's just hired for some new show in which i have heard nothing about. so it's not really that big of a deal in terms of what we see every week.

A Shame too i got excited i like Lagana
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Majin HoHo on 5 November 2011, 06:35:40 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Wrestling Observer

Chris Masters, David Hart Smith, Melina and Vladimir Kozlov are now free to join TNA Wrestling since their respective ninety-day no-compete clauses with WWE expired Thursday. All four wrestlers were released on August 5, 2011.

The clause prohibits released talent from appearing for wrestling promotions with national television outlets for ninety days.

Masters caused fans to speculate he would be joining the Orlando based promotion with a Twitter message he posted two days following his departure. He wrote, "After a day of digesting,I must say WWE wasn't doing anything with me.So its probably best I go make my IMpact somewhere else."

Meanwhile, Melina was asked at last month's pre-launch party for Saints Row: The Third if she has plans to join TNA. The former WWE Women's Champion said she's "still deciding."


I would love to see David Hart Smith in TNA, just a great Wrestler for his size.He could easily put on a show with a big or strong guy, or a X-Division Champion.He is bred for greatness, and with all the genes he was given from his Father he understands and respects the business in and out.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 5 November 2011, 08:55:14 PM
I didn't think DH Smith was all that great from what i seen. his look just didn't work in any way for me and i didn't see anything special from him in the ring. plus i think he's doing MMA now so i doubt he will go to TNA.

Melina i copuld see in TNA and honestly she's the biggest name on the list. i think she would make a good addition to the Knockouts.

I just don't see Kozlov in TNA.

Masters i could see in TNA. i kind of like Masters and i thought his last run in the WWE he was sooo much better than his first run. he had some really good matches on superstars this year. im actually rooting for TNA to sign him.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 9 May 2012, 06:17:18 PM
I've been watching an old TNA Stream with all the early weekly 2 hour PPVs they used to do and it was so good around the 2003-2004 era. X division was at a peak the tag division was great and even the world title stuff was good and almost every match was really good or great.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 15 May 2012, 07:33:41 PM
Not many people will be interested but I just wanted to say i thought TNA Sacrifice was a very good PPV. that's 2 in a row now for TNA i hope they keep the trend going.

Daniel & Kazarian vs Joe & Magnus was really good.
TV title match was pretty good. nothing bad and it was kind of fun.
Knockouts title match i skipped so i can't comment on that.
Hardy vs Anderson was good until the end which was botched by Earl Hebner. I can't stand that Referee.
All the Joeseph parks stuff was amazing!
Bully Ray and Austin Aries backstage promos were really good. Bully Ray saying he doesn't use twitter and if you want to reach him you gotta go old school....myspace.com/calvezilla. lmao.
Bully Ray vs Austin Aries was great! a MOTYC.
Crimson promo i thought was pretty good. im kind of warming up to him i think he plays the heel role better than a face role.
Crimson vs Eric Young was pretty good. Anything with Eric Young is always fun.
AJ Styles vs Kurt Angle was another great match and another MOTYC.
Roode vs RVD was pretty good. nothing great though. especially since it was a ladder match. it just goes to show that RVD is way passed his prime and either needs to retire or maybe join in some tag team.

Overall it was a really good show. If nothing else i would check out Bully Ray vs Aries and Styles vs Angle.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Majin HoHo on 16 May 2012, 05:20:19 PM
Agree with ya Adam, first of all, was a hell of a opener to the PPV, WWE take pointers.Even though I wanted Joe and Magnus to keep the title a little longer, wasn't too pissed off that Daniels and Kaz won.Knockouts match was solid, better than WWE has down with their divas the past couple of months for sure.Brooke might claim the Knockouts title, to shake up the division, cause it needs it.Hardy vs Anderson usually is good matches, thought it was average.Park is getting on my nerves alittle, he acts like a second rate JBL.I remember dissing Park on twitter, he was saying something about his so called brother, and I said on twitter, cough..cough whatever you say Abyss.He tweeted back to me, you should get that cough checked out,lol.Promos done with Aries and Bully Ray were boss, he's a great quote, "When I am on Twitta I trend on Twitta!" -Bully Ray.The match itself boss, my friend nearly got killed when Aries hit the guailrail, he was wearing a Machinima T-shirt, and the other guy on the right, is a friend too.They both do various amount of streams, and gaming on a weekly basis.I wonder if Aries vs Ray 2 will happen at Slammiversary but I doubt it.Angle vs Styles beautifully done.RVD vs Roode, great spots with RVD, Roode did well in a match he's not used to being in.I wonder if RVD was truely injured because RVD kicking the Ladder, and Roode just grabbing the title, felt weird to me, thought the  match would go longer. Overall grade for me, 8.5 out of 10.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 18 May 2012, 02:30:56 AM
Quote
Tony Nese confirmed today on his official Twitter account that he requested his release from TNA. His post is included below:

    I wanted to be the first to inform everyone that I have requested my release from TNA Wrestling. As a professional wrestler I have many goals and dreams that I work hard to achieve, one of them was to have the opportunity to perform in front of a live audience on national television and I thank TNA Wrestling for providing me with that opportunity. Another goal of mine is to wrestle against some of the top international superstars with the chances to travel the world and work for some of the best international companies that have the best talent in wrestling today.

    I have recently been approached with an opportunity to step in the ring with The Great Muta, a wrestling legend, and one of All Japan Pro Wrestling’s top wrestlers Kai. This is an opportunity that I feel with help me further my goals and career. This event will be provided via IPPV and unfortunately my TNA contract did not allow me to perform on such events. I requested that an exception would be granted given my lack of appearances but was denied. My next action was to request a release as I think it will be in my best interest.

    I would like to thank TNA Wrestling for helping me achieve one of my goals as it is very few in this business that are able to say they have. I would also like to thank all the people that support me as this is just a small chapter coming to an end in my career and I have many more exciting opportunities in my future to come. – Anthony Nese

Not big news for a lot of people but i always liked Nese i thought he was great from everything i have seen and thought he should be x division champion. Such a great waste of talent by TNA on this one and the guy seems like a really good guy.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 18 May 2012, 03:39:42 PM
Quote
http://Brooke Hogan is following in her father's giant yellow footsteps ... TMZ has learned she just inked a deal to join the TNA Wrestling family.

TNA President Dixie Carter tells TMZ ... Brooke is NOT going to be a wrestler ... but rather an executive who will be tasked to develop female talent.

We're told Brooke's duties will help up and coming she-wrestlers develop their characters, help with backstage promos and even consult on entrance music.

Obviously, 24-year-old Brooke has been around the wrestling world her entire life ... and believes she can help improve the organization. It doesn't hurt that her father also works for TNA.

Carter tells us, "Brooke is such a great talent who's really sharp and will make a great addition to the TNA family."

Goodnight Sweet Knockouts Division.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 22 May 2012, 08:10:18 AM
Quote
According to F4WOnline.com, Alex Shelley will be leaving TNA Wrestling shortly when his contract expires as he has chosen not to renew.

As noted earlier, WWE is looking at doing a "cruiserweight" show on the WWE Network and they are said to be interested in Shelley.

We'll keep you posted as we hear more.

Would love to see Shelley in WWE. also would love to see Sabin to singles wrestling in the x division in TNA. as much as i love MMG I miss seeing sabin in singles X-D action.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Majin HoHo on 22 May 2012, 02:34:36 PM
TNA have misused the Guns lately, when Sabin returned I thought the Guns would clash in a best outta 5 with Joe and Magnus didn't happen at all.Next I would of thought one them turn on the other, to give the X-Division some more respect than just Aries.If Shelley does leave TNA, Sabin will follow, and I imagine WWE have them in FCW for a couple of months, then come up to the main roster, but that's if..Shelley leaves.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 23 May 2012, 03:47:11 PM
Quote
According to several sources close to the situation, Ric Flair has indeed quit Impact Wrestling, and he basically just stopped showing up to events. The assumption at this point is that he's going to sign a WWE Legends deal and help fill time on the new TV network. Flair has energy drink and lottery endorsements to fall back on, too.

Additionally, WZ has learned that Alex Shelley quit TNA as well. Apparently WWE will fill extra TV time with, among other things, a Cruiserweight division and/or tag teams, and are looking for smaller wrestlers by way of stocking either, or both. While it has not been confirmed, Shelley will likely go to WWE. There has also been talk of WWE running a Cruiserweight show on the new Network, which could also be a possibility for Shelley.

Wouldn't be surprised to see Flair back in WWE. Shelley, I don't know.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: ftwpodcast on 23 May 2012, 04:08:25 PM
Shelley, I'm not sure about. But on this week's show (out later on today) we all definitely agree that Flair will be back in WWE. Just not sure how.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 14 June 2012, 03:04:08 PM
Quote
According to F4WOnline.com, there might be an ulterior motive for Scott Steiner's recent Twitter rants, aimed at Eric Bischoff and Hulk Hogan, aside from simple venting.

The report notes that Steiner and Jeff Jarrett are very close, and Steiner's recent verbal attacks of both Bischoff and Hogan might be an attempt to get Jarrett back into power in TNA.

(https://forums.wrestlingfusion.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi235.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fee319%2FDeathOfBlades%2FDis-Gon-B-Gud.gif&hash=cda616971b35e20c0ecd7b27e6924f22daa845b3)
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 15 June 2012, 12:37:40 AM
I love living in a world where Scott Steiner is right. Wait, no i fucking don't.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 16 June 2012, 03:28:23 AM
Picture doesn't work.

But i kind of feel like Jeff got screwed in all this. It was his company and i don't know what happened really but it seems like he got pushed out the door.

With that said i think he may be returning to feud with Sting.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 19 July 2012, 07:29:32 AM
Quote
According to Wrestling Observer editor Dave Meltzer, TNA Wrestling officials are hopeful that their efforts toward improving the product will result in better business by this fall, whether it's increased pay-per-view purchase numbers or attendance.

"Meltzer adds, "I think everyone realizes that the people who gave up on TNA are not going to come back quickly, and word-of-mouth, even today when you’ve got social media, can't turn things around. They realize they have a lot to do to rebuild fan trust in the product."

Just saying it's a good time to start watching or start re watching some TNA it has been really good for most of the year.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 19 July 2012, 05:41:05 PM
Thursdays are tough for me based on my TV viewing but if I give up WWE after next week I might give it a shot. I watch on occasion as it is but don't really follow.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Awesome on 19 July 2012, 06:55:28 PM
Quote from: @mexwarrior (https://twitter.com/mexwarrior/status/225973963812122625)
Well, the news is out..Chavo is TNA bound!! Looking forward to facing off with some of the best talent in the biz! Thank u @TNADixie
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 19 July 2012, 07:27:39 PM
Nevermind what I said before, I won't watch.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 19 July 2012, 11:49:40 PM
He'll more than likely just be there to be x division talents over like kid kash. Always kind of liked Chavo so no issue there.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 28 July 2012, 11:51:23 PM
Maybe it's just that CWMonkey is isolating them, but it sure does seem like Kenny King botches a lot:

(https://i.imgur.com/Lfr5B.gif)

(https://i.imgur.com/3bNQC.gif)
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 29 July 2012, 02:32:23 AM
I don't know if i would call those legit botches. first one seemed like just an unorthodox sell and the second seemed like King just got too much elevation on his jump kick. From everything i have ever seen of Kenny King in ROH he's usually pretty clean and spot on with everything. He's no Sin Cara or Sabu that's for sure.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 13 August 2012, 08:09:02 PM
Quote
-Punk was asked who he would work with if he could work with anyone. He said Samoa Joe. Punk was also asked which wrestler from an independent company he would like to see in the WWE. Punk said Samoa Joe again. The fan said that Samoa Joe works for TNA and Punk said something like: "I know. You said indy didn’t you?"

WWE News: C.M. Punk on the new WWE Title, planning to retire early, WrestleMania main event, Kevin Nash's recent comments on smaller wrestlers, JTG's Twitter comments, DVD screening, working on a comic (http://www.prowrestling.net/artman/publish/WWE/article10026776.shtml)

:giggle
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 14 August 2012, 11:11:13 PM
I don't think i would live through a Samoa Joe v CM Punk match in WWE.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 15 September 2012, 09:10:12 PM
Quote
- PWInsider has confirmed that TNA's Impact Wrestling will remain live each week through the end of 2012. There may be exceptions on certain weeks during the holiday season but TNA and Spike recently came to terms on keeping the show live. An official announcement should be issued soon.

Good to see they will be staying live until 2013. hopefully by then they will sign a new deal and always be live and maybe start going on the road for impact.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 15 October 2012, 10:27:58 PM
So Drug Hardy is champion again. The crowd goes mild.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 16 October 2012, 06:25:08 AM
Typical blind cynical thing to say from a TNA hater.

Bound for glory was a great PPV.

RVD vs Zema Ion was really good. one of RVDs best matches in a long time.

Joe vs Magnus was really good. Joe wins and magnus looks strong.

Storm vs Roode was a great match to cap off one of the best feuds i have seen in years. MOTYC

Joey Ryan vs Snow was fun. Good to see Morgan back and good to see Joey Ryan finally get him a TNA contract. im looking forward to seeing where Ryan & Morgan go from here.

AJ & Angle vs Chavo & Hernandez vs Daniels & Kazarian was great. maybe the match of the night. MOTYC. I Think Hernandez &
Chavo going over is good. AJ & Angle can get back into singles and Daniels and Kaz can feud with Chavo & Hernandez for a while. all of these teams are great and you couldn't go wrong in this one

Skipped the knockouts but saw Tara won and then introduced her boyfriend which was some dude from some reality show. I never heard of the dude. Jessie something i think his name was...yeah moving on.

Sting & Bully vs Aces & 8s was pretty good. pretty much what you would expect, a lot of brawling with some nice spots. Devon being with aces & 8s was a nice little twist but a bit underwhelming being that no one really cares about Devon. Should have been Jeff jarrett.

Aries vs Hardy was another great match. Another MOTYC. I don't have a problem with hardy winning. He's off the drugs and has had his life together for well over a year now and has been doing good in TNA and delivering in the ring. plus he's the most over guy in the company. I don't think he will be champion for too long. i see Aries winning it back before the end of the year.

All and all a really great show. I skipped the knockouts but the Tara and her bf part was the only meh part of the night.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 16 October 2012, 03:38:07 PM
Even if it's "blind and cynical" the odds of Jeff Hardy fucking up are always high (pun intended), no matter how long he's been reportedly clean.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 17 October 2012, 01:33:07 AM
Seriously why give Hardy the title? Cause he was on a "Road to Redemption"? Its like his 5th one in 10 years.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Adampro123 on 17 October 2012, 04:40:14 AM
I heard they did because his contract is coming to an end soon and they wanted to make him re sign with them. And also because he's the most over guy in the company. probably sales the most merch and stuff. so in a way thats kind of like saying why give john cena the title? minus the risk of course.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: J.D on 19 October 2012, 05:26:49 PM
I wouldn't personally give Jeff the title. He is a liability and to be honest there are far more deserving guys in TNA.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 6 November 2012, 05:38:56 PM
Quote
Nashville City Paper is reporting Scott Steiner's new lawsuit against TNA Impact Wrestling includes allegations that the company allowed Jeff Hardy to compete under the influence, and it resulted in Steiner being injured. The match in question took place last year in Mount Pleasant, Michigan, and the suit states the following:

“[TNA] knew or should have known that their agent, employee, representative, and/or servant was too incapacitated, intoxicated and/or under the influence of a controlled substance and should not have been allowed to enter the ring thus endangering the life, health, well being and safety of Scott Rechsteiner.”

The hearing is scheduled for November 30th in Davidson County Court, and Steiner is seeking $750,000 in damages, including loss of consortium to his wife. You can view the entire article at this link.

I really wish Steiner had written that quote himself.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Awesome on 22 February 2013, 05:52:30 PM
AJ Styles (Discharge) | ShopTNA (http://shoptna.com/aj-styles-discharge.aspx)

I think Kevin Steen says it best:
Quote from: @FightSteenFight (https://twitter.com/FightSteenFight/status/305008820697063425)
HAHAHAHA WHAT?!?!?!?!
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: chappers on 22 February 2013, 08:12:57 PM
He should join WWE soon, plenty of good feuds and matches he could have.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 23 February 2013, 09:19:54 AM
So Don West is personally making the merch now? He must watch videos of AJ doing the Pele kick to make all those shirts.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: RyPrax on 25 February 2013, 10:38:48 PM
AJ Styles With AJ Lee as his manager. Then they could be AJ^Squared.
Title: Re: TNA sucks / Random Discussion
Post by: Leonardo Lunchbox on 27 February 2013, 08:32:10 AM
Shut up prax.
SimplePortal 2.3.8 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal